Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Equinox FrameworkAdmin"

m
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Motivation ==
 
== Motivation ==
Generally speaking, an OSGi framework (hereafter we call fw) needs some configuration files for its launch. A fw will be launched by invoking java command or by executing an executable launcher file. In the former case, configurations for fw implementation to to read will be required. In the latter case, executable launcher file also might read some configuration files at its invocation.  
+
Generally speaking, an OSGi framework (hereafter we call fw) needs some configuration files for its launch. A fw will be launched by invoking java command or by executing an executable launcher file. In the former case, configurations for fw implementation to read will be required. In the latter case, executable launcher file also might read some configuration files at its invocation.  
 
* As in Eclipse, org.eclipse.osgi plug-in that contains main class of equinox fw implementation reads config.ini in a configuration area. In addition, eclipse.exe is provided as an executable launcher which reads eclipse.ini in the same directory and invokes fw.   
 
* As in Eclipse, org.eclipse.osgi plug-in that contains main class of equinox fw implementation reads config.ini in a configuration area. In addition, eclipse.exe is provided as an executable launcher which reads eclipse.ini in the same directory and invokes fw.   
  
Currently, the focus of OSGi Service Platform Specification has been to standardize a runtime infrastracture. On the other hand, how to configure and launch a fw is not addressed. Therefore, scenarios such as bootstrapping OSGi on a clean system are left difficult to manage in a fw independent way.
+
Currently, the focus of OSGi Service Platform Specification has been to standardize a runtime infrastructure. On the other hand, how to configure and launch a fw is not addressed. Therefore, scenarios such as bootstrapping OSGi on a clean system are left difficult to manage in a fw independent way.
  
 
==Overview:What FramerowkHandler enables?==
 
==Overview:What FramerowkHandler enables?==
Line 28: Line 28:
 
   
 
   
 
==Senarios that the API would help==
 
==Senarios that the API would help==
;PDE UI: to ease the targetting of various frameworks
+
;PDE UI: to ease the targeting of various frameworks
 
;Provisioning agent: to setup a non running framework
 
;Provisioning agent: to setup a non running framework
 
;Building an application: to create all the config files required to run
 
;Building an application: to create all the config files required to run
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 
The client bundle will get the appropriate FwHandlerAdmin service object that can meet its requirements by filtering service properties in the service registry. An example of filtering is the target fw implementation and its version. As for filtering, [[#Provider of these APIs|later section]] will explain it in detail. Then, the client will get new instance of FwHandler which plays a main role in this API.
 
The client bundle will get the appropriate FwHandlerAdmin service object that can meet its requirements by filtering service properties in the service registry. An example of filtering is the target fw implementation and its version. As for filtering, [[#Provider of these APIs|later section]] will explain it in detail. Then, the client will get new instance of FwHandler which plays a main role in this API.
 +
 +
The interface has a method which might return the FwHandler object initialized according to the running fw and launcher state. Detail of this would be introduced [[#Current our proposal|later]].
  
 
In addition, it also has a method to launch a fw according to the specified FwHandler object.
 
In addition, it also has a method to launch a fw according to the specified FwHandler object.
  
 
===FwHandler===
 
===FwHandler===
A client bundle can get a FwHandler object by FwHandlerAdmin.getFwHandler(). This object keeps both a FwConfigData object and a FwLauncherData object, each of which has setter and getter methods on parameters to be required for a fw launch. The client can set some parameters to be required for launching a fw via FwConfigData object or FwLauncherData object. The parameters set in this object can be saved. Where to save is determined according to the parameters set at that time in a target framework and launcher implementation dependent way.
+
A client bundle can get a FwHandler object by FwHandlerAdmin.getFwHandler(). This object keeps both a FwConfigData object and a FwLauncherData object, each of which has setter and getter methods on parameters to be required for a fw launch. The client can set some parameters to be required for launching a fw via FwConfigData object or FwLauncherData object. The parameters set in this object can be saved. Where to save is determined according to the parameters set at that time in a way dependent on a target framework and launcher implementation.
  
 
The client also can load parameters from fw config files and launcher config files in the specified locations.
 
The client also can load parameters from fw config files and launcher config files in the specified locations.
  
After parameters are set to this object either by setting via a FwConfigData or a FwLaucnherData or loading from configuration files, FwHandlerAdmin.launch(FwHandler, File) will launch a fw according to the current parameters set in this object. It migiht invoke a fw by java command or executing the specified launcher.  
+
After parameters are set to this object either by setting via a FwConfigData or a FwLaucnherData or loading from configuration files, FwHandlerAdmin.launch(FwHandler, File) will launch a fw according to the current parameters set in this object. It might invoke a fw by java command or executing the specified launcher.  
  
 
Remember if you have set parameters but not have saved yet, this launch might use other parameters because actual launch will use parameters retrieved from the configuration files.
 
Remember if you have set parameters but not have saved yet, this launch might use other parameters because actual launch will use parameters retrieved from the configuration files.
Line 59: Line 61:
 
*Bundles list to be installed, with their persistently marked flag as started or not and their start level for its configuration.  
 
*Bundles list to be installed, with their persistently marked flag as started or not and their start level for its configuration.  
 
*Beginning start level and initial bundle start level.
 
*Beginning start level and initial bundle start level.
*System properties dependent of a fw implementaion.
+
*System properties dependent of a fw implementation.
*System properties independent of a fw implementaion.
+
*System properties independent of a fw implementation.
  
For most fw implementaions, these parameters will be saved into their fw config files. However, this API doesn't restrict where to save. For example, a fw implementation and a launcher implementation might need to save these parameters not in fw config files but in a launcher config files. It depends on the target implementations.
+
For most fw implementations, these parameters will be saved into their fw config files. However, this API doesn't restrict where to save. For example, a fw implementation and a launcher implementation might need to save these parameters not in fw config files but in a launcher config files. It depends on the target implementations.
  
 
===FwLauncherData===
 
===FwLauncherData===
Line 69: Line 71:
 
*Java VM arguments.
 
*Java VM arguments.
 
*Location of fw config files.
 
*Location of fw config files.
*Location of fw persistent data, where a fw implementation save information to be kept persistently, such as bundles state, permissions of bundles, start level information, private persistent storages for bundles, and so on. In addition, this location sho
+
*Location of fw persistent data, where a fw implementation save information to be kept persistently, such as bundles state, permissions of bundles, start level information, private persistent storages for bundles, and so on.  
*Clean flag: a flag to clean the specified locaiton of fw persistent data.
+
*Clean flag: a flag to clean the specified location of fw persistent data.
  
For most fw implementaions, these parameters will be saved into their launcher config files, if executable launcher is used. However, this API doesn't restrict where to save. As in Apache Felix, location of fw persistent data should be written in its fw config file. Therefore, the implementation of FwHandler for Felix should save it into not launcher config file but its fw config file.
+
For most fw implementations, these parameters will be saved into their launcher config files, if executable launcher is used. However, this API doesn't restrict where to save. As in Apache Felix, location of fw persistent data should be written in its fw config file. Therefore, the implementation of FwHandler for Felix should save it into not launcher config file but its fw config file.
  
 
===FwBundleState===
 
===FwBundleState===
Line 80: Line 82:
  
 
===Provider of these APIs===
 
===Provider of these APIs===
First of all, we supposed that an implementation of this API for each fw implementation will be provided by the implementators of the target fw, because the persons who know the fw implementaion the most are the implementators of the target fw.
+
First of all, we supposed that an implementation of this API for each fw implementation will be provided by the implementators of the target fw, because the persons who know the fw implementation the most are the implementators of the target fw.
  
 
For clients to filter the proper service object, the provider must register the FwHandlerAdmin object with service properties keyed by the followings.
 
For clients to filter the proper service object, the provider must register the FwHandlerAdmin object with service properties keyed by the followings.
Line 88: Line 90:
 
;FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_LAUNCHER_NAME: String; name of the launcher
 
;FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_LAUNCHER_NAME: String; name of the launcher
 
;FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_LAUNCHER_VERSION: String; version of the launcher
 
;FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_LAUNCHER_VERSION: String; version of the launcher
**Current Limitation: there is no version range.Version Range might be required.
+
*Current Limitation: there is no version range.Version Range might be required.
 +
*Offline, the implemenentator of FwHandlerAdmin must declare these values and client must know them.
  
Offline, the implemenentator of FwHandlerAdmin must declare these values and client must know them.
+
There is another service property name to be standardized.
 +
;FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_RUNNING_FW_FLAG: true if its getFwHandlerRunning() returns the initialized FwHandler object of running system.
 +
*Detail of it would be introduced [[#Current our proposal|later]].  
  
 
===Client of these APIs===
 
===Client of these APIs===
Line 98: Line 103:
 
===Which interface should a method of launch operation belong to?===
 
===Which interface should a method of launch operation belong to?===
 
Currently, a method of launch operation belongs to FwHandlerAdmin interface.
 
Currently, a method of launch operation belongs to FwHandlerAdmin interface.
I can seperate this API into another interface like ''"FwLauncher"''. But I am not sure how much merit of it would be.  
+
I can separate this API into another interface like ''"FwLauncher"''. But I am not sure how much merit of it would be.  
 
* One merit of the separation is, we can restrict some bundles so that can configure a fw but cannot launch it, by not giving ServicePermission("GET","FwLauncher").
 
* One merit of the separation is, we can restrict some bundles so that can configure a fw but cannot launch it, by not giving ServicePermission("GET","FwLauncher").
 
* One demerit of it is, number of interface will be increased by one, even if this interface only has one method.
 
* One demerit of it is, number of interface will be increased by one, even if this interface only has one method.
Line 107: Line 112:
  
  
==How to get the running fw information?==
+
==How to handle running fw information?==
There is a need for manipulating configurations not only non-running fw but also running fw. The following stuff are not determined yet. But that's our current idea for realizing it.
+
There is a need for manipulating configurations of not only a non-running fw but also a running fw. While there are several ways to realize it, currently we adopt the following way. The alternatives to realize it are shown [[Alternatives of Handling a Running Fw]].
 +
 
 +
===Current our proposal===
 +
 
 +
The bundle that registers a FwHandlerAdmin service for a particular fw and launcher implementation will do at its registration as follows;
  
Realizing the following goals will result in realizing what we want.
+
# A bundle checks if the bundle can register a FwHandlerAdmin object whose getFwHandlerRunning() returns not null but a FwHandler object initialized according to the running fw and launcher implementation, somehow. The way how the bundle checks it is dependent of its target fw and launcher implementation.
*allow a client to know the values required for filtering in order to get the proper FwHandler service object that can manipulate the running fw.
+
# If no, the bundle registers a FwHandlerAdmin service for a target fw and launcher implementation, whose getFwHandlerRunning() returns null, with specified service properties including the ones representing fw name/version and launcher name/version. 
*allow a client to know FwConfigLocation, FwPersistentDataLocation, and FwLauncherLocation of a running fw.
+
# If yes, the bundle registers a FwHandlerAdmin service for a target fw and launcher implementation, whose getFwHandlerRunning() returns a FwHandler object initialized according to the running fw and launcher implementation. The registration is done with specified service properties including not only the ones representing fw name/version and launcher name/version, but also '''FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_RUNNING_FW_FLAG'''="true".  
;FwConfigLocation: This location contains the fw config files that used for a target fw launch.  
+
;FwPersistentDataLocation:  This location contains the fw persistent data files that used for a target fw launch.
+
;FwLauncherLocation: This location contains the fw launcher file that used for a target fw launch.
+
Then, a client can get information about running fw and manipulate it after setting the location information to the FwHandler object.
+
  
First, let me think about how we realize the first goal.
+
Regarding when the bundle should register a FwHandlerAdmin service is not addressed. However, the typical timing is at its start up.
In order to know the values about running fw, coorporation of fw and launcher implementation is required. We would like to standardize as follows:
+
# A fw implementation will receive values about its launcher name, version, and location of its executable launcher, somehow, if executable launcher is used. The way how to pass the values from a launcher to a fw implementation is not  specified here. The typical way is via system properties keyed by the predefined name. On the other hand, a fw implementation itself can specify its fw implementation name and version.
+
# Then, a fw implementation needs to tell these information to a client somehow. There are several ways to realize it.
+
##One of them is assigning the dedicated key name of framework properties that can be retrieved by BundleContext#getProperty(name). For example of the dedicated key name are ''"org.osgi.framework.service.fwhandler.fwname/fwversion/lanchername/launcherversion"''.
+
##The other is defining another service interface that is registered by a fw implementation and allows a client to get these information.
+
  
Next, let me think about how we realize the second goal. While we defined it yet, there are two ideas how to realize it:
+
A client bundle can get the initialized FwHandler object as follows;
# A fw implementation will register several DataLocation services for each Location of running fw, as an API of org.eclipse.osgi.service.datalocation.Location.
+
<pre>
# A fw implementation will register a DataLocation service, whose methods allow a client bundle to get to know each location of running fw. In this case, this API also can provide the information about fw name/version and launcher name/version as described previously.
+
String filter = “(FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_RUNNING_FW_FLAG=true)”.
 +
ServiceReference references[] = context.getServiceReferences(FwHandlerAdmin.class.getName(), filter);
 +
FwHandlerAdmin fwHandlerAdmin = (FwHandlerAdmin) context.getService(references[0]);
 +
FwHandler fwHandler = fwHandlerAdmin.getFwHandlerRunning(); < initialized.
 +
</pre>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 16:46, 19 January 2007

This document is under construction.

Motivation

Generally speaking, an OSGi framework (hereafter we call fw) needs some configuration files for its launch. A fw will be launched by invoking java command or by executing an executable launcher file. In the former case, configurations for fw implementation to read will be required. In the latter case, executable launcher file also might read some configuration files at its invocation.

  • As in Eclipse, org.eclipse.osgi plug-in that contains main class of equinox fw implementation reads config.ini in a configuration area. In addition, eclipse.exe is provided as an executable launcher which reads eclipse.ini in the same directory and invokes fw.

Currently, the focus of OSGi Service Platform Specification has been to standardize a runtime infrastructure. On the other hand, how to configure and launch a fw is not addressed. Therefore, scenarios such as bootstrapping OSGi on a clean system are left difficult to manage in a fw independent way.

Overview:What FramerowkHandler enables?

We would like to address this problem by proposing a simple API that would allow to configure a non running framework and launch it in a fw independent way. Framework Handler provides fw independent way for a bundle running on a fw to do the followings.

  • Set configurations required to launch a fw, such as
    • Java VM location,
    • Java VM arguments,
    • executable launcher location,
    • beginning start level and initial bundle start level,
    • Bundles to be installed and started with their start levels,
    • fw configuration location,
    • fw persistent date location,
  • Launch a fw with the specified configurations, such as Java VM, Java VM arguments and so on.
  • Expect its bundles state if the specified configurations are used for a fw launch.

Terminologies used in here

Fw config files
configuration files that will be read by a fw implementation at its launching, e.g. config.ini in the directory specified by osgi.configuration.area system property as for equinox.
Executable launcher
an executable fw launcher file, e.g. eclipse.exe as for Eclipse.
Launcher config files
configuration files that will be read by an executable launcher, e.g. eclipse.ini as for eclipse.exe.
Bundles state
state of bundles that represents what kinds of bundles are installed, resolved and to be started on a fw.

Senarios that the API would help

PDE UI
to ease the targeting of various frameworks
Provisioning agent
to setup a non running framework
Building an application
to create all the config files required to run
Running the framework
to configure and start a framework from java command

See [1] [2].

API: Package org.eclipse.core.fwhandler

Interfaces defined in org.eclipse.core.fwhandler package will be introduced briefly. See the codes and Java docs in detail.

FwHandlerAdmin

The only interface whose implementation will be registered into the OSGi service registry in this package is FwHandlerAdmin.

The client bundle will get the appropriate FwHandlerAdmin service object that can meet its requirements by filtering service properties in the service registry. An example of filtering is the target fw implementation and its version. As for filtering, later section will explain it in detail. Then, the client will get new instance of FwHandler which plays a main role in this API.

The interface has a method which might return the FwHandler object initialized according to the running fw and launcher state. Detail of this would be introduced later.

In addition, it also has a method to launch a fw according to the specified FwHandler object.

FwHandler

A client bundle can get a FwHandler object by FwHandlerAdmin.getFwHandler(). This object keeps both a FwConfigData object and a FwLauncherData object, each of which has setter and getter methods on parameters to be required for a fw launch. The client can set some parameters to be required for launching a fw via FwConfigData object or FwLauncherData object. The parameters set in this object can be saved. Where to save is determined according to the parameters set at that time in a way dependent on a target framework and launcher implementation.

The client also can load parameters from fw config files and launcher config files in the specified locations.

After parameters are set to this object either by setting via a FwConfigData or a FwLaucnherData or loading from configuration files, FwHandlerAdmin.launch(FwHandler, File) will launch a fw according to the current parameters set in this object. It might invoke a fw by java command or executing the specified launcher.

Remember if you have set parameters but not have saved yet, this launch might use other parameters because actual launch will use parameters retrieved from the configuration files.

In addition, FwHandler enables for a client bundle to expect bundles state if the specified configurations are used for launch without actual launch.

FwConfigData

FwConfigData is a class that keeps some parameters for a FwHandler object such as,

  • Bundles list to be installed, with their persistently marked flag as started or not and their start level for its configuration.
  • Beginning start level and initial bundle start level.
  • System properties dependent of a fw implementation.
  • System properties independent of a fw implementation.

For most fw implementations, these parameters will be saved into their fw config files. However, this API doesn't restrict where to save. For example, a fw implementation and a launcher implementation might need to save these parameters not in fw config files but in a launcher config files. It depends on the target implementations.

FwLauncherData

FwLauncherData is a class that keeps some parameters for a FwHandler object such as,

  • Location of Java VM.
  • Java VM arguments.
  • Location of fw config files.
  • Location of fw persistent data, where a fw implementation save information to be kept persistently, such as bundles state, permissions of bundles, start level information, private persistent storages for bundles, and so on.
  • Clean flag: a flag to clean the specified location of fw persistent data.

For most fw implementations, these parameters will be saved into their launcher config files, if executable launcher is used. However, this API doesn't restrict where to save. As in Apache Felix, location of fw persistent data should be written in its fw config file. Therefore, the implementation of FwHandler for Felix should save it into not launcher config file but its fw config file.

FwBundleState

The implementating object of FwBundleState will be created by FwHandler object. At the time of its creation, this object will compose bundles state according to the parameters that the FwHandler object keeps. It means, bundles which can be obtained by FwHandler.getFwConfigData().getBundles() will be installed on a virtually launched fw using parameters about fw persistent data location. If the data location is not empty and clean flag is false, the installed bundles persistently recorded there should be taken into consideration to compose the bundles state.

After creating this object, this object also provides ways for a client to resolve bundles, install additional bundles, uninstall bundles virtually. Modification of this object never affects the parameters of the FwHandler object which created this object.

Provider of these APIs

First of all, we supposed that an implementation of this API for each fw implementation will be provided by the implementators of the target fw, because the persons who know the fw implementation the most are the implementators of the target fw.

For clients to filter the proper service object, the provider must register the FwHandlerAdmin object with service properties keyed by the followings.

FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_FW_NAME
String; name of the framework
FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_FW_VERSION
String; version of the framework
FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_LAUNCHER_NAME
String; name of the launcher
FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_LAUNCHER_VERSION
String; version of the launcher
  • Current Limitation: there is no version range.Version Range might be required.
  • Offline, the implemenentator of FwHandlerAdmin must declare these values and client must know them.

There is another service property name to be standardized.

FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_RUNNING_FW_FLAG
true if its getFwHandlerRunning() returns the initialized FwHandler object of running system.
  • Detail of it would be introduced later.

Client of these APIs

A client bundle will get appropriate FwHandlerAdmin service object from an OSGi service registry by filtering the service properties described previously in order to get the FwHandler objects to handle the desired fw and launcher implementation.

TBD

Which interface should a method of launch operation belong to?

Currently, a method of launch operation belongs to FwHandlerAdmin interface. I can separate this API into another interface like "FwLauncher". But I am not sure how much merit of it would be.

  • One merit of the separation is, we can restrict some bundles so that can configure a fw but cannot launch it, by not giving ServicePermission("GET","FwLauncher").
  • One demerit of it is, number of interface will be increased by one, even if this interface only has one method.

Launching a fw instance in the Same Process

At this point, launching a fw instance in the same process is not considered yet in this API, explicitly. However, it will be supported in the future.

  • What is not sure is “general way of launching a fw instance in the same process”. The API might be able to support it (JavaVM and JavaVM arguments are not used for it obviously).


How to handle running fw information?

There is a need for manipulating configurations of not only a non-running fw but also a running fw. While there are several ways to realize it, currently we adopt the following way. The alternatives to realize it are shown Alternatives of Handling a Running Fw.

Current our proposal

The bundle that registers a FwHandlerAdmin service for a particular fw and launcher implementation will do at its registration as follows;

  1. A bundle checks if the bundle can register a FwHandlerAdmin object whose getFwHandlerRunning() returns not null but a FwHandler object initialized according to the running fw and launcher implementation, somehow. The way how the bundle checks it is dependent of its target fw and launcher implementation.
  2. If no, the bundle registers a FwHandlerAdmin service for a target fw and launcher implementation, whose getFwHandlerRunning() returns null, with specified service properties including the ones representing fw name/version and launcher name/version.
  3. If yes, the bundle registers a FwHandlerAdmin service for a target fw and launcher implementation, whose getFwHandlerRunning() returns a FwHandler object initialized according to the running fw and launcher implementation. The registration is done with specified service properties including not only the ones representing fw name/version and launcher name/version, but also FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_RUNNING_FW_FLAG="true".

Regarding when the bundle should register a FwHandlerAdmin service is not addressed. However, the typical timing is at its start up.

A client bundle can get the initialized FwHandler object as follows;

String filter = “(FwHandlerAdmin.SERVICE_PROP_KEY_RUNNING_FW_FLAG=true)”.
ServiceReference references[] = context.getServiceReferences(FwHandlerAdmin.class.getName(), filter);
FwHandlerAdmin fwHandlerAdmin = (FwHandlerAdmin) context.getService(references[0]);
FwHandler fwHandler = fwHandlerAdmin.getFwHandlerRunning(); < initialized.

References

  1. Requirements for a new update manager (of Eclipse)
  2. Requirements discussed in OSGi Alliance Enterprise Workshop
  3. Equinox: Runtime options of Eclipse 3.2
  4. Felix: Usage
  5. Knopflerfish: Usage

Back to the top