Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "EclipseLink/Bugs/309681"

m (org.eclipse.persistence.testing.tests.wdf.jpa1.entitymanager)
m (org.eclipse.persistence.testing.tests.wdf.jpa1.entitymanager)
Line 204: Line 204:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| testRefreshManagedNewNotOnDB || @Bugzilla|| 309681 || we assume that referesh is not ignored but it throws EntitynotFoundException, instead -> not covered by SPEC
 
| testRefreshManagedNewNotOnDB || @Bugzilla|| 309681 || we assume that referesh is not ignored but it throws EntitynotFoundException, instead -> not covered by SPEC
 +
|}
 +
 +
 +
{| style="width:100%" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5"
 +
|+ TestRemove
 +
|- bgcolor=lightgrey
 +
!width="250"| method
 +
!width="100"| skip annotation
 +
!width="70"| bugid
 +
!| analysis
 +
|-
 +
| testRemoveFlushRemoveAgain || @Bugzilla || 309681 || test assumes has special state DELETED_EXECUTED, which EclipseLink hasn't
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 10:59, 4 May 2010

Bug 309681 - Investigate WDF test annotated with @ToBeInvestigated

The test suite jpa/eclipselink.jpa.wdf.test ("WDF tests") has originally not been written for EclipseLink but for a different JPA implementation. Many tests don't fit perfectly to EclipseLink but are failing due to different issues. In order to benefit from the additional test set as soon as possible, it has been decided to exclude failing tests from a regular test execution using the special skip annotations. Skipping the questionable tests allows to incorporate the WDF tests into the nightly regression test suite.

The annotation @Bugzilla(bugid=<bug id>) indicates that a test is skipped due to an issue, which is followed up in an bugzilla ticket with id <bug id>.

The annotation @ToBeinvestigated indicates that a test is not compatible with EclipseLink and is skipped but the reason for the incompatibility has to be investigated.

Analysis of Tests by Package

org.eclipse.persistence.testing.tests.wdf.jpa1.entitymanager

TestCache
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testContains @ToBeinvestigated
testInvalidateRemote @ToBeinvestigated
testInvalidateUpdate @ToBeinvestigated
testNotOwningSide @ToBeinvestigated
testNotOwningSide2 @ToBeinvestigated
testRelation @ToBeinvestigated
testTimetoLive @ToBeinvestigated


TestCascadeFlush
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testSimpleCascadeToDetached2a @ToBeinvestigated
testSimpleCascadeToDetached2b @ToBeinvestigated
testSimpleCascadeToDetached2c @ToBeinvestigated


TestCascadeMerge
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testCascadeDetached @ToBeinvestigated
testSimpleCascadeNew @ToBeinvestigated


TestCascadeRefresh
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testCascade @ToBeinvestigated


TestCascadeRemove
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testCircularCascade @ToBeinvestigated


TestEntityManagerFactory
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testEntityManagerFactoryCloseActiveTransaction @ToBeinvestigated


TestFlush
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testChangedEntityIgnoredByFlush @Bugzilla 309681 A flush before a query flushes an entity not queried for. This could be surpressed.
testRelationshipToRemoved @Bugzilla 309681 Employee has a relationship to Cubicle, which has been removed (not yet flushed). This should be rejected with IllegalStateException according to JPA1: 3.2.3.
testRelationshipToRemovedLazy @Bugzilla 309681 An employee has a collection of projects. We remove a project, which is a project of emp1. We assigne the projects of emp1 (as a lazy collection) to a newly created emp2. Emp2 now has a reference to the removed project. Persisting emp2 succeeds in spite of JPA1: 3.2.3. an IllegalStateException would be expected.


TestGetReference
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testCascadePersistOnFlush @ToBeinvestigated
testCascadeRemove @ToBeinvestigated


TestMerge
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testIlegalArgumentWithDeserializedEntity @ToBeinvestigated
testIlegalArgumentWithLazyRelationPending @ToBeinvestigated
testMergeDetachedWithRelation @ToBeinvestigated
testMergeNewWithRelation @ToBeinvestigated
testMergeRemoved @ToBeinvestigated
testNastyTimestampTwice @ToBeinvestigated
testNastyTimestampTwiceNotInitial @ToBeinvestigated


TestPersist
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testNastyTimestampTwice @Bugzilla 309681 non-entity subclass of entity cannot be persisted
testPersistDeleteExecuted @Bugzilla 309681 does not fail; no special state for "DELETE_EXECUTED"
testPersistRemovedEntityWithIdModifiedInPrePersist @Bugzilla 309681 removed entity can be reinserted in same PC; em does not contain removed entity although not yet flushed
testPersistRemovedEntityWithIdModifiedInPrePersistFlushed @Bugzilla 309681 removed entity can be reinserted in same PC; no state DELETE_EXECUTED


TestReadOnly
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testCacheQueriedEntity @Bugzilla 309681 fails with a NPE; it turns out that an entity annotated with @ReadOnly is not inserted at all
testIllegalFieldModification @Bugzilla 309681 fails with a NPE; it turns out that an entity annotated with @ReadOnly is not inserted at all
testQueryCachedEntity @Bugzilla 309681 fails with a NPE; it turns out that an entity annotated with @ReadOnly is not inserted at all


TestRefresh
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testRefreshDeleted @Bugzilla 309681 EL throws IllegalArgumentException; seems in alignment with SPEC
testRefreshManagedCheckContains @Bugzilla 309681 if a refresh fails with an EntityNotFoundException, the entity is still contained in the PC. Issue?
testRefreshManagedNew @Bugzilla 309681 test assumes that refresh transits a "managed_new" entity to managed state -> duprec
testRefreshManagedNewNotOnDB @Bugzilla 309681 we assume that referesh is not ignored but it throws EntitynotFoundException, instead -> not covered by SPEC


TestRemove
method skip annotation bugid analysis
testRemoveFlushRemoveAgain @Bugzilla 309681 test assumes has special state DELETED_EXECUTED, which EclipseLink hasn't

Back to the top