Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "EclipseCon Submission Guidelines"
(New page: {{Backlink|EclipseCon 2008}} ==Discussion== Category:EclipseCon2008) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Backlink|EclipseCon 2008}} | {{Backlink|EclipseCon 2008}} | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
| + | The EclipseCon conference committee is committed to putting on the best EclipseCon ever. The most important feature of EclipseCon is the presentations. Typically there are far more quality presentations than there are slots. This section of the wiki is dedicated to establishing common guidelines that will be used by the program committee members to evaluate and select presentation proposals. | ||
| + | ==Selection Criteria== | ||
| + | * '''Quality''' | ||
| + | **'''Abstract quality''': a well-articulated, well-written abstract should be indicative of the quality of the presentation | ||
| + | **'''Speaker quality''': known, expert speakers are clearly desirable | ||
| + | **'''Outline''': An outline of the presentation that is submitted with the proposal is desirable | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Feedback''' | ||
| + | ** '''Program Committee Votes''': | ||
| + | ** '''Committer Votes''': | ||
| + | ** '''Community Votes''': | ||
| + | ** '''Community Feedback''': As represented in the EclipseZilla comments | ||
| + | ** '''Presenter Response''': How does the presenter respond to feedback? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Balance''': | ||
| + | ** '''Content Depth''': Introductory to Advanced Topics | ||
| + | ** '''Track Coverage''': Wide range of subjects within the track | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Open Source''' | ||
| + | ** '''Source Available''': The source or examples used in the talk should be freely available under OSS license. | ||
| + | ** '''Eclipse Technology''': Presentations on Eclipse technology are preferred. | ||
| + | ** '''Open Source''': Presentations on Open Source technology that interacts with Eclipse are better. | ||
| + | ** '''Commerical Eclipse''': Commercial products that are Eclipse focused are less good. | ||
| + | ** '''Commercial Non Eclipse''': Not appropriate for EclipseCon. | ||
[[Category:EclipseCon2008]] | [[Category:EclipseCon2008]] | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 1 August 2007
< To: EclipseCon 2008
Discussion
The EclipseCon conference committee is committed to putting on the best EclipseCon ever. The most important feature of EclipseCon is the presentations. Typically there are far more quality presentations than there are slots. This section of the wiki is dedicated to establishing common guidelines that will be used by the program committee members to evaluate and select presentation proposals.
Selection Criteria
- Quality
- Abstract quality: a well-articulated, well-written abstract should be indicative of the quality of the presentation
- Speaker quality: known, expert speakers are clearly desirable
- Outline: An outline of the presentation that is submitted with the proposal is desirable
- Feedback
- Program Committee Votes:
- Committer Votes:
- Community Votes:
- Community Feedback: As represented in the EclipseZilla comments
- Presenter Response: How does the presenter respond to feedback?
- Balance:
- Content Depth: Introductory to Advanced Topics
- Track Coverage: Wide range of subjects within the track
- Open Source
- Source Available: The source or examples used in the talk should be freely available under OSS license.
- Eclipse Technology: Presentations on Eclipse technology are preferred.
- Open Source: Presentations on Open Source technology that interacts with Eclipse are better.
- Commerical Eclipse: Commercial products that are Eclipse focused are less good.
- Commercial Non Eclipse: Not appropriate for EclipseCon.