Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "EclipseLink/Development/DevMeetings"

Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
=== Status updates ===
 
=== Status updates ===
 +
==== 1.0 Release ====
 
* Bug Updates:
 
* Bug Updates:
 
** [http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/Bugs Bug Queries and other useful links]
 
** [http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/Bugs Bug Queries and other useful links]
** Open for 1.0: 64
+
** Open for 1.0: 13
** 27 Opened this week.
+
*** 2 unassigned
** 48 closed this week
+
*** (2 regressions in untargetted bucket)
*** eight in M9???? others are 1.0, M8, untarget
+
* Runtime Project Move
*** Solution?
+
** Done
 
+
* Graduation/Release review
* Bug DB usage
+
** Done: June 26th
** If you are working on a bug, assign it to yourself.
+
** next step?
*** add dummy inbox to the cc list.
+
==== 1.0.M10====
** Set the target milestone to the correct milestone.
+
* Milestone release Date - June 25 2008
*** Confusion/concern on this part
+
** Milestone up - some regressions
*** Milestones
+
** Infrastructure issues - related to Ganymede??
**** 1.0M9 are bugs that are to be fixed by the the corresponding milestone build.
+
** Showstopper Mode
**** 1.0 is a bug that is to be fixed by 1.0, but has no current target milestone.
+
*** All 1.0 assigned bugs are accounted for
**** 1.0.1 new bugs should be filed against this target
+
**** reviewing unassigned bugs today
* Bug council
+
** Introduce notion of Bug council
+
** Wed 2:30pm
+
*** Untargeted bugs are going to be reviewed by bug council on a weekly basis (current proposed time is directly after weekly status meeting (2:30 ET on Wednesdays).
+
**** A milestone will be set - or set to future
+
**** Bug may get assigned
+
*** When you enter a new bug, leaving it untargeted means that the bug council will review to decide which release it is targeted for.
+
*** If you know which milestone the bug will be fixed in, assign it accordingly.
+
*** The new target - future - is for bugs that don't have a target yet.
+
 
+
* Runtime Project
+
** ONGOING
+
** Move EclipseLink to runtime project.
+
** Keep history except for newsgroups.
+
** Target right after M8
+
 
+
* Community
+
** Eric Gwin
+
*** New committer!  Thanks for voting
+
 
+
* Code headers
+
** Ensure Header is dual license EDL + EPL
+
*** Found and fxed some build xml files.
+
** Ensure contributor is correct - new code should have code author (no - intial code from oracle)
+
*** Found and fxed some build xml files.
+
  
==== 1.0M9 ====
+
==== 1.0.M11====
* Milestone release Date - June 18 2008
+
* Branching July 2nd
** 8 Open bugs - please review
+
** 8 fixed
+
 
* Foundation and JPA Status
 
* Foundation and JPA Status
 
* OSGi - Tom
 
* OSGi - Tom
** Dynamic Weaving Checked in
 
** Changing external dependencies to use package imports instead of bundle imports
 
 
* Workbench
 
* Workbench
** Tested XML and EIS mapping functionality.
 
**  Able to open of toplink mapping workbench 10.1.3 projects
 
** Corrected the issue with Cache Synchronization (replaced functionality erroneously removed)
 
 
* MOXy, JAXB, SDO - Blaise D
 
* MOXy, JAXB, SDO - Blaise D
 
* DBWS - Mike N
 
* DBWS - Mike N
 
* Build System
 
* Build System
* Documentation Status - Rick S
+
** Test failures are not being reported.
** Complete [[EclipseLink/UserGuide|User's Guide]] available. Minor/final cleanup remaining, as needed.
+
** Spatial tests being run by default.
** Discussion
+
* Documentation Status
*** Packaging convention for dependancies (i.e. the projects we depend on that are not from Orbit)
+
**** Do we want a src and bin/classes directory
+
**** Should classes just exist at the base of the project (what about the jar we eventually create)
+
**** How should we name the jars we create
+
  
==== 1.0 Release ====
+
 
 +
=== General Issues ===
 
* [[EclipseLink/Development/Release/1.0#1.0_Release_Criteria | Exit Criteria]]  
 
* [[EclipseLink/Development/Release/1.0#1.0_Release_Criteria | Exit Criteria]]  
 
** 1.0M8  June 4, 2008  Final functionality freeze   
 
** 1.0M8  June 4, 2008  Final functionality freeze   
Line 101: Line 67:
 
**** Should classes just exist at the base of the project (what about the jar we eventually create)
 
**** Should classes just exist at the base of the project (what about the jar we eventually create)
 
**** How should we name the jars we create
 
**** How should we name the jars we create
 
 
=== General Issues ===
 
 
* WIKI Changes should be done in parallel to any bug fixes to eclipselink.*.test ant targets or other public API changes - mobrien 20080529.
 
* WIKI Changes should be done in parallel to any bug fixes to eclipselink.*.test ant targets or other public API changes - mobrien 20080529.
 
* DONE Bugzilla components - sign-off on final changes below
 
* DONE Bugzilla components - sign-off on final changes below
Line 115: Line 78:
 
** We currently do not have a system to ensure a bug has a published priority level
 
** We currently do not have a system to ensure a bug has a published priority level
 
** We should discuss how will we deal with these issues
 
** We should discuss how will we deal with these issues
 +
* Bug DB usage
 +
** If you are working on a bug, assign it to yourself.
 +
*** add dummy inbox to the cc list.
 +
** Set the target milestone to the correct milestone.
 +
*** Confusion/concern on this part
 +
*** Milestones
 +
**** 1.0M9 are bugs that are to be fixed by the the corresponding milestone build.
 +
**** 1.0 is a bug that is to be fixed by 1.0, but has no current target milestone.
 +
**** 1.0.1 new bugs should be filed against this target
 +
* Bug council
 +
** Introduce notion of Bug council
 +
** Wed 2:30pm
 +
*** Untargeted bugs are going to be reviewed by bug council on a weekly basis (current proposed time is directly after weekly status meeting (2:30 ET on Wednesdays).
 +
**** A milestone will be set - or set to future
 +
**** Bug may get assigned
 +
*** When you enter a new bug, leaving it untargeted means that the bug council will review to decide which release it is targeted for.
 +
*** If you know which milestone the bug will be fixed in, assign it accordingly.
 +
*** The new target - future - is for bugs that don't have a target yet.
 +
* Code headers
 +
** Ensure Header is dual license EDL + EPL
 +
*** Found and fxed some build xml files.
 +
** Ensure contributor is correct - new code should have code author (no - intial code from oracle)
 +
*** Found and fxed some build xml files.
 +
  
 
=== Upcoming Issues ===
 
=== Upcoming Issues ===

Revision as of 13:43, 26 June 2008


The EclipseLink committers have a regular meeting (currently weekly) to discuss ongoing development issues and projects. All interested parties are welcome to attend. If you have any additional items you wished discussed please add them at the bottom of the agenda including a brief description and any relevant links. Alternatively development issues can be discussed on the EclipseLink Dev mailing list.

* When adding agenda items please send an email to the eclipselink-dev@eclipse.org list notifying attendees. This will ensure attendees are aware of agenda items prior to the meeting.

Agenda June 26 2008

2PM EST, Wednesday June 26, 2008

Dial In Info: 1-888-967-2253, Conf ID/Password: 486546/486546

Status updates

1.0 Release

  • Bug Updates:
  • Runtime Project Move
    • Done
  • Graduation/Release review
    • Done: June 26th
    • next step?

1.0.M10

  • Milestone release Date - June 25 2008
    • Milestone up - some regressions
    • Infrastructure issues - related to Ganymede??
    • Showstopper Mode
      • All 1.0 assigned bugs are accounted for
        • reviewing unassigned bugs today

1.0.M11

  • Branching July 2nd
  • Foundation and JPA Status
  • OSGi - Tom
  • Workbench
  • MOXy, JAXB, SDO - Blaise D
  • DBWS - Mike N
  • Build System
    • Test failures are not being reported.
    • Spatial tests being run by default.
  • Documentation Status


General Issues

  • Exit Criteria
    • 1.0M8 June 4, 2008 Final functionality freeze
    • 1.0RC1 June 18, 2008 Release Candidate 1
    • 1.0RC2 June 25, 2008 Release Candidate 2
    • 1.0 Release July 9, 2008 Final 1.0 Release (moved from june 25th to be released after Ganymede)
    • Schedule Dependencies
      • Eclipse reviews: graduation, release, and move to RT
      • Ganymede to leverage Equinox 3.4 (June 25)
  • Pre-release tasks
    • 3rd party works-with approval for Oracle JDBC - Doug
    • COMPLETE IP Log - Peter
    • Complete Features Index - Doug with support of all committers
    • Complete Examples & How-to materials - Doug/Shaun
    • FAQ
    • Update wiki Documentation for 1.0 Features - Liza (starting in May) with committer support
    • Finalize product packaging and distribution - ZIP(s), Bundle access (update site?)
    • Prepare and schedule reviews
    • Discussion
      • Packaging convention for dependancies (i.e. the projects we depend on that are not from Orbit)
        • Do we want a src and bin/classes directory
        • Should classes just exist at the base of the project (what about the jar we eventually create)
        • How should we name the jars we create
  • WIKI Changes should be done in parallel to any bug fixes to eclipselink.*.test ant targets or other public API changes - mobrien 20080529.
  • DONE Bugzilla components - sign-off on final changes below

http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipselink-dev/msg00640.html

  • Automated Testing
    • Need SRG test models for JPA, MOXy and SDO
      • DB components of those tests should be simple enough to run on Derby
      • Need to test Core SRG on Derby
  • Bug Prioritization and targetting
    • Currently more bugs are scheduled for 1.0.1 then we are likely to fix in that time
    • We currently do not have a system to ensure a bug has a published priority level
    • We should discuss how will we deal with these issues
  • Bug DB usage
    • If you are working on a bug, assign it to yourself.
      • add dummy inbox to the cc list.
    • Set the target milestone to the correct milestone.
      • Confusion/concern on this part
      • Milestones
        • 1.0M9 are bugs that are to be fixed by the the corresponding milestone build.
        • 1.0 is a bug that is to be fixed by 1.0, but has no current target milestone.
        • 1.0.1 new bugs should be filed against this target
  • Bug council
    • Introduce notion of Bug council
    • Wed 2:30pm
      • Untargeted bugs are going to be reviewed by bug council on a weekly basis (current proposed time is directly after weekly status meeting (2:30 ET on Wednesdays).
        • A milestone will be set - or set to future
        • Bug may get assigned
      • When you enter a new bug, leaving it untargeted means that the bug council will review to decide which release it is targeted for.
      • If you know which milestone the bug will be fixed in, assign it accordingly.
      • The new target - future - is for bugs that don't have a target yet.
  • Code headers
    • Ensure Header is dual license EDL + EPL
      • Found and fxed some build xml files.
    • Ensure contributor is correct - new code should have code author (no - intial code from oracle)
      • Found and fxed some build xml files.


Upcoming Issues

The following items require discussion but are not yet at the stage where a solution can be proposed.

Minutes from Past Meetings

References

Eclipse 3.4 EE Ganymede M6 20080212

Eclipse 3.4 EE Ganymede M7 20080515

Back to the top