Difference between revisions of "EclipseLink/DesignDocs/367452"

From Eclipsepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
(Work Required)
 
Line 53: Line 53:
 
#: Completed
 
#: Completed
 
# ON support in Criteria API
 
# ON support in Criteria API
#: approx 4 days
+
#: approx 3 days
 
# Testing
 
# Testing
 
#: approx 3 days
 
#: approx 3 days

Latest revision as of 10:53, 10 September 2012

[edit] Design Specification: Join with ON clause

ER 367452

[edit] Document History

Date Author Version Description & Notes
22 December 2011 Gordon Yorke Initial Document created

[edit] Project overview

JPA 2.1 will add support for an ON clause within the JOIN clause of a Java Persistence Query. Support will be required for both JPQL and Criteria queries.

[edit] Concepts

Generally the only condition for a JOIN is that of the Foreign Key but the ON clause is intended to allow users to specify additional conditions for the JOIN.

eg: JPQL: SELECT s.name FROM Suppliers s LEFT JOIN s.products p ON p.status = 'inStock'

SQL: SELECT s.name FROM Suppliers s LEFT JOIN Products p ON s.id = p.supplierId AND p.status = 'inStock'

[edit] Requirements

Support the ON clause syntax of JPQL and the Criteria APIs

[edit] Design Constraints

[edit] Design / Functionality

[edit] Testing

[edit] API

[edit] GUI

[edit] Config files

[edit] Documentation

[edit] Work Required

  1. ON support in expression framework and JPQL
    Completed
  2. ON support in Criteria API
    approx 3 days
  3. Testing
    approx 3 days

[edit] Open Issues

This section lists the open issues that are still pending that must be decided prior to fully implementing this project's requirements.

Issue # Owner Description / Notes

[edit] Decisions

This section lists decisions made. These are intended to document the resolution of open issues or constraints added to the project that are important.

Issue # Description / Notes Decision

[edit] Future Considerations

During the research for this project the following items were identified as out of scope but are captured here as potential future enhancements. If agreed upon during the review process these should be logged in the bug system.