Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Eclipse/Status meetings/Minutes"

(p2 (Ian Bull))
(Discussion)
Line 31: Line 31:
  
 
* Should we collect status notes on a wiki?
 
* Should we collect status notes on a wiki?
 +
 +
* What build schedule would we like for Juno SR1 RC1? Our +0 day is 8/17 (then a week off, then RCs three weeks in a row).
 +
: Assume we'll be doing both 3.8.1 and 4.2.1 "in sync" (Though 4.2.1 is the official Juno SR1 deliverable).
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
 
[[Category:Eclipse_Platform_Status_Meetings| ]]
 
[[Category:Eclipse_Platform_Status_Meetings| ]]

Revision as of 16:49, 7 August 2012

Architecture, Status, Team Planning Call

Status

Platform Workspace

Platform User Assistance

Platform UI

Platform Text (Dani)

  • working towards Kepler M1 (one day test pass, bug fixing, N&N)
  • Juno SR1 status: no bug fixes planned so far

Platform Search

Platform Debug (Michael Rennie)

  • Holidays

Platform Ant (Michael Rennie)

  • Holidays

Platform SWT

Platform Releng

JDT Core

JDT Debug

JDT UI & Text (Dani)

  • working towards Kepler M1 (one day test pass, bug fixing, N&N)
  • Juno SR1 status: fixed 2 bugs - no further bug fixes planned to fix so far

PDE

Equinox (Tom Watson)

Equinox p2 (Ian Bull)

Discussion

  • Should we collect status notes on a wiki?
  • What build schedule would we like for Juno SR1 RC1? Our +0 day is 8/17 (then a week off, then RCs three weeks in a row).
Assume we'll be doing both 3.8.1 and 4.2.1 "in sync" (Though 4.2.1 is the official Juno SR1 deliverable).

Back to the top