Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Eclipse/PMC"

(125 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
= Meeting Schedule =
 
= Meeting Schedule =
  
−
The [http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/team-leaders.php Eclipse Project PMC] has a weekly phone meeting '''every wednesday at 10.30am EST'''.
+
The [http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/team-leaders.php Eclipse Project PMC] has a weekly phone meeting '''every Tuesday at 11.00am EST'''.
  
 
= Meeting Minutes =
 
= Meeting Minutes =
  
−
July 1, 2015 -- no meeting
+
'''Dec 6, 2016''' - Dani, Alex, Martin
 +
* McQ talked to Tom Watson about Equinox moving to Platform - Tom wants to discuss with the RT PMC
 +
* Alex: '''Update on Wayland'''
 +
** Fedora 25 shipping with Wayland by default
 +
** Wayland back-end for SWT is a patch in progress, some events not delivered, others incorrectly
 +
** Hoping to be in good shape by M5.
 +
** Until then, Gnome can be started on X11 with additional packages installed.
 +
** If Wayland is needed, the XWayland compatibility layer does work although slow (some drawing can be seen)
 +
** Some rewrite in the Launcher will be needed due to the security model - each window is isolated
 +
* Dani: '''How we test milestones''' - people putting in features sometimes don't seem to participate in the milestone week
 +
** McQ: Agrees that a good deal of manual testing is needed to cover flows that developers actually use
 +
** Alex: If milestone week overlaps with other duties (outside Platform) those other duties often take precedence
 +
** Test automation doesn't help for new features that add UI
 +
** Sergey distributes I-Builds so regressions are often found early - but there's no firm data on quality. Alex also distributes / uses I-Builds.
 +
** McQ thinks that some confidence in quality is needed, before I-builds are given out
 +
** Dani: Dogfooding helps a lot more than test plans.
 +
** ''To be discussed next week when there are more people on the call''
 +
* 4.6.2 looking good; M4 test pass today for releasing on Friday
 +
* Oxygen plan hasn't seen comments, so will only put Java 9 updates in there
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''June 24, 2015''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex
+
'''Nov 29, 2016''' - Dani, McQ, Sergey, Alex, Lars, Martin
−
* Dani: '''Java 9''' - <a href="http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/eclipse-java%E2%84%A2-9-support-beta-mars">EAR Feature Patch</a> on the Marketplace NOW
+
* Sergey: '''Understaffed Projects Announcement''' - should it be sent to a wider audience?
−
** No JARs any more - JRE is doing things internally using "jimage" format; updated search etc to create projects and work against them
+
** Was sent to eclipse-dev with cc: eclipse-pmc
−
** If the Jimage filesystem provider isn't backported, one has to run the IDE on Java9 in order to code Java9
+
** Dani suggest checking the mailing list archives or via RSS eg [https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev eclipse-dev mailing list home]
−
** Modules are just a list of packages (and can refer to other modules) - no real JSR describing the plan yet - seems like just a replacement of "Profiles" (and JARs)
+
** '''AI Dani''': send Sergey some links
 +
* Martin: Is it clear enough what contributors could do if they feel not being heard?
 +
** There is a forum and developer mailing lists, so for the Eclipse project we are probably good
 +
** Dani: The README.txt on top of the repo looks like a very good place for such kind of information
 +
** '''AI Martin''' review a couple READMEs and then make suggestions on the eclipse-pmc mailing list
 +
* Dani: RC4 - no build currently planned will push RC3. There's also Oxygen M4 next week.
 +
** Need to move out some planned bugzilla's targeted M4 (platform.ui: Lars to help, core: Sergey)
 +
** JDT UI is tight since Noopur is on vacation and Markus is very busy with Java 9 and HiDPI work
 +
* New process in place for the IP Log, IP log for Neon Update 2 (4.6.2) got approved today; Review is scheduled and ends on Dec.21
 +
* JDT Language Server: Still some blockers on the IP Work (hackathon contributions)
 +
* '''AI All''' Plan Update for Oxygen M4 {{bug|499768}}; Dani will update the Java 9 info
 +
* Lars: '''Approvals for Equinox'''
 +
** RT PMC don't have meetings or a process in place for approvals
 +
** They think that the Eclipse PMC is in a better position to approve Equinox
 +
** But why is Equinox on the RT PMC after all, does that still make sense? After all builds are done by Eclipse.
 +
** '''AI Dani''' discuss with Tom
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''June 17, 2015''' - Dani, John, Martin, Alex
+
'''Nov 22, 2016''' - Dani, Martin, Sergey, Alex, McQ (Regrets: Lars - travelling)
−
* John: '''Mars''' Platform in good shape for Mars - EPP respin for Error Reporting
+
* McQ: Simplify adding committers to understaffed projects
−
* Dani: '''Crashes with Java 8''' - Potentially will add to the online README
+
** '''AI Sergey''' final Polish on Lars' proposal + suggestions as discussed
−
** Happens in the JIT, with latest Oracle Java 8 (with 8 Cores and very specific circumstances)
+
* Martin: {{bug|498116}} download servers are hosed every Tuesday
−
** See {{Bug|465693}} - Probably https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078262
+
** PMC agrees to trying a fix for Neon.2 - this kind of issues is important (Android also ran into this kind of issue 2 years ago)
−
* Alex: '''XDG Application''' - looks like Docker but a similar idea
+
** Dani: we can encourage them to fix it, but EPP and Equinox are not governed by our PMC
−
** Environment description of the runtime - helps specifying the line-up of library versions that we test against and use
+
* Dani: '''Neon.3 Planning'''
−
** Big part of GNOME / GTK already pushing for it, might make sense to consider alignment
+
* Dani: '''FEEP Discussions''' on the [https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders] mailing list
−
** GNOME working towards compiling with a really old compiler, such that the physically identical bits can run against a large set of distros
+
** Voting will be more open this time
−
** See https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/SandboxedApps
+
* Dani: '''IP Log for Neon.2''' - Endgame looking good, no planned fixes known at this time, but if there's a fix for {{bug|498116}}, we will consume it
−
** But if you want to try it out please read https://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2015/06/17/testing-rawhide-apps-using-xdg-app/
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
 
+
'''Nov 15, 2016''' - Dani, Sergey, Alex, Martin, Lars, McQ
−
'''June 10, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin
+
* Dani: Neon.2 Release Review went out, IP Log will come early Dec.
−
* Dani: 4.5RC4 looking good, no more fixes planned
+
* Dani: RC2 build tomorrow + test pass on Wed - last build before PMC approval is required
−
* Dani: Working on Java 9 feature patch
+
* Dani: Bugzilla 4.6.3 milestone created - currently too many bugs targeted 4.6.2, suggest moving out except if there's a patch attached
−
* Alex: PC discussing a change in the release train
+
* Alex: '''Lucene''' - Using Lucene 6 for Platform.UI Indexing, prebuilt indexes of doc bundles need updating
−
** Current common ground seems to be a request for more release points, and projects could decide whether they do features or maintenance
+
** Prebuilt indexes of older versions will not be used, the impact is just a slowdown on first startup of help
−
** From Platform point of view, stability is key. Some key contributors not interested doing
+
** Old-version prebuilt indexes will trigger an entry in the errorlog, so projects will know
−
** Martin: How to also cater to contributors who want their contributions released soon ?
+
** Q: How much should we push for having a single Lucene in the Release Train? (In Mars we had two)
−
*** Martin Idea: With Tycho, building the Platform is easier so ask contributors build themselves
+
*** Problem: Moving to Lucene 6 is real porting effort, and it is not possible to be backward compatible
−
*** Or, open up a new "experimental" stream ?
+
*** EGit or XText, who want to support multiple Eclipse versions, may be allowed to bind against other Lucene by exception; but Planning Council message should be to favor the latest by default
−
*** Dani Idea: Market milestone builds differently, as "fully consumable" would serve the same purpose
+
** Martin: Help Search Result Quality -- Was often critisized due to bad analyzers -- has it improved ?
−
* Martin: Tested eclipse-installer (Oomph), looking really really good now
+
*** Alex: Lucene 6 has apparently improved things, but team has not explicitly tested these cases
 +
* All: '''Understaffed Projects Discussion'''
 +
** Dani: Would like to send the message in a positive way: As a tool for interested parties to gain access to the code, and a tool for understaffed projects to bring in committers
 +
** Alex: Would like to send the message, that Eclipse is open to contributions
 +
*** McQ: Yes, but not at the cost of making existing committers feel bad
 +
*** '''Lars''' to draft a new note (next week)
 +
* Lars: '''Mylyn Notification API'''
 +
** Still on Dani's list of items
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''June 3, 2015''' - Alex, Dani, Martin, McQ, John
+
'''Nov 8, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Sergey, Lars, Dani, Alex
−
* Dani: '''Mars Endgame'''
+
* Dani: '''Update on N-Builds'''
−
* Dani: Please vote for release review
+
** Releng team will drop N-builds - will also reduce work on the Releng team
 +
** Retention policies will need to be updated on I-Builds (keep weekly I-Builds)
 +
** Provide a Hudson job which can mark an I-Build as unstable in case it isn't good
 +
* Dani: '''Neon.2'''
 +
** Feature Freeze today - Release Review just listing the N&N
 +
** There was some new API, but it was backported mostly for bug fixes ... nothing relevant for the N&N
 +
** Agreement that release reviews should be minimal effort - there was never community feedback on the reviews.
 +
* Lars: '''Code Reviews on Understaffed Projects'''
 +
** Make it easier for known, good people to get access to the code base for reviewing patches
 +
** We'd still need to know the people - don't offer commit rights to random people
 +
** Refactorings: Valuable if done by committers, but reviewing patches that are produced by refactorings is too hard
 +
** Making someone a committer is preferred if there is some commitment to doing work moving forward
 +
** Sergey: There's too many unreviewed patches against Platform in some areas - we need more committers.
 +
** Proposal: '''Offer a shortcut for committers on one component who express interest in another component.'''
 +
*** Criteria: Provided contributions in the past, and shows interest moving forward.
 +
*** Don't offer commit rights just for one contribution.
 +
*** Consider merging components if a component has become so small that it's unnecessarily hard to contribute
 +
**** On a case by case basis, only if we think that merging components would solve more problems than creating new ones.
 +
** Dani: Who makes the decision on shortcuts - existing committers, or PMC ?
 +
*** In most cases, committers should have the say - but PMC may interfere if a project looks dysfunctional.
 +
*** '''AI Alex''' will write up proposed statement
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''May 20, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ
+
'''Nov 1, 2016''' - McQ, Sergey, Lars, Dani, Alex
−
* Dani: '''Security Update''' - Platform work done, Orbit updated, reached out to Wayne and other affected projects.
+
−
* Dani: '''RC2 Build''' - too many bugs assigned, Lars on Vacation, Dani will fill in
+
−
* McQ: '''Too Many Platforms Built?''' - Who's really hurt by "too many builds" ?
+
−
** Will meet with Mike & Foundation tomorrow, Alex is also interested (Dani to check).
+
  
−
<hr/>
+
We agreed on the following changes:
−
'''May 13, 2015''' - McQ, John, Alex, Martin
+
−
* John, Dani - Mars Endgame looking good
+
−
* Alex - {{bug|465874}} Lucene 5 looking good, almost done - Ready to commit as soon as CQs are in and Mars+1 is open
+
−
* JDT for Java 9 - will need a wider discussion with EMO on make it easier to publish the work, e.g. in normal builds
+
  
−
<hr/>
+
* Create maintenance branch immediately after RC1 instead of after the release. Use the maintenance branch to produce the upcoming release.
−
'''May 6, 2015''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, John
+
* Eliminate all code freezes on the main branch for RC releases, except for 1-2 days after RC1 before the maintenance branch is created. Freezes to allow test for milestone builds will still be applied (milestone freezes).
−
* Dani: '''Java 9 timing''' - slight delay
+
* We decided that we will only have ‘I’-like builds, using always signing.
−
* Dani: RC1 preps
+
* We decided to revisit the decision to always ship from master, but that's a longer discussion and won't happen soon.
−
** 2-day test pass went fine - 2 severe issues found, will be addressed
+
−
** Request to watch PMC mailing list for API exceptions and defect approvals
+
−
* John: '''PC Discussion on Release Cycles'''
+
−
** Multiple releases per year PLUS maintenance streams seems like overkill
+
−
** Consider an approach like Orion that just moves constantly forward
+
−
** Especially for the Platform, being rock solid is most important. Still to attract new contributors we need to allow more frequent "feature updates".
+
−
*** A model where both "stable/maintenance" _and_ "features" are contributed to the train might be too much work/overhead.
+
−
*** Consider a model like Ubuntu, ... with some release numbers being "stable/LTS base" and others being "in-between feature releases" ?
+
−
*** Consider a model like LTS for maintenance fixes / aside mainstream just moving forward ?
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
'''April 15, 2015''' - Dani, John, McQ, Alex, Martin
+
−
* Dani: '''Java 1.7 Changes'''
+
−
** Some bundles have been moved to a 1.7 BREE by new committers, even after API freeze
+
−
** Rule has always been "we move up when there's a reason to move up". We won't move up without reason.
+
−
*** Dani: Moving the BREE may even cause API changes, so should only be done when incrementing the minor version (5% risk)
+
−
*** Alex: Such updates allow staying current and not get to "rewrite is needed" state (thus needed) but has to happen before M6 (API freeze)
+
−
** Alex suggest not accepting additional changes, but not reverting either (to avoid churn)
+
−
* Dani: '''Batik 1.6 update'''
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''April 8, 2015''' - Dani, Martin, Alex, John, McQ
+
'''Oct 18, 2016''' - McQ, Sergey, Martin, Dani, Alex
−
* Dani: '''Batik''' - Platform is good, Train may need to update, perhaps updating one bundle only would suffice. John will follow up.
+
* Dani: '''PMC Approval for Sergey co-lead on Resources''' (Done)
−
* Alex: '''SWT for GTK 3 News'''
+
* Alex: '''Lucene Update'''
−
** GTK port finally decoupled from X11 - it renders on Wayland now, can switch the renderer to a pure HTML one
+
** Looking at updating to 6.x in Oxygen - CQs ongoing for Orbit - hoping to make M4
−
** This opens up opportunities (but depends on hosts that have GTK).
+
** Others like Mylyn, Pydev, ... use Lucene 5.x at this time; others consume the Platform
−
 
+
** There is some potential breaking things but should be fine since multiple Lucene's in parallel can work.
 +
** If an old pre-built help index can not be read, a new one is generated (Performance hit on the first run)
 +
** Dani: No issue, will also update Jetty in M4
 +
* Dani: Would like to open '''eclipse.jdt''' repository and corresponding sub-project to all JDT committers (currently only used for the JDT feature)
 +
** The project is almost dead with only 2 active committers, since new JDT leads were not voted in
 +
** Changes to feature will be rare, and Dani agrees to review
 +
** Allows to put the Oomph setup file into a shared place where all JDT committers have access
 +
** PROPOSAL AGREED by all.
 +
* EclipseCon Europe next week - Dani, Lars and Alex will be there - will '''cancel next week's meeting'''
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''April 1, 2015''' - McQ, Alex, Martin, Dani (Regrets: John travelling)
+
'''Oct 11, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Lars, Alex, Sergey
−
* Alex: '''GTK 3.16''' seeing issues again - fixed some crashes, but scrolling is still entirely broken
+
* Dani: '''Neon Update 2 Endgame Plan sent''' - thanks for the feedback
−
** SWT uses a number of things that GTK declares as "implementation detail"
+
* Sergey: We should talk about our release process.
−
* PMC approval on piggyback CQ's (AC question forwarded by John)
+
** McQ asked Sergey to start the discussion via e-mail
−
** Dani sent [https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse-pmc/msg02332.html our position] to John in order to update the AC
+
* McQ: What do you think about Devoxx and Eclipse Converge
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''March 18, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ, John
+
'''Oct 4, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Lars, Alex, Sergey
−
* John: '''EclipseCon''' - Bigger this year due to LocationTech (750 attendees)
+
* Dani: '''Neon Update 2 Endgame Plan''' - working on it
−
** Mark Reinhold keynote and "after-session" on Java 9
+
* Dani: '''Release Review'''
−
** Much interest in Orion JS tooling / editor, also on desktop
+
** In the past, features were not announced - now for 4.6.2, features + release review must be in by RC1
−
** Public face of Eclipse Platform at the conference was much more diverse than in the past (Lars Vogel, Max Anderson, Google ...)
+
** Will do the minimum necessary / required by EMO, for Update Releases.
−
* Dani: {{bug|458730}} '''Mars Plan Update'''
+
* Lars: '''p2 merge into Equinox status''' -
−
* Dani: '''e4 project leadership''' approved by EMO
+
* Sergey: '''Logistics of dealing with Service Releases'''
−
* Dani: Szymon Brandys resigned as Platform/Resources co-lead. Need to +1 on the mailing list
+
** Managing version increments is very fragile and error-prone
 +
*** Discussion already happened, see {{bug|499164}} -- we'll not increment minor versions on backports even if API is added
 +
*** '''AI Dani''' send a note out to eclipse-dev again
 +
** '''New & Noteworthy / Features for Update Releases:'''
 +
*** If there's new features, there must be a New&Noteworthy for users (everyone agrees)
 +
*** What about doing two feature releases per year with one service release each ?
 +
**** Dani: Not having features in "some" releases would defeat what the Community wanted
 +
**** Alex thinks that allowing features every 6 months would calm down most demand for new features
 +
**** PMC Review of feature backports worked fine so far
 +
**** '''RESOLUTION''' Will not change the process before having it settle a bit
 +
***** McQ would love to see a single development stream all the time ...
 +
*** Would the Generic Editor be acceptable in a release before June 2017 ?
 +
**** Tentatively yes, it's a separate bundle not affecting other code, it matters to the Community, so why not...
 +
**** Martin: OK, but what about newly introduced API ... would it be declared "provisional" initially ?
 +
**** Dani: There's no such thing as "provisional API". Teams who decide on backporting must also decide on API.
 +
**** Sergey: CDT has done full feature release every quarter for some time now and hasn't screwed up API...
 +
**** Martin,Lars,Sergey: What about marking "fresh" API as "@noreference under construction" until it's hardened...
 +
***** McQ: Then declare APIs as official only once a year ?
 +
***** Wouldn't want to tie to a yearly cycle again ... but then we're back to the Version Numbering discussion...
 +
***** '''AI All''' continue discussion on mailing list or next week.
  
−
<hr/>
 
−
 
−
'''March 11, 2015 - no meeting (EclipseCon)'''
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
 
+
'''Sep 27, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Lars, Alex + Sergey Prigogin (guest)
−
'''March 4, 2015''' - Dani, McQ, Martin, John
+
* Discussion about PMC upstaffing
−
* Dani: '''e4 leadership''' - Dani will volunteer to co-lead
+
−
* Dani: '''BREEs''' - documentation about how to pick the EE
+
−
** Recommending the "earliest generally supported JRE that provides the capabilities you need"
+
−
** Would like an URL on the page pointing to the most recent plan (talking to Wayne)
+
−
* John: '''greatfix contest'''
+
−
** Dani: Working well - some very small contributions but some also very large (eg Customize Perspective fixes)
+
−
* John: '''EclipseCon''' - numbers looking good; join Planning Council Breakfast as delegate for Dani
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''February 25, 2015''' - Dani, Martin McQ
+
'''Sep 20, 2016''' - Martin, McQ, Dani, Lars, Alex
−
* No topics
+
* Resources Leadership - '''AI Dani''' reach out to Szymon
 +
* PMC upstaffing: Focus on large installs; UI Freeze monitor, code cleanup, solid solutions, focus on code reviews
 +
* Dani: '''Java 9 Moved to July 2017''' - AI Dani talk to the Planning Council, proposing an "Update 1" in July
 +
** Better for consumers, available via "just update", though little bit extra work (CQ + Release Review)
 +
** Schedule looks still aggressive when looking at specifications; need to keep the team motivated
 +
* Dani: '''SelectionListener SWT Change''' - reverted for M2 since more clients were affected than expected
 +
** Proposed change turned out to be source-incompatible - will look at a different approach
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''February 18, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin
+
'''Sep 13, 2016''' - Dani, McQ, Lars
−
* Alex: '''Building Native Launchers'''
+
* Upstaffing the PMC
−
** Current way of building is kinda unpredictable - even if getting some agreement on versions to use, results are kinda unpredictable
+
* Build failures due to an SWT Change
−
** Pushing towards Hudson RHEL builders at least at the EF to get more transparency and automation - attempt to mimic the infrastructure at IBM
+
−
** Looking at 3 primary architectures (at the EF) for Linux vs. secondary architectures (non-public builders potentially)
+
−
* Dani: Great initiative, but other (non-EF) builders must not be broken
+
−
** EF doesn't allow any commercial tools (but currently, e.g. Windows launchers are built with MSVS)
+
−
* Alex is willing to spend time to get Linux builds running; but can't help with other architectures
+
−
** Martin: great approach - for Windows, using a cross-compiler on Linux might be interesting (after Linux native works)
+
−
* Alex: This is just phase one - getting rid of the binaries in git repos might be phase 2 (since the checked-in binaries easily cause inconsistencies between Java and Native side)
+
−
** Martin: Checked-in binaries help consumers and contributors who just want to make a Java change
+
−
** Dani: Checked-in binaries are also used for comparing build results for expected vs accidental changes
+
−
 
+
−
* Alex: '''{{bug|459399}} - Policy for recommended minimum execution environments for bundles'''
+
−
** Dani: It works today
+
−
*** To run Eclipse, Java 8 or Java 9 can be used (minimum BREE has no impact)
+
−
*** To modify the source, a new JRE can be used but then the Execution Environment Descriptions need to be installed
+
−
** Policy as discussed in the past: Each project can increase the BREE if there is a real need (such as generifying) and no upstream clients are broken
+
−
*** But don't change the BREE without justification -- changing the BREE always has some effect, such as new warnings that would need to be addressed
+
−
*** Suggested BREE for new bundles has already been changed by Lars
+
−
* Alex: Even for bundles in "maintenance mode", old BREE causes issues for people who build from source (who have to change compilers etc)
+
−
* No conclusion so far (Alex and Dani disagree)
+
−
 
+
−
* Dani: '''e4 leadership'''
+
−
** Mature bits being moved to Eclipse - e4 remaining as an incubator to keep alive for experiments with low entry barrier
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''February 11, 2015''' - Dani, Alex
+
'''Sep 6, 2016''' - Dani, Lars, Alex, Martin
−
* no topics
+
* Dani: Thanks for approving Noopur
 +
* Dani: Java Language Server Proposal - at the Foundation, will be called "JDT Language Server"
 +
* Dani: RC4 - Fix for an Equinox p2 issue, only known issue being fixed, looking good
 +
* Dani: Looking at the generic code editor, would prefer moving some things to M3 (talking to Sopot and Mickael)
 +
* LTS: Market for paid fixes on old versions not quite as good as expected
 +
* Release Reviews: When is a feature considered an "important feature" ?
 +
** Important Features require a full release review thus lots of effort, avoided for Neon.1
 +
** '''AI Dani''' discuss in Planning Council call tomorrow
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
 +
<strike>Aug 30, 2016 - No topics</strike>
  
−
'''February 4, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin
+
<strike>Aug 23, 2016 - No topics</strike>
−
* Alex: With GTK-3.15.[345] , Eclipse is entirely unusable
+
−
** Alex has some dirty workarounds to make it start, but still many issues like trees not painted, ...
+
−
** Crash on startup identified to be GTK bug. Fix to be released in 3.15.6 https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=edec64cda3d4518b4e87d5ea5d287d4570ba9933
+
−
* Dani: Working on Solaris 64-bit
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
 
+
'''Aug 16, 2016''' - Dani, Martin, Lars
−
'''January 28, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, John
+
* Dani will not always be available next two weeks (Eclipse Summit India and IBM Bangalore team visit)
−
* Dani: Switch Mac OS X 10.9 with 10.10 in Mars target environments
+
** Please split the load on +1'ing backport/API requests - please do review the code and set the pmc+1 flag
−
** No objections
+
* Dani: '''{{bug|498106}} Oxygen Plan'''
−
* Alex: Looking for any Eclipse related activity @Fosdem
+
** Agreed by all so far, including removal of REL6 as a reference platform
 +
** Individual subproject Wikis look pretty consistent now
 +
** UNIX Platforms (Solaris,AIX,HP-UX) have been removed for M1
 +
*** PPC-Linux Releng was also removed but accidentally (due to a hardware failure), will be restored for M2.
 +
** No consensus on Ubuntu yet - will keep 14.04 in for now, consider taking out on the next update
 +
* Dani: '''{{bug|499164}} Version Numbering for Neon.1'''
 +
** The original "+5" or "+10" proposal showed some issues:
 +
** Update with skipping would propagate to features; no tooling; no real benefit of semantic versioning
 +
** '''AGREEMENT''' to keeping using the status quo for now ("allow small updates even with micro uprev only")
 +
* Lars: '''p2 pending patches'''
 +
** '''AI Dani''' send E-Mail to Tom - suggest reviews or merger p2 back to Platform
 +
* Dani: '''{{bug|499399}} Eclipse Infrastructure Stability'''
 +
** Denis is looking at it - maybe too many requests coming in ?
 +
* Lars: '''e4 spy and wizard migration to PDE'''
 +
** Dani: Are wizards e4 specific, or could they be used with JFace ?
 +
** New SWT Layout Spy should go to SWT, rather then keeping in PDE's Build
 +
** Some spies usable also in RCP Apps - for example the e4 model spy - 6 independent projects, dependency on emf.edit
 +
*** Looks like a big extension to PDE -- consider some consolidation and cleanup (tests, String externalization, ...)
 +
*** '''AI Lars''' to check if contributors would be willing to clean up as discussed, then moving into pde.ui would be fine.
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
  
−
'''January 21, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ
+
'''Aug 09, 2016''' - Dani
−
* Alex: '''Process for allowing non-committers extended bugzilla privileges (for bug triage)?'''
+
* no one joined - had private conversation with McQ later
−
** Dani: Yes a process exists. Send bugzilla username to Dani.
+
** '''guys, please announce when you can't join. I can make better use of my time than waiting for you in the call ;-) - thanks.'''
−
* Alex: '''New resource for helping with SWT'''
+
−
* Dani: '''Platform/UI co-lead'''
+
−
* Dani: Solaris: Java 8 will only support 64 bits on both Intel and SPARC --&gt; IBM SWT Team considering to invest in getting patches in for 64-bit Solaris
+
−
 
+
−
<hr/>
+
−
'''January 14, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ, John
+
−
* Dani: Update on Platform/UI Leadership: Daniel Rolka left IBM and for now has no time to contribute. He stepped down as co-lead and nominated Lars Vogel
+
−
* Dani: Solaris x86 64-bit support - patches exist, but no machine available. No luck to get one from Oracle or via Eclipse Foundation. We will not support Solaris x86 64-bit unless someone makes a machine available
+
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
  
−
'''January 7, 2015''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ, John
+
'''Aug 02, 2016''' - Dani, Martin, Alex
−
* Dani: '''Platform/UI Leadership'''
+
* Dani: New [https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/plans/eclipse_project_plan_4_7_draft.xml Oxygen Plan Format]
−
* John: '''Git security issue''' - pick up a patch for Jgit in the packages before SR2? - Mostly an EPP
+
** '''AI Dani''' ask Denis about aggregating the Sub Wiki's into the master page
−
<hr/>
+
* Alex: SWT Fragments for ARM64 etc
−
 
+
** Tycho doesn't support auto-selecting fragments - in contact with Jan and Tobias
−
'''December 17, 2014''' - McQ, John, Dani
+
** Dani: Would like to revert changes - don't want to punish people who are not interested in fragments
−
* Platform UI leadership to be discussed in the next PMC call
+
** Not really an SWT problem, so editing .target files would be a clean solution
−
* no call on December 24 and December 31
+
** Will probably go with empty (dummy) fragments without natives, as that's the simplest solution
 +
* Dani: SWT team - Lakshmi going to Sweden, will not be available until end 2016
 +
** Arun is mostly back, Sravan is now on Releng
 +
** Need to push further on building at the Foundation!!
 +
** Alex: Getting CentOS for building ... but test machines are on SLES11, which is too old, will need at least SLES12
 +
*** Dani: Will need an owner at the Eclipse Foundation to ensure this proceeds ! Alex agreed to further drive this.
 +
* Target Env: Dropping REL6 -- reference platform for testing will only be REL7 (though will continue to run on REL6)
 +
** Reducing support level this year, in order to prepare for only supporting GTK3 next year
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''December 10, 2014''' - Alex, McQ, John, Dani, Martin
 
−
* Dani: {{bug|427768}} Mickael (Red Hat) - Nested Project support contribution to Common Navigator to better support Maven projects
 
−
* Dani: Red Hat also will wants to contribute making the Import easier {{bug|421930}}. First in the e4 incubator.
 
−
** Just import from a folder, and contribute project configurators via extension point (e.g. detect POM files, Makefiles, ...)
 
−
** McQ: Many complexities ... different users may want very different things to happen
 
−
*** McQ: Just point to a Git repo -- the Git repo has a little metadata file at the root which allows launching the apps that the repo had been intended for ... maybe just make the project tree(s) a little more self-describing
 
−
*** Is there a growing list of repos which already have that? - John: In the Java world, pom.xml is getting that ...
 
−
*** Alex: .doap getting this (at least for Apache and GNOME projects - specifies at least the languages used)
 
−
* Web IDEs : McQ and others gone through a lot of analysis of Web IDE's
 
−
** Cloud9 has a much larger set of starting points ; in terms of the underlying core structure, Orion (and also Jay) are more interesting
 
−
** Orion has an extremely lightweight plug-in model: pieces coming from all over the world may look like all running on the server - nice infrastructure for building Community around it
 
−
** Orion + Flux could be a rival for anything out there
 
−
** Orion continues to push on the Core Coding experience - Orion Editor is on par or better than most desktop editors
 
−
* Vision: See [https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/platform-vision/msg00065.html Minutes on the platform-vision mailing list] ... Delivery will depend on people actually participating
 
  
−
<hr/>
+
'''July 26, 2016''' - no meeting
−
'''December 3, 2014''' - Alex, Martin, Dani, John (McQ travelling)
+
−
* John: [https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/platform-vision/ Platform Vision] - How to turn that into actionable items, Wayne wants to present to the Board
+
−
* John: '''Performance tests''' running again since a couple weeks, now the graphs are also back again :)
+
−
** See http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops4/I20141202-0800/performance.php
+
−
** Results are there but fingerprints currently missing
+
−
** Baseline is 4.4.0 at the moment (consider comparing against 3.x at some point)
+
−
** John: From experience, a single result isn't helpful, there's often weird anomalies from build to build ... need to look at trends over multiple builds, thus the graphs are really useful
+
  
−
<hr/>
+
'''July 19, 2016''' - no meeting
−
'''November 26, 2014''' - Alex, Dani
+
−
* No relevant topics / decisions
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''November 19, 2014''' - Alex, Martin, Dani  (''McQ and John had issues dialing in'')
+
'''July 12, 2016''' - McQ, Lars, Alex
−
* Dani: '''Jetty 9''' - Upgrade has been done, but new versions coming out ... will probably update from Jetty 9.2.3 to Jetty 9.2.5. Probably 9.3
+
* Dani: Hackathon summary
−
** WTP interested in newer Jetty version ... need to agree on a common version across the Release Train.
+
−
** Alex: New Jetty JSP compiler failing ... filed a bug, will want this fixed (Jetty working on it)
+
−
* Dani: '''{{bug|179924}} Request for ssh-agent''' - patch against Team from YMNK (JSch Committer)
+
−
** egit would contribute the agent, but would make more sense putting it in Platform (+1 from Martin, no objection from Alex)
+
−
* Equinox Declarative Services implementation - ProSyst stopped providing fixes, not responsive any more
+
−
** New specificiation (R6) from OSGi adding lot of features, cannot risk staying behind
+
−
** Suggestion to remove the ProSyst stuff and replace it with the Apache Felix implementation (used by IBM / WebSphere and others)
+
−
** Martin: How mature / stable is the Felix code ? Can we influence it ?
+
−
*** Dani: Very mature. Have more influence on Felix than on the Prosyst stuff ... through the IBM committers and others.
+
−
*** Alex agrees. Using some parts of Felix already.
+
−
* John (via Dani): '''Move e4 into Platform/UI''' - would like to start the review process next week.
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''November 5, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin
+
'''July 5, 2016''' - Lars, McQ, Alex, Dani, Martin
−
* Eclipse Foundation greatbugs initiative - call into PMC
+
* Lars: SWT move to Java 8
−
* Dani: EclipseCon Europe Report - met lot of people, best attended EclipseCon Europe ever :)
+
* Alex: Initial builds of GTK 2.24 for AIX - planning to bump minimum GTK version to 2.24
−
** IOT; IDE in the Web; are people moving away from Eclipse before the transition to Web can be completed ?
+
** Will remove non-cairo drawing, this is where most of the breakage happens
−
* Alex: Discussion with Christian Campo on scaling up
+
** Ubuntu 12.04: 2.24.10 / 3.4.5
−
** Should better go into SWT ... but SWT has a reputation that it's hard getting a change in -- people prefer re-doing things their own than contributing :(
+
** RHEL 6: 2.24.23-6
−
** Alex thinks this problem doesn't exist any more ... but how to fight this misconception ?
+
** AIX, HP-UX, Solaris ? -- Oxygen will only focus on Linux, Windows, Mac
−
** John: Getting a change in may now be hard due to other reasons, eg lack of experienced committers
+
** Secondary Platforms: Not built on EF Hardware, but interested parties can contribute binaries
−
** Alex: Consider voting in new committers more easily if somebody is interested ?
+
** Trying to support Platforms which can't move up to modern GTK at a similar pace as Linux is hard
−
* Alex: Difference between Eclipse and the Linux Foundation
+
** '''AI Alex''' write up a message to the Community
−
** Linux Foundation doesn't provide anything that anybody can use directly (just a source tarball) --&gt; all users become "contributors" of some sort
+
* Lars: {{bug|486961}} extending the Eclipse Text Editor
−
** This leads to different expectations and has a number advantages (eg issues are reported to and worked on by member companies only)
+
** Dani: Text Editor must remain unchanged, but feel free to provide a new different code editor
−
 
+
** https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=496114#c7
−
'''October 22, 2014''' - Alex, Dani, McQ, John
+
** Not against adding extension points ... but having the standard text editor adopt those is a no-go
−
* Platform plan update nearly done, will be released soon
+
* Dani: Build, and Hackathon
−
* Orion release review is ongoing, release will be next week
+
−
* Brief discussion of new bug reporting tool and related bug [https://dev.eclipse.org/recommenders/committers/dashboard/#/dashboard/temp/e6leTB3gQy-zUZI-73KtRQ dashboard]
+
−
* PMC called '''canceled''' next week due to EclipseCon Europe
+
−
 
+
−
'''October 1, 2014''' - Alex, Dani, Martin, McQ
+
−
* Dani - In touch with Oracle regarding Solaris x86
+
−
* McQ - '''Platform UI''' tension between making Platform UI as stable as possible, versus new features
+
−
** Community forming for new contributions - that's great! - But takes committer's time; committers reduced to "productize and fix" is problematic
+
−
** how to get more contributions for bug fixes ?
+
−
*** Alex: What about saying "This release we only accept bug fixes" ? Or for some milestone, eg after M4 only accept bug fixes ?
+
−
*** Dani: Sounds great, but will the Community accept that ? - JDT BugBash did not work that well...
+
−
*** Dani to prepare a draft message
+
−
* Dani was in Bangalore - talked to Arun - good collaboration with Alex
+
−
** Hard to get new SWT developers (Sami moving away on RH side)
+
−
** Ideas to keep SWT relevant ... eg generate Browser based things
+
−
*** GTK3 supports running in a browser now... (just one label for now, but an interesting approach)
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''September 24, 2014''' - Alex, Dani, McQ, John, Martin
+
'''June 28, 2016''' - McQ, Martin, Alex
−
* John: '''SWT Binaries Repository''' has got too big
+
* Discussion about Language Server Protocol
−
** Will prune old versions out of the git repository (which is only used internally) - "Release" drops will still be available from release builds.
+
** MS sponsoring hackathon in Zurich, Dani expected to go there
−
** '''DECISION:''' OK to prune.
+
** The protocol has an Open Source license, but there is no Open Source Governance ... who owns the specification?
−
* '''SWT master still has sources for old Platforms''' like carbon and motif - cluttering up the source code
+
−
** '''DECISION:''' OK to remove references - source would remain in git for old branches, but not be visible in master any more.
+
−
* Dani: '''p2 and Equinox''' - no sign-off for M2, leaders stepping down ?
+
−
** consider moving p2 back into Equinox, and probably Equinox back into the Eclipse project ?
+
−
** John: Equinox committers not really knowledgeable about p2 ... still, with less than 3 active committers a threshold is reached (can't hold elections any more)
+
−
** Still there's a couple of people contributing, so there are knowledgeable folk around
+
−
** Dani: If there's committers committing code, they should also be responsible for sign-off
+
−
* Dani: '''Java 7 and Jetty 9'''
+
−
** Been using Jetty 8 for a while, now, there is Community Pressure upgrading to Jetty 9 but that requires Java 7
+
−
** Java 6 no longer getting public updates since February 2013
+
−
** John:Adoptions needed in the Help System when moving to Jetty 9 ?
+
−
*** Alex don't think so - been shipping Jetty 9 for over a year already; only required changing some dependencies.
+
−
*** '''ACTION ITEM: Alex offered to check this'''
+
−
* Alex: '''Drop all the Java 6 Platforms from the list of Reference Platforms?'''
+
−
** '''DECISION:''' Yes this needs to be done. Trying to support Java 6 won't buy any benefit at this point.
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''September 17, 2014''' - no meeting
+
'''June 21, 2016''' -  
 +
*
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''September 10, 2014''' - John, Martin, Alex, Dani
+
'''June 14, 2016''' - Dani, McQ, Martin, Lars
−
* John: Mars having some build hickups due to removing Mac 32-bit builds
+
* McQ: '''Mattermost / Slack''' for communication
−
* John: Luna SR1 - almost done, respinning for 2 bugs in Equinox
+
** not much different than newsgroup or IRC, but very dynamic when everybody is on it
−
* John: Cloud TLP (for Orion and others) - still on track for announcing end October
+
* Lars: '''Master is Open'''
−
* Alex: Been busy with other stuff recently, back on the GTK version support discussion this week
+
** Dani: Simple story - if we do need an emergency build we would create the maintenance branch on demand based on the tag
−
** Martin: Many people will know what distro they have (or need), but not what GTK they have on there
+
** Only limitation: We can't update the parent pom's at this time
−
*** John: Also running GTK on AIX, Solaris, Linux Power and other which are not moving up that fast...
+
** Don't have tools to check if the MANIFEST.MF needs to update - only API Tooling for API changes, but nothing for micro changes ({{bug|360703}}) is open to improve that)
−
*** Martin: Examples: RHEL 5.8 was GTK 2.10.4-21 ; RHEL 4.5 was at GTK 2.4.13-22
+
** We do have an alert if there's no version/source change but the binaries changed (e.g. due to a compiler update) but that's not in the workspace
−
*** Popular distros would be Ubuntu LTS, RHEL, OpenSUSE
+
* Lars: '''Upgrade SWT to Java 8 for Oxygen ?''' - to be decided by the SWT team, the PMC is OK with the update if the SWT team decide so
−
** Alex: Newer distros have up to 3 GTK versions installed, along with some means to switch between them, it's very confusing
+
* McQ: '''Language API -- Overlap between Orion and Che''' (from [https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ide-dev/ ide-dev] mailing list and {{bug|496114}})
−
** Eclipse is the only project that dynamically loads DLL's and tries to support a broad range ... others typically compile against a specific version
+
** The protocol is pretty big, but well documented - looks like an improved version of Flux
−
*** Most projects require GTK 2.24
+
** The protocol is generic, implementations need to be specific -- some implementations already ongoing (Javascript)
−
** John: GTK versions are not really predictable ... between 3.04 and 3.10 there was a breaking change
+
*** People start working on editors hooking up to the protocol -- does it make sense building a JDT Language Server ?
−
** Alex: In every release there are small issues that we work around; and there's certain releases that are breaking stuff
+
** The tricky part is, that the Che workspace model is very different than the Eclipse workspace
−
** '''NEXT ACTION: Send E-Mail'''
+
** How to create a small lightweight server that would scale -- one workspace per user may not scale
 +
*** At the beginning, it would be less powerful than JDT today since context would be lacking
 +
*** But the direction is very interesting ... though maybe too many people are implementing the same thing right now
 +
* Dani: '''What goes into the Neon Update Releases'''
 +
** as discussed on May 17 (see below): Must be in master first, consider for backport after that
 +
** '''AI: Dani''' will prepare a note
 +
* Dani: '''Using Sound in Eclipse'''
 +
** Eric Rizzo uploaded a feature to provide different sounds for successful or failed JUnit tests (see {{bug|496003}})
 +
** Martin: CDT has allowed sound for breakpoint actions since long
 +
** Lars: Moving the Mylyn notification framework to Platform UI was on the plan already, now considered for Oxygen
 +
** McQ: Every Platform has an OS-Level Notification system so '''that''' should really be leveraged
 +
** Martin: Mylyn notifications can be "active", can OS notifications also be active ? - McQ thinks yes
 +
** Could work on SWT implementation of host platform notifications in parallel to pushing down the Mylyn API
 +
** Request on specific JUnit sounds not yet decided.
  
−
<hr/>
+
'''June 7, 2016''' - Dani, McQ, Alex
−
'''September 3, 2014''' - John, Alex, Dani
+
* no topics
−
* Dani: away next week and on/off the next two weeks due to travel
+
−
* Dani: RC4 next week. PMC please watch the PMC mailing list
+
−
** John: will be available and monitor the mailing list
+
−
* Dani: Oracle interested in providing access to a Solaris 64-bit machine {{bug|442266}}
+
−
* John: How/where to graduate the e4 tools
+
−
** the community wants to graduate this out of incubation
+
−
** initially proposed to create a separate project, but feels like adding too much overhead
+
−
** John: proposed PDE as home, then Dani suggested to use Platform UI
+
−
** Alex, Dani and John agree to suggest Platform UI as home for the e4 tools.
+
−
** John to send a note to Lars
+
−
* Alex: Limit supported number of GTK+ versions
+
−
** SWT currently has to support over 20 different version. This doesn't scale.
+
−
** Proposal: Bump min supported version with one minor release each release. Aka Luna has Gtk 2.10 as min, Mars would have 2.12 as min. Can consider even two minor releases (Mars requires 2.14) as this would keep the amount of supported versions the same as GTK releases one minor release every 6 months.
+
−
** Dani, John: this is too limiting. We tended to support the most possible. Newest versions might have too many bugs.
+
−
** All agree: we'd like to limit the amount of supported versions
+
−
** Alex to cast a poll via Eclipse Foundation, which versions are used by users and companies
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
 
+
'''May 31, 2016''' - Dani, Martin, Lars, McQ, Alex
−
'''August 27, 2014''' - cancelled
+
* Dani: '''IP Log'''
 +
** The tool did not work, but it was manually submitted and approved
 +
** In previous years, some people wanted the IP Log to not be so publicly visible, so now only project leads can generate and submit it
 +
* Dani: '''Release Review'''
 +
** Reply to the public E-Mail with comments or +1
 +
* Dani: '''Update Jetty to 3.9.3'''
 +
** Consensus to update - Jetty team working on fixing their update site
 +
* Dani: '''RC4 Status Update'''
 +
** Cooling down - maybe 2 fixes from SWT, 1 in Platform/Text Search, and the approved doc fix for deprecating the mac command
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
 
+
'''May 24, 2016''' - Dani, Lars, Martin
−
'''August 20, 2014''' - John, Alex, Dani
+
* Dani: '''IP Log Generator''' - New version is unable to deal with Eclipse Project, Wayne is working on it
−
* Dani: new platform PowerPC 64-bit LE {{bug|441358 }}
+
* Dani: '''Release Review''' - Deadline next week (June 2)
−
** maintained by IBM
+
* Dani: '''Deprecation Request from Brian'''
−
** will be added to 4.4.1 as early access
+
** Command org.eclipse.ui.cocoa.fullscreenWindow -- all PMC agree on the deprecation although late, since it only affects docs
−
** Dani to send a note to cross-platform
+
* Dani: '''Copyright End Date'''
−
* Dani: individual made patches to support Solaris 64-bit {{bug|442266}}
+
** '''AGREEMENT''' to no longer require updating the end date (though committers are still ALLOWED to update it)
−
** we'd like to add it but don't have a machine to support it
+
** Will no longer run the automated copyright tool (actually haven't run it the past 3 releases)
−
** important because our current 32-bit Solaris build will become obselete since there's no 32-bit JRE for Java 7 and beyond
+
** Will live with the source code notices being inaccurate / incomplete - the accurate state is in Git
−
** Oracle should be interested since they provide both, Java and Solaris
+
** This is acknowledged to not be ideal, but the best compromise we can come up with since "bulk changes" are not OK
−
** Dani to ask Oracle
+
* Dani: '''Neon Status'''
 +
** Java 9 launching - affects all Java consumers, not clear yet what Oracle will do, no plan changing Equinox/Launcher at this time
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
 
+
'''May 17, 2016''' - Dani, Lars, Martin, Alex
−
'''August 13, 2014''' - McQ, Alex, Dani
+
* Dani: '''{{Bug|475184}} Neon Plan Update 2'''
−
* Dani: Any feedback for the [https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/plans/eclipse_project_plan_4_5.xml Mars plan]?
+
** Windows 10 and Ubuntu 16.04 will be added as "active" Platforms that people do work on
−
** McQ:
+
** SWT would like to remove Windows 8 and Ubuntu 12.04 from the list of reference Platforms
−
*** It does not cover Orion, but that is OK and like in previous release plans. Orion will most likely be moved to another top-level project soon.
+
*** Alex: Ubuntu 12.04 has GTK 3.10 which is hard to support
−
*** We want to remove Mac OS X Universal 32-bit (all agreed)
+
**** Correction (Markus): Ubuntu 12.04 has GTK 3.4.2. Ubuntu 14.04 has GTK 3.10.8
−
* Dani: How to deal with requests to push our bundles to repo.eclipse.org {{bug|441530}}
+
*** Message is clear: "Supposed to run on older Platforms, but these are the primary ones" - including last 2 LTS ones
−
** Dani: OK for me but we won't do the work
+
** Agreement to keep Windows 7 and remove Windows 8
−
** Alex: Maven needs the dependencies in the pom.xml. We don't want copy them from the manifest into the pom.xml and then maintain this. The pom should be updated when publishing the file into the Maven repo. Ideally by an automated task.
+
** '''AI Dani''' to check if SuSE 11 is right (12 been out since 2 years)
−
** Conclusion: all agree with this, i.e. we won't do the actual work and we won't "pollute" our pom files.
+
* Dani: '''Copyright End Date''' - EMO: To be decided per project
 +
** IBMers will have to continue updating the copyright end date, regardless of what other companies do
 +
** Copyright tool: Only the person who made a change is allowed to update the Copyright notice
 +
*** gray area: actually fixing the date can be considered a change
 +
** Alex is in favor of consistency across the project
 +
* Dani: '''Policy for Neon.Update Releases''' - What to allow in, which rules to apply on the endgame
 +
** Martin: Fact is, that the Update stream is built less often, and thus also tested less often
 +
** Rule: Any fix or feature must be in master first (and may be backported thereafter)
 +
** Will want "some" features in Update, but probably not all of them - '''decision''': discuss feature by feature at PMC
 +
** Stakeholder who's interested in a backport must send a quick note to the PMC (just like for API change requests)
 +
** In case too many requests should come in, could still discuss updating the procedure
 +
* Dani: '''Neon RC2 Builds Update'''
 +
** Currently looking good, but latest Java 9 Launchers broke the Annotation support - investigating
 +
** Quality generally looking good - "Stock GTK3" very stable now
 +
** GTK3 on SuSE, Fedora looking much better than Mars (at least with a GNOME shell)
 +
** Lars: {{bug|493477}} detached editors broken on GTK2 nominating for RC
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''August 6, 2014''' - McQ, Dani
+
'''May 10, 2016''' - Dani, Martin, Alex, McQ
−
* Dani: Will provide initial Mars plan next week
+
* Dani: '''Policy for what should go into Neon.Update Releases'''
−
 
+
** Would like to be more flexible than in the past - discussion point for next week
 +
* Martin: '''RHEL7 -- GTK3 versus --launcher.GTK_Version 2'''
 +
** GTK2 rendering still much more reliable than GTK 3 - forced to release commercial software with the GTK2 fallback for now
 +
*** Drawback: Even with MATE desktop using GTK2 (for accessibility), the Browser widget webkitgtk2 is not easy to get since not in the official repos
 +
** Alex: Desktops are moving faster - adopting change very quickly - cannot keep up with the investment that the Community currently makes in SWT
 +
*** Heavily limiting what we support looks like the only viable approach at the moment...
 +
*** There's 2 big groups of bugs: (a) "Next" version of GTK, and (b) "Old" version like Ubuntu 13.04 which has 3.10 - can we limit support to "latest" ?
 +
*** Martin: Need "LTS" Linux (RHEL 7, RHEL 6, Ubuntu 12, 14 - soon 16).
 +
** Alex: Gnome people have come up with a "Container environment" for GTK - could ship Eclipse that way ?
 +
*** Limitations: Updates must come through this application - already using Gimp from such an environment
 +
*** Might be able to deliver Eclipse that way next year (Oxygen)
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''No meetings in July'''
+
'''May 3, 2016''' - Dani, Martin, Alex, McQ
 +
* [https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse-pmc/msg02598.html Brian's request on the PMC list]
 +
** McQ: Why would we care about adding small enhancements in RC1 when we should focus on testing and critical fixes
 +
** Dani: Two parts in the change - the original one (approvable), but another change also sneaked in (enable the prefix search) - not approvable
 +
** Alex: People don't want to wait for getting in an improvement...
 +
** McQ: OK for adding as feature to Neon.1 , but Neon.0 should be focused on bug fixes
 +
** Keep in Gerrit for now - Neon.1 stream is typically opened when no new changes are expected. Rebasing is relatively easy from Gerrit.
 +
** '''ACTION''' McQ to -1 and argue why.
  
 +
* Alex: '''Update on Accessibility'''
 +
** broken since GTK 3.8 where accessibility is no longer a module but shipped with GTK itself
 +
** due to that, the way accessibility is implemented is totally different - no more factories - experimenting with possible approaches
 +
** Discussing the addition of Eclipse to their test infrastructure, at a meeting a month from now
 +
*** and even so, not sure how well accessibility is tested in GTK itself
 +
** Launching with -gtk_version 2 is not a workaround, because the v2 GTK doesn't register as an accessible application in newer desktops !
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''Jun 4, 2014''' - Dani, John, Martin, McQ, Alex
+
'''April 26, 2016''' - Dani, Lars, Alex, Martin, McQ
−
* Dani: '''RC4 Status''' looking good
+
* Mickael's API change request ... tried to address feedback from Markus but then got no additional feedback
−
** 1 bug in JDT, 1 bug in Debug and 1 in Platform/UI on Linux being investigated ("Show In" no longer working)
+
* Alex: '''Accessibility''' - broken on recent GNOME and probably others
−
** Rest of the team working on docs
+
** Accessibility is important. Have reports from users who say "Eclipse works for them"
−
** Alex: On Ubuntu, might want to disable UBUNTU_MENUPROXY ... this is causing a lot of issues
+
** McQ: Need to keep some focus and look at what we can do for Neon.1
−
* John: '''Went over the N&N''' ... number of things went in after M7 :)
+
* Alex: '''Platform.ui generification of project'''
−
** Dark Theme - Good story in place combining the old 3.x Presentation API with the new E4 (CSS) technology in a good way
+
** Dani: Won't get a consistent story when done piecemeal - needs to be done "per framework" and not necessarily "per plugin"
 +
** McQ: It's a huge effort - enough by itself for one whole release !
 +
** Dani: If a meaningful separate unit is found that can be done, but things like e.g. LabelProvider, ContentProvider and TreeViewer can't be done isolated
 +
** Lars: If a smaller unit of generification work is possible, that's permitted when somebody signs up for the work and it has been discussed in the public
 +
** '''ACTION Alex''' to prepare a message for review and then send that.
 +
* Lars: '''Copyright discussion'''
 +
** Not having the end date in the copyright notice makes the copyright invalid.
 +
** The IP Advisory Board will discuss it again.
 +
* Dani: '''Update on FEEP'''
 +
** Paul not reached out yet
 +
** A list now shows what's done or in progress - but no time
 +
* Dani: '''Update on M7'''
 +
** Last 4 builds failed due to infrastructure issues - Maven stuff could not be accessed
 +
** Will try to enable cache on the build side and re-try until the cache is full
  
 +
<br/>
 +
'''April 19, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex (regrets: Lars)
 +
* Dani: '''IP Stuff''' on Copyright Updates pinged the Lawyers but no update yet, need to wait
 +
* Dani: '''FEEP''' discussed on AC, People were sympathetic to our issues.
 +
** General direction that FEEP sponsored work is no different than other contributions
 +
** Wayne took the Action Item setting up a meeting with Paul and interested parties.
 +
** Website with ongoing FEEP still pending - Dani is tracking
 +
* Dani: '''All PMC please review and +1 API requests''' when you find time
 +
** McQ does review and typically ask question but not close enough to the code to +1
 +
** '''AGREEMENT''' on "+0" votes to express "no objections but others should approve too
 +
* '''Reviews vs. Features'''
 +
** Alex: Badge System was quite successful at Fedora
  
−
<hr/>
+
<br/>
−
'''Jun 11, 2014''' - Martin, McQ, Alex, John
+
'''April 12, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Lars, Alex
−
* John: Eclipse Theming: When switching the OS Theme to dark, Eclipse should be aware
+
* Lars: '''Get rid of the Copyright Year Update Requirement'''
−
** Dark Theme is currently a tech preview
+
** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=485257#c13 bug 485257_c13] EMO: All information is in the git repos
 +
** McQ: OK lifting the requirement but doesn't want wrong information in files .. get rid of all copyright years ?
 +
** Dani: Replacing the end-date by "[see git]" might be an option
 +
** '''ACTION''' McQ or Dani talk to IBM Legal, then decide next week
  
 +
* Lars: '''{{bug|490012}} Remove Project Settings to force strictly compatible JRE'''
 +
** Example: When don't have admin rights on a customer machine, can't install anything
 +
** Dani: With the Gerrit Build Validation, the risk of getting unbuildable code is no longer there
 +
** Proposal: Project requests a particular JRE, but the workspace configures treating this as an error or warning
 +
** '''DECISION''' to get rid of the strict error per project.
  
−
<hr/>
+
* Dani: '''{{bug|475934}} API Change on model processing order'''
−
'''Jun 4, 2014''' - Dani, John, Martin, McQ, Alex
+
** Dani: Even if this fixes an issue, M7 is late in the game
−
* Dani: '''RC4 Status''' looking good
+
** McQ: Does API specify the order of events? - No; only on internal method.
−
** 1 bug in JDT, 1 bug in Debug and 1 in Platform/UI on Linux being investigated ("Show In" no longer working)
+
** McQ: Is this transparent to most consumers, or will 5% have to react in their code ?
−
** Rest of the team working on docs
+
*** Lars has a few customers hit by this, but had to do a few tricks to mitigate the issue;
−
** Alex: On Ubuntu, might want to disable UBUNTU_MENUPROXY ... this is causing a lot of issues
+
*** Making the change won't break them, but they could now remove their workaround
−
* John: '''Went over the N&N''' ... number of things went in after M7 :)
+
*** Martin: Not a formal API change and feels like cleanup/polish - M7 as the "performance milestone" feels just right for this
−
** Dark Theme - Good story in place combining the old 3.x Presentation API with the new E4 (CSS) technology in a good way
+
** Dani: Can be convinced making the change now if it is widely announced; convinced that this will hit more people than helping
 +
** '''DECISION''' to allow making the change and announce widely.
  
 +
* Dani: '''FEEP and EMO Hiring Update'''
 +
** EMO working on website update to announce the work being done
 +
** Didn't talk about the specific SWT issue around "FEEP should provide clean stuff rather than quick fix"
 +
** Already agreed on hiring a person, communication will come in June/July
  
−
<hr/>
+
* Dani: '''IDE-dev proposal'''
−
'''May 28, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin
+
** People don't find our tips and tricks; suggestion to add to the welcome page
−
* Dani: '''EOL'ing the Delta Pack''' - announce now, remove during Mars - it's been obsoleted by p2 functionality
+
** Solstice L&F issue on old Browser
−
** Alex: Some of the test suite relied on the delta pack, it caused issues, OK with removing (PDE tests would need to be cleaned up)
+
*** McQ: Eclipse is a developer tool, and developers run on current browsers ... OK if only old browsers are affected
−
* Dani: '''Copyright Updates''' - tool is very slow since not ported from CVS properly, can run for hours
+
*** OK if there is a way out (such as choosing a different Theme) - not blocking anyone.
−
** John: Worth doing periodically but probably won't matter legally since copyright lasts for 7 years
+
−
** The change is not without risk (Dani: Could schedule after the release)
+
−
** McQ: Should consider updating the tool as part of that work
+
−
** Alex: Has a new intern, could use this as an opportunity to join
+
−
* Dani: '''RC3 status''' - last planned build - looking good, except for Platform UI, where the list of bugs is still long
+
−
* McQ: Discussions about a new Eclipse.org Web-based Toplevel Project
+
−
 
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''May 14, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, John, Martin
+
'''April 5, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin, Lars
−
* Alex: SWT GTK3 and the Endgame Rules
+
* Dani: '''FEEP Update'''
−
* Dani: Luna Plan Update
+
** Foundation pays Patrik Suzzi as a contractor to look at Platform bugs (triage, and fix)
−
* John: New Dashboard created by the EMO
+
** Will focus on critical / blocker bugs initially, or bugs already tagged by committers for 4.6 M7 and 4.6
 +
** Mickael Barbero still quite involved in Releng - Foundation looking for Releng replacement so Mickael can develop (already reviewed autosave - but might be on vacation at the moment)
 +
* Dani: '''Solaris 32-bit'''
 +
** Will provide Solaris 64-bit binaries, but stop building Solaris 32-bit with Neon
 +
** Open question: what does this mean in terms of GTK versions ? (GTK3 would be nice)
 +
*** Alex may start asking questions as soon as the binary fragments are in the repo
 +
** McQ: Windows 32-bit is still active - future change probably tied to
 +
* Dani: '''New Solstice Welcome'''
 +
** Some issues with Logo, sometimes it's there sometimes not; Brian working on it, Solstice will become the new default in M7
 +
** Currently, ONE product logo must work on all Themes - bad design - probably to be changed
 +
** McQ: Do we mirror the welcome for BIDI ? (Dani thinks yes, saw bugs come along)
 +
* Alex: '''FEEP Process Discussion (around Themed Scrollbars)'''
 +
** "Scrollbar Theming": Contractor doing work without SWT committers knowing, and disregarding suggestions from the committers
 +
*** Looks like the proper fix from committers was not even tried ?
 +
*** It's OK putting adding a layer if it solves a problem ... but if the proper solution is suggested, it should at least be tried.
 +
*** McQ: Accessibility - with 10000 items it's getting slow - should try the native way
 +
** Lars: Transparency? - No insight on what FEEP's are actually ongoing
 +
*** '''AI Dani''' send note to Wayne and Mike asking for location of FEEP Project List
 +
*** '''AI Martin''' compare against AC's requested list, and put on agenda for the next AC call
 +
** Lars: Styling is actually an important business driver!
 +
** Alex: FEEP feels like "quick and dirty" is favored at the moment over sustainable solutions !
 +
*** McQ: Perhaps a problem with the funding model ?
 +
*** Dani: Lack of people who want to fix issues on the list of the AC ?
 +
*** McQ: FEEP is still early - time to provide feedback now. Goal '''Transparency''' on what's done, and why design decisions are taken.
 +
*** McQ: Who cares for StyledText - have Markus have a conversation with the submitter ?
 +
**** Lars: We have no API for styling scrollbars (background, foreground) - Alex: '''THIS''' is what the FEEP should have adressed !
 +
** Martin: Next step should be conversation with EMO about toplevel transparency, and basic guidelines ("sustainable solution over quick fix").
 +
** Alex: Need something like JEP (Java Enhancement Process) for FEEP.
 +
*** McQ: Agree this is what we want, but would it discourage submitters ? The lighter-weight the process the better...
 +
** Alex: If anyone stepped in and did that work it's fine ... but such work sponsored via FEEP seems putting resources in a wrong direction.
 +
* Lars '''Question: Google work on improved Type Hierarchy'''
 +
** Main work is a new Index, Type hierarchy will be the first client, planned past Neon (contributor: Stefan Xenos).
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''May 7, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, Alex, John, Martin
+
'''March 29, 2016''' - McQ, Lars, Martin, Dani, Alex
−
* Martin {{bug|241957}} - GTK clipboard hang
+
* Lars: '''PDE Build in Maintenance''' - Officially state this ?
−
** Alex: GTK guys recommended using the async API, but no time for more investigation
+
** PDE Build still works; and we're not yet in a position to replace it (it's needed for manual export)
−
** McQ: Switching a sync API to async implementation underneath can be extremely messy (need to be aware of all possible events and event sources...)
+
** Alex: What about not quite declaring maintenance mode, but state something like "for a new project, you might consider Tycho or something else"
−
** McQ: If there is an idea canceling the clipboard wait ... given that the issue occurs only rarely, even a hacky solution is better than nothing
+
** McQ: '''DECISION''' Ensure that on the PDE Build Homepage, we clarify the relationship between PDE Build and other technologies (like Tycho)
−
* Dani: will do a plan update, hopefully this week
+
* Lars: '''Integrate more projects into Platform UI?'''
 +
** Having few commits on a component, or overlapping committer list, is not an argument for merging projects
 +
** Arguments for merging would only be if existing committers struggle with handling incoming contributions (or if component leads want to get merged) ... but that's not quite the case right now. Being able to look at a component by itself has also some value.
 +
** Alex: Being able to handle Team/UI would make sense for Platform/UI ... but not for the native resources
 +
** '''DECISION''' to not merge projects at this time.
 +
* Lars: '''Request for API Changes on eclipse-pmc mailing list'''
 +
** McQ: OK for a single PMC member to +1 the obvious ones, but should do due diligence on API changes (eg ping consumers etc)
 +
** Alex: OK for API Additions, but should discuss API changes
 +
** Compromise: API change requests must be requested on eclipse-pmc mailing list; PMC members must "speak up" on the mailing list if they want an item discussed, otherwise any PMC member can just approve. '''AI Dani''' notify mailing list.
 +
* Dani: 900 Bugs targeted Neon
 +
** Need to move away from "just moving bugs from one milestone to the next"
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''April 30, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, McQ
+
'''March 22, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin
−
* McQ: '''WB4 perspective customization''' - has it caused any issues ?
+
* Dani: we shipped M6 on time. Watch out for API change requests on the PMC mailing list.
−
** Martin: Dealing with detached views works differently (dragging a window fails - must drag the tab inside the window)
+
* Dani: public holiday on Friday (Good Friday) and/or Monday (Easter Monday)
−
** Dani: Saved perspectives / windows are lost on an existing workspace when moving from 3.x to 4.x
+
* Alex: gave an update on tests running on CentOS with GTK+ 3
−
*** Martin/McQ: When crossing the major version boundary, it is OK to lose state - it's not nice but acceptable
+
* Discussion about Che
−
** Dani: The bigger problem is, that the whole "Perspective customization" dialog is still not working as expected
+
** McQ: Che still feels monolithic - unfortunate that the Eclipse Resource Model was not considered
−
*** Martin: Agree with the concern, but the Perspective customization dialog wasn't ever great
+
** Dani: Preferences in Che vs. the IDE
−
*** McQ: If invest work here, rather make it good than bring back the previous status quo
+
** McQ: What would it take to unify Che, Orion and the Eclipse IDE ?
−
*** Martin: Most customization done via plugin.xml / Java , don't expect end users to do a lot of customization themselves
+
−
* Dani: '''M7 status'''
+
−
** Defect triage under control - some items deferred to 4.5
+
−
 
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''April 23, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, John, Alex, Martin
+
'''March 15, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin
−
* Alex - GTK2 or GTK3 as default - GTK3 it is
+
* Dani: '''Platform/UI got awarded as the Most Open Project :)'''
−
** GTK2 - more stable on old systems but no usable browser due to
+
* Dani: Mention PDE/Build as in maintenance? - discuss next week when Lars is back
−
*** xulrunner - latest version not supported by swt and latest distros don't even ship standalone xulrunner
+
* McQ: Merge Subproject Committers Groups? - Membership based on expertise is important
−
*** webkitgtk - gtk2 version in maintenance mode, upstream consider dropping, really crashy See [https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/2014-March/001821.html]
+
* Dani: Test Failures due to hidpi work - not entirely done yet but looking good for M7
−
** GTK3 still has some drawing issues (fighting them one by one, but functionally everything is there)
+
* Dani: Lots of failures due to "Widget Disposed" failures
−
** McQ: If neither state is really good, need to choose the option that's moving forward (switch to GTK3)
+
** Gerrit tests didn't fail, probably sine the event timing on VNC is a little bit different than running manually
−
* Dani - '''Freeze Plan created'''
+
** Alex: VNC/Gerrit tests run on GTK2 whereas all the rest defaults to GTK3 now
−
* John - '''Hackathon in London proposed by Ian Skerret'''
+
** Looking for a machine with GTK3 to enable them -- working with Mikael Barbero to get this for David
−
*  
+
* VS Code Open Sourced - plugin model is very similar to Orion
 +
** Excellent with TypeScript, not quite as good as Orion for JavaScript
 +
** Ideally, would love to see some unification of web-based IDEs (like Che already using Orion editor)
  
−
<hr/>
+
'''March 8, 2016''' - No call
−
'''April 16, 2014''' - Dani, Alex
+
−
* no topics today
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''April 9, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, Alex
+
'''March 1, 2016''' - Dani, Martin
−
* Dani - '''Kepler SR2 and Java 8'''
+
* Dani OOO next week
−
** Planning Council: Can build and host the patches, but messaging must be clear as "SR2 with the patches applied". Still polishing words of the download pages.
+
* Alex: '''{{bug|179924}} SSH-agent authentication''' 3rd party code for SSH using JVM internals
−
** Not added to aggregate repo ... one-time package without any updates
+
** Dani: Suggest asking on the bug for confirmation what's the JNA team's plan ... they have a full year time
−
** Feature patch available on Marketplace (for manual update) - for those starting from scratch they can now get "Kepler + Patch"
+
** Martin: JNA seems quite widely used these days...
−
** Not convinced that the extra downloads were necessary (early adopters already had the patch, new adopters can also get Luna) ... but current approach won't hurt.
+
* EclipseCon next week - Dani and Alex out - Martin will open the Bridge but might be canceled.
−
 
+
−
* John - '''Hard to review all incoming Platform/UI Contributions'''
+
−
** Dani tried to jump in on some issues like Icons
+
−
** Doubt that some of the work will really help bringing committers on board (such as the for loop conversion)
+
−
** Some of the initial contributors of very simple things have now grown into contributing real interesting things
+
−
** Getting more people involved in initial reviews (currently some 10 active committers, 4-5 fullday ones) - but mainly Eric and Paul review patches
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
 
+
'''February 23, 2016''' - McQ, Martin, Dani, Alex
−
'''April 2, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, John, Martin
+
* Dani: '''Mars.2 is on track'''
−
* Dani - new GTK3+ issues
+
* Dani: '''FEEP Update'''
−
** crash/hang when SWT AWT bridge is used, also affects JavaFX ({{bug|431330}})
+
** EMO still looking for people bidding on items prioritized by the AC - Pascal to look at some p2ish issues in April
−
** problems with main menu ({{bug|419830}})
+
* Dani: '''Update on Welcome'''
−
* Dani - '''Submitting the IP Log for the Java 8 Work'''
+
** Brian de Alwis contributed Solstice based Welcome - looking nice and done right, just a 4th theme to select (some artwork needs IP review)
−
** Currently not qualified as a "release", only submitting the IP log.
+
* McQ: '''Scrollbars on Windows''' and their appearance
−
* Dani - need to '''approve API changes for Java 8 in M7'''
+
** Dark Theme Scrollbars don't currently look good on Windows - proposal to paint in SWT - currently proposed on StyledText only
−
** No API changes, only additions
+
** Dani agrees with Alex that this would open the door to hell
−
** Used / tested by JDT Core / JDT UI
+
** McQ: Having seen AWT take ages in terms of emulating OS appearance makes the idea of painting ourselves not too appealing
−
** ObjectTeams (Stephan Herrmann) was involved
+
** Also concerned about special cases (like performance with ultra-long lines etc)
−
** There were no objections i.e. changes were approved
+
** Alex: Any approach in this direction will have bad effects in terms of SWT maintainability and its cross-platform support (think Wayland, RAP, ...). API additions designed with not at least 2 out of the 3 WSs supported are probably not good cross platform APIs considering how different the WSs are.
−
* John - '''SWT over JavaFX'''
+
** Could a GTK version on Windows perhaps be an alternative? Alex(after meeting additions): GTK is supposed to run fine there and Broadway on Windows can be driving for it as figuring the build on Windows should give working SWT (thanks to Wayland work making GTK port quite crossplatform).
−
** EclipseCon: Steve Northover thought it was possible, just a lot of work
+
−
** Decide after Luna whether hosting in SWT or doing as a separate project
+
−
** Relationship to Tom Schindl's [http://www.eclipse.org/efxclipse/index.html e(fx)clipse project] ?
+
−
*** e(fx)clipse is more about tooling, not so much about rendering ...
+
−
*** Tom seems to have an alpha version, but not actively working on it
+
−
*** Seem to need some additional API in SWT - patch sits in Gerrit with nobody putting any attention at the moment. Details in {{bug|426243}}
+
−
*** Having this API in place would make the JavaFX port simpler
+
−
**** It look good but Alex has no idea whether it's the best idea and how acceptable on all platforms
+
−
**** John: May make sense in the next release, API can't be a near-term thing ... needs some backers who can invest significant time in it
+
−
*** Doug Schaefer is also pushing for JavaFX
+
−
 
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''March 26, 2014''' - John, Dani, Martin, Alex
 
−
* John - '''EclipseCon Update'''
 
−
** Slightly smaller than in the past, but VERY of positive attitude, LOT of excitement around Java 8 ... Oracle turned on the servers during one of the morning sessions
 
−
** IoT / M2M - lots of demos on Raspberry Pi, many new projects
 
−
** Very good content around Orion and Javascript, but a small crowd
 
−
** Great opening keynote from Mike Milinkovich on the history and future of Eclipse - mentioned Flux
 
−
** See also Blog Posts from [http://cdtdoug.ca/ Doug Schaefer] and [http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/author/irbull/ Ian Bull] as well as [https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/news/top-5-ian-bull top 5 from Ian]
 
−
* John - '''ARM port of GTK''' - any tracking items ?
 
−
** Bug exists for Launchers on ARM64 ; several other items too
 
−
** IBM PPC Little Endian port of SWT
 
−
** Test on less used architectures like Solaris? - similar to the Windows 8 case...
 
−
** Donating RHEL subscriptions to the Foundation was not accepted - John: Bug is open for having Hudson slaves run on other architectures
 
−
*** Example: {{bug|430698}}, {{bug|429237}}, {{bug|415757}}; {{bug|419855}} talks about running virtualbox images on a vserver
 
−
*** Denis is investigating some way running Hudson / HIPP instances on other hardware ... GTK3, Windows etc tests need other hardware
 
−
*** Check for cost of hardware, companies to donate it, and people to maintain it (Security patches!)
 
−
**** Alex could imagine RH signing up for some maintenance ... test machines could be entirely outside Eclipse.org infrastructure, isolated as their own sandbox
 
−
**** Hudson needs access though, thus need to be careful about security
 
−
* Alex - '''Java 8 vs Java 7''' currently can't build an Eclipse SDK when the build machine has only one of the JDK's
 
−
** In the past, it was possible to build with only Java 7 ... now, if I have Java 8 I cannot build (need Java 7 too)
 
−
** ==> Update on March 27 by Dani: this is {{bug|390889}} and we'll try to fix it for M7.
 
  
−
<hr/>
+
'''February 16, 2016''' - Alex, Dani, Martin
−
'''March 19, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ
+
* no topics
−
* McQ - '''Congrats on Java 8 Release''' to coincide with the Oracle release
+
−
* Dani - '''Windows 8 Support''' - any answer to John's E-Mail ?
+
−
** McQ struggles with calling it a supported platform when nobody tests it; all we need to make sure is that somebody uses it
+
−
** Send note to Wayne, the epp-dev list and cross-project
+
−
** Make it clear that running on Win8 is a useful contribution ... and we WON't put Win8 on supported platforms list if we don't get that confirmation
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''March 12, 2014''' - Alex, Martin, McQ, John
 
−
* GTK - SWT team discussions
 
−
* John - '''preparing for Java 8 release'''
 
  
−
<hr/>
+
'''February 9, 2016''' - Alex, McQ, Dani
−
'''March 5, 2014''' - John, Dani, Martin, Alex
+
* Dani: looking good for Mars.2 (4.5.2) - no RC4 planned
−
* Dani: '''How to Avoid Spam in Gerrit''' - Bug in Bugzilla PMC bucket - consider offline
+
* Dani: please take a look at {{bug|466370}} Welcome Screen redesign
−
* Dani: '''Windows 8 Support'''
+
* Dani: please take a look at {{bug|472614}} Smart Project Importer
−
** Not listed in official plan
+
−
** No technical problem, but lack of resources - only 1 machine on the IBM team and that's a VM
+
−
** Add as supported Platform for Luna, or wait another year ?
+
−
** Most active development is on Linux and Windows 7 these days... agree with Dani that only active developer use helps finding real issues
+
−
** AI John: Send a note to eclipse-dev
+
−
*** Reaching out to Community to find an active user would be sufficient ... WPF or Win32 ? WPF is only a runtime target environment as of today.
+
−
* Dani: '''State of GTK 3+'''
+
−
** Not yet fixed on Eclipse side, but GTK found a bug on their side that is going to be fixed; not yet sure though if that will fix everything
+
−
** Launcher now has a fallback to GTK2 if it detects the partially supported GTK3 version
+
−
** Good collaboration after an initial warm-up phase ... Eclipse SWT considered an important-enough client to make fixes for
+
−
** Alex: Concerned about users with a GTK 3.8 distro that update to GTK 3.10 and get the fallback to GTK 2 activated which has crashes with autocomplete in the browser
+
−
** On GTK 3.9 or newer, Launcher falls back to GTK 2 but that port is pretty much unmaintained, several other problems in there ... but not falling back is even worse
+
−
** Should be fine once distros start picking up paint / clipping issue fix (the not-drawing fix is still pending on SWT side)
+
−
* Alex: '''GTK 3 in Mars'''
+
−
** Bump minimum required version to only use cairo and get rid of older calls - this causes confusion with GTK folk
+
−
** RHEL 5 would no longer work
+
−
** Thanks to SWT now requiring Java 1.5, can simplify the code wrt JNI
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''February 26, 2014''' - Alex, John, Martin, McQ
 
−
* John: '''Orion Release''' this week
 
−
 
−
* Alex: '''Eclipse on ARM64'''
 
−
** Launcher and swt at first
 
−
** Had ports for other architectures in source form in the past, risk to get stale but helps getting the ball rolling
 
−
** John: Quite a lot steps to make a new Platform real - constants in OSGi, ... - but can happen piecemeal eg only do SWT first
 
−
*** Martin: Would make sense to document the required steps for adding a new Platform while doing the job
 
−
*** At least, write up the TODO list - in order to make it easier the next time
 
−
** Should ask Tom Watson about OSGi constants
 
−
 
−
* Dani: Update on '''GTK 3+ issue''' - bug filed against GTK, working on a workaround for fallback but not yet finished
 
−
** Alex: Fix in GTK3 alone wouldn't work because SWT overrides GTK in that part
 
−
** McQ: If SWT API can't be implemented on top of new GTK API any more, discussion needs to happen
 
−
*** If SWT does something wrong, would need pointers to what they should be doing instead...
 
−
*** Maybe a couple phone calls to talk through the technical details
 
−
*** Don't fight over things ... figure out what's the right thing to do, and just do it
 
  
 +
'''February 2, 2016''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ
 +
* Dani: '''Foundation Hires''' - Dani hopes they'll find someone in Europe to deal with Releng issues
 +
* Dani: '''Neon M5''' went smoothly - M6 will be the API freeze; tomorrow is the last planned RC for Mars.2
 +
* Dani: '''CQ Deadline''' on Feb.12 for Neon
 +
* Dani: {{bug|486647}} for changing the strategy when opening files not associated with Eclipse
 +
** With M5, can now use the System Editor (default) or Text Editor - there's a request to always use the text editor
 +
** Dani thinks that for JPG one wants to use the OS
 +
*** Martin agrees, OpenWith and choosing an editor remembers the choice, and one can also remember;
 +
*** We also show the System Icon in Project Explorer, so using the System Editor by default is natural
 +
*** Alex set it to "ask via popup" - can be quite noisy, but avoids trouble when KDevelop or something associated itself with Makefiles or so
 +
** Agreement that flexibility is fine - see no case for changing the default
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''February 19, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, John
+
'''January 26, 2016''' - Dani, McQ, Alex, Martin, Lars
−
* Dani: '''Silenio to work on GTK issue?'''
+
* Official PMC representation on AC calls - keep McQ listed since he is interested but nominate Dani instead of John
−
* John: '''GTK testing at the Eclipse Foundation'''
+
* Next round of FEEP coming up - discussed pro and cons
−
* John: '''e4 ML discussion about graduating some tools'''
+
* Dani: busy week for the team: Mars.2 (4.5.2) RC2 and Neon (4.6) M5 due this Friday - on track
−
** Model Editor, CSS Editor, CSS Spy, ...
+
−
** Fairly late, but risk is rather low -- suggest putting into PDE
+
−
** Dani concerns: No PDE committers available for handholding - and stuff is not polished; even Lars sees it in Luna+1
+
−
** John: These tools would only be used by people building RCP apps
+
−
** Martin: What is the goal of trying to graduate?
+
−
*** If it's just about getting more exposure, perhaps keep in incubation and add to the RCP EPP Package ?
+
−
** Alex would like adding new people / interested contributors to PDE
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''February 5, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex
+
'''January 19, 2016''' - Dani, Alex, Martin
−
* Dani: '''Confcall Numbers:''' Skype into the US tollfree; Alex use SIP
+
* Upstaffing PMC - meet next week
−
* Martin: Eclipse 4 vs Eclipse 3.x - will file defects
+
* Update Eclipse PMC representation on the AC
−
* Alex: Testing on modern Linux
+
** Since only Alex will represent the Eclipse PMC at EclipseCon, should push for not making formal decisions unless there is remote attendance support
 +
* Dani: {{bug|485429}} '''PDE Build''' - looks like a lot of people still use it; OK if moving to a different component, but there's still a dependency:
 +
** Plugin or feature export still needs PDE Build -- Whoever wants to remove it, will need to implement a replacement '''in the Platform'''
 +
** Alex: Platform build currently does double bootstrapping Tycho already ... making this more complex would be a problem
 +
** Introducing other build system into the Platform would be a wrong approach
 +
** Will go ahead with what we have for 4.6
 +
* Alex: As of today's GTK3 build, Eclipse is working fine on Wayland :) thanks to a number of fixes in GTK
 +
** Some GTK developers are now considering Eclipse as part of their regression suite :)
 +
* SWT move to Java 7 was much appreciated; moving forward, how to deal with functional interfaces ?
 +
* Alex would be interested in some styling support in SWT - would simplify some things, at least on GTK
 +
** Could be a very simple API like setStyle(String) - win32 also seems to have some styling support
 +
* Martin: '''Stability of GTK3 on Mars.2 ?'''
 +
** Alex: Many distros do their own hacks, so hard to tell... Mars.2 should be stable on every distro that has a stable GTK3 distro without too many patches
 +
** Can't recommend GTK3 on Ubuntu yet; few things improved lately, but still causes troubles whenever Ubuntu updates their GTK, requires more fixes in SWT; Kubunutu and derivatives might be even worse
 +
*** Good news is that GTK3.16 dropped support for custom theming engines - causes some ugliness but at least it's stable
 +
** Debian or SuSE should be OK;
 +
** Expect Neon GTK3 to be more stable everywhere than GTK2
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''January 22, 2014''' - John, Dani, Alex, Martin
+
'''January 12, 2016''' - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin
−
* John, Alex: '''New GTK 3.10 breaking Eclipse on latest Fedora'''
+
* Dani: '''Upstaffing the PMC'''
−
** Alex been looking at Browser
+
** Considering "one-time invitation" to get to know candidates better; not so comfortable with a "trial period"
−
** Some Views not showing up - Silenio just back yesterday
+
* Dani: '''Remove Kim Moir from Platform Releng''' - ideally talk to Kim before moving forward
−
** Dani: For 4.4m5 and 4.3.2, will document issues in the README
+
* Dani: {{bug|485429}} '''Remove PDE Build from our drops?'''
−
*** Considered a fallback to "gtk2" support in the Launcher, but that was considered too risky
+
** Removing PDE Build is one thing - adding a different technology would be wrong, as wrong as adding EGit
−
*** Silenio might have a workaround ... OK if the new code can be added conditionally for GTK 3.10 only
+
** McQ and Dani will reach out inside IBM;
−
* Dani: '''M5 Status'''
+
** Patches are still being submitted; middle ground would be remove from the delivery but keep in repo (and deprecate since not adding features)
−
** Still many open bugs not triaged - component leads should triage earlier
+
* Dani: {{bug|485257}} '''Copyright Policy Change''' - waiting on EMO/Legal input
 +
* Alex: '''Updating SWT to Java7'''
 +
* McQ: '''Travel for EclipseCon'''
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''January 15, 2014''' - McQ, Andrew, Dani, Martin
+
'''January 5, 2016''' - McQ, Dani
−
* Dani: Lakshmi (SWT Team) going on maternity leave - SWT still a decent team of 4
+
* Dani: '''PMC Membership'''
−
* Andrew: PMC Participation - Suggestion
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
−
'''January 8, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, Andrew, John, McQ
 
−
* Dani: '''API Freeze''' with M6 on March 7, but JDT cannot put Java 8 stuff in before (March 18) thus will have to ask for an exception
 
  
 
= Archive =
 
= Archive =
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2015 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2015]]
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2014 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2014]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2013 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2013]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2013 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2013]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2012 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2012]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2012 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2012]]

Revision as of 12:22, 6 December 2016

Documents

Some documents written and/or used by the PMC:

Meeting Schedule

The Eclipse Project PMC has a weekly phone meeting every Tuesday at 11.00am EST.

Meeting Minutes

Dec 6, 2016 - Dani, Alex, Martin

  • McQ talked to Tom Watson about Equinox moving to Platform - Tom wants to discuss with the RT PMC
  • Alex: Update on Wayland
    • Fedora 25 shipping with Wayland by default
    • Wayland back-end for SWT is a patch in progress, some events not delivered, others incorrectly
    • Hoping to be in good shape by M5.
    • Until then, Gnome can be started on X11 with additional packages installed.
    • If Wayland is needed, the XWayland compatibility layer does work although slow (some drawing can be seen)
    • Some rewrite in the Launcher will be needed due to the security model - each window is isolated
  • Dani: How we test milestones - people putting in features sometimes don't seem to participate in the milestone week
    • McQ: Agrees that a good deal of manual testing is needed to cover flows that developers actually use
    • Alex: If milestone week overlaps with other duties (outside Platform) those other duties often take precedence
    • Test automation doesn't help for new features that add UI
    • Sergey distributes I-Builds so regressions are often found early - but there's no firm data on quality. Alex also distributes / uses I-Builds.
    • McQ thinks that some confidence in quality is needed, before I-builds are given out
    • Dani: Dogfooding helps a lot more than test plans.
    • To be discussed next week when there are more people on the call
  • 4.6.2 looking good; M4 test pass today for releasing on Friday
  • Oxygen plan hasn't seen comments, so will only put Java 9 updates in there

Nov 29, 2016 - Dani, McQ, Sergey, Alex, Lars, Martin

  • Sergey: Understaffed Projects Announcement - should it be sent to a wider audience?
    • Was sent to eclipse-dev with cc: eclipse-pmc
    • Dani suggest checking the mailing list archives or via RSS eg eclipse-dev mailing list home
    • AI Dani: send Sergey some links
  • Martin: Is it clear enough what contributors could do if they feel not being heard?
    • There is a forum and developer mailing lists, so for the Eclipse project we are probably good
    • Dani: The README.txt on top of the repo looks like a very good place for such kind of information
    • AI Martin review a couple READMEs and then make suggestions on the eclipse-pmc mailing list
  • Dani: RC4 - no build currently planned will push RC3. There's also Oxygen M4 next week.
    • Need to move out some planned bugzilla's targeted M4 (platform.ui: Lars to help, core: Sergey)
    • JDT UI is tight since Noopur is on vacation and Markus is very busy with Java 9 and HiDPI work
  • New process in place for the IP Log, IP log for Neon Update 2 (4.6.2) got approved today; Review is scheduled and ends on Dec.21
  • JDT Language Server: Still some blockers on the IP Work (hackathon contributions)
  • AI All Plan Update for Oxygen M4 bug 499768; Dani will update the Java 9 info
  • Lars: Approvals for Equinox
    • RT PMC don't have meetings or a process in place for approvals
    • They think that the Eclipse PMC is in a better position to approve Equinox
    • But why is Equinox on the RT PMC after all, does that still make sense? After all builds are done by Eclipse.
    • AI Dani discuss with Tom

Nov 22, 2016 - Dani, Martin, Sergey, Alex, McQ (Regrets: Lars - travelling)

  • McQ: Simplify adding committers to understaffed projects
    • AI Sergey final Polish on Lars' proposal + suggestions as discussed
  • Martin: bug 498116 download servers are hosed every Tuesday
    • PMC agrees to trying a fix for Neon.2 - this kind of issues is important (Android also ran into this kind of issue 2 years ago)
    • Dani: we can encourage them to fix it, but EPP and Equinox are not governed by our PMC
  • Dani: Neon.3 Planning
  • Dani: FEEP Discussions on the eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders mailing list
    • Voting will be more open this time
  • Dani: IP Log for Neon.2 - Endgame looking good, no planned fixes known at this time, but if there's a fix for bug 498116, we will consume it

Nov 15, 2016 - Dani, Sergey, Alex, Martin, Lars, McQ

  • Dani: Neon.2 Release Review went out, IP Log will come early Dec.
  • Dani: RC2 build tomorrow + test pass on Wed - last build before PMC approval is required
  • Dani: Bugzilla 4.6.3 milestone created - currently too many bugs targeted 4.6.2, suggest moving out except if there's a patch attached
  • Alex: Lucene - Using Lucene 6 for Platform.UI Indexing, prebuilt indexes of doc bundles need updating
    • Prebuilt indexes of older versions will not be used, the impact is just a slowdown on first startup of help
    • Old-version prebuilt indexes will trigger an entry in the errorlog, so projects will know
    • Q: How much should we push for having a single Lucene in the Release Train? (In Mars we had two)
      • Problem: Moving to Lucene 6 is real porting effort, and it is not possible to be backward compatible
      • EGit or XText, who want to support multiple Eclipse versions, may be allowed to bind against other Lucene by exception; but Planning Council message should be to favor the latest by default
    • Martin: Help Search Result Quality -- Was often critisized due to bad analyzers -- has it improved ?
      • Alex: Lucene 6 has apparently improved things, but team has not explicitly tested these cases
  • All: Understaffed Projects Discussion
    • Dani: Would like to send the message in a positive way: As a tool for interested parties to gain access to the code, and a tool for understaffed projects to bring in committers
    • Alex: Would like to send the message, that Eclipse is open to contributions
      • McQ: Yes, but not at the cost of making existing committers feel bad
      • Lars to draft a new note (next week)
  • Lars: Mylyn Notification API
    • Still on Dani's list of items

Nov 8, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Sergey, Lars, Dani, Alex

  • Dani: Update on N-Builds
    • Releng team will drop N-builds - will also reduce work on the Releng team
    • Retention policies will need to be updated on I-Builds (keep weekly I-Builds)
    • Provide a Hudson job which can mark an I-Build as unstable in case it isn't good
  • Dani: Neon.2
    • Feature Freeze today - Release Review just listing the N&N
    • There was some new API, but it was backported mostly for bug fixes ... nothing relevant for the N&N
    • Agreement that release reviews should be minimal effort - there was never community feedback on the reviews.
  • Lars: Code Reviews on Understaffed Projects
    • Make it easier for known, good people to get access to the code base for reviewing patches
    • We'd still need to know the people - don't offer commit rights to random people
    • Refactorings: Valuable if done by committers, but reviewing patches that are produced by refactorings is too hard
    • Making someone a committer is preferred if there is some commitment to doing work moving forward
    • Sergey: There's too many unreviewed patches against Platform in some areas - we need more committers.
    • Proposal: Offer a shortcut for committers on one component who express interest in another component.
      • Criteria: Provided contributions in the past, and shows interest moving forward.
      • Don't offer commit rights just for one contribution.
      • Consider merging components if a component has become so small that it's unnecessarily hard to contribute
        • On a case by case basis, only if we think that merging components would solve more problems than creating new ones.
    • Dani: Who makes the decision on shortcuts - existing committers, or PMC ?
      • In most cases, committers should have the say - but PMC may interfere if a project looks dysfunctional.
      • AI Alex will write up proposed statement

Nov 1, 2016 - McQ, Sergey, Lars, Dani, Alex

We agreed on the following changes:

  • Create maintenance branch immediately after RC1 instead of after the release. Use the maintenance branch to produce the upcoming release.
  • Eliminate all code freezes on the main branch for RC releases, except for 1-2 days after RC1 before the maintenance branch is created. Freezes to allow test for milestone builds will still be applied (milestone freezes).
  • We decided that we will only have ‘I’-like builds, using always signing.
  • We decided to revisit the decision to always ship from master, but that's a longer discussion and won't happen soon.

Oct 18, 2016 - McQ, Sergey, Martin, Dani, Alex

  • Dani: PMC Approval for Sergey co-lead on Resources (Done)
  • Alex: Lucene Update
    • Looking at updating to 6.x in Oxygen - CQs ongoing for Orbit - hoping to make M4
    • Others like Mylyn, Pydev, ... use Lucene 5.x at this time; others consume the Platform
    • There is some potential breaking things but should be fine since multiple Lucene's in parallel can work.
    • If an old pre-built help index can not be read, a new one is generated (Performance hit on the first run)
    • Dani: No issue, will also update Jetty in M4
  • Dani: Would like to open eclipse.jdt repository and corresponding sub-project to all JDT committers (currently only used for the JDT feature)
    • The project is almost dead with only 2 active committers, since new JDT leads were not voted in
    • Changes to feature will be rare, and Dani agrees to review
    • Allows to put the Oomph setup file into a shared place where all JDT committers have access
    • PROPOSAL AGREED by all.
  • EclipseCon Europe next week - Dani, Lars and Alex will be there - will cancel next week's meeting

Oct 11, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Lars, Alex, Sergey

  • Dani: Neon Update 2 Endgame Plan sent - thanks for the feedback
  • Sergey: We should talk about our release process.
    • McQ asked Sergey to start the discussion via e-mail
  • McQ: What do you think about Devoxx and Eclipse Converge

Oct 4, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Martin, Lars, Alex, Sergey

  • Dani: Neon Update 2 Endgame Plan - working on it
  • Dani: Release Review
    • In the past, features were not announced - now for 4.6.2, features + release review must be in by RC1
    • Will do the minimum necessary / required by EMO, for Update Releases.
  • Lars: p2 merge into Equinox status -
  • Sergey: Logistics of dealing with Service Releases
    • Managing version increments is very fragile and error-prone
      • Discussion already happened, see bug 499164 -- we'll not increment minor versions on backports even if API is added
      • AI Dani send a note out to eclipse-dev again
    • New & Noteworthy / Features for Update Releases:
      • If there's new features, there must be a New&Noteworthy for users (everyone agrees)
      • What about doing two feature releases per year with one service release each ?
        • Dani: Not having features in "some" releases would defeat what the Community wanted
        • Alex thinks that allowing features every 6 months would calm down most demand for new features
        • PMC Review of feature backports worked fine so far
        • RESOLUTION Will not change the process before having it settle a bit
          • McQ would love to see a single development stream all the time ...
      • Would the Generic Editor be acceptable in a release before June 2017 ?
        • Tentatively yes, it's a separate bundle not affecting other code, it matters to the Community, so why not...
        • Martin: OK, but what about newly introduced API ... would it be declared "provisional" initially ?
        • Dani: There's no such thing as "provisional API". Teams who decide on backporting must also decide on API.
        • Sergey: CDT has done full feature release every quarter for some time now and hasn't screwed up API...
        • Martin,Lars,Sergey: What about marking "fresh" API as "@noreference under construction" until it's hardened...
          • McQ: Then declare APIs as official only once a year ?
          • Wouldn't want to tie to a yearly cycle again ... but then we're back to the Version Numbering discussion...
          • AI All continue discussion on mailing list or next week.


Sep 27, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Lars, Alex + Sergey Prigogin (guest)

  • Discussion about PMC upstaffing

Sep 20, 2016 - Martin, McQ, Dani, Lars, Alex

  • Resources Leadership - AI Dani reach out to Szymon
  • PMC upstaffing: Focus on large installs; UI Freeze monitor, code cleanup, solid solutions, focus on code reviews
  • Dani: Java 9 Moved to July 2017 - AI Dani talk to the Planning Council, proposing an "Update 1" in July
    • Better for consumers, available via "just update", though little bit extra work (CQ + Release Review)
    • Schedule looks still aggressive when looking at specifications; need to keep the team motivated
  • Dani: SelectionListener SWT Change - reverted for M2 since more clients were affected than expected
    • Proposed change turned out to be source-incompatible - will look at a different approach

Sep 13, 2016 - Dani, McQ, Lars

  • Upstaffing the PMC
  • Build failures due to an SWT Change

Sep 6, 2016 - Dani, Lars, Alex, Martin

  • Dani: Thanks for approving Noopur
  • Dani: Java Language Server Proposal - at the Foundation, will be called "JDT Language Server"
  • Dani: RC4 - Fix for an Equinox p2 issue, only known issue being fixed, looking good
  • Dani: Looking at the generic code editor, would prefer moving some things to M3 (talking to Sopot and Mickael)
  • LTS: Market for paid fixes on old versions not quite as good as expected
  • Release Reviews: When is a feature considered an "important feature" ?
    • Important Features require a full release review thus lots of effort, avoided for Neon.1
    • AI Dani discuss in Planning Council call tomorrow

Aug 30, 2016 - No topics

Aug 23, 2016 - No topics

Aug 16, 2016 - Dani, Martin, Lars

  • Dani will not always be available next two weeks (Eclipse Summit India and IBM Bangalore team visit)
    • Please split the load on +1'ing backport/API requests - please do review the code and set the pmc+1 flag
  • Dani: bug 498106 Oxygen Plan
    • Agreed by all so far, including removal of REL6 as a reference platform
    • Individual subproject Wikis look pretty consistent now
    • UNIX Platforms (Solaris,AIX,HP-UX) have been removed for M1
      • PPC-Linux Releng was also removed but accidentally (due to a hardware failure), will be restored for M2.
    • No consensus on Ubuntu yet - will keep 14.04 in for now, consider taking out on the next update
  • Dani: bug 499164 Version Numbering for Neon.1
    • The original "+5" or "+10" proposal showed some issues:
    • Update with skipping would propagate to features; no tooling; no real benefit of semantic versioning
    • AGREEMENT to keeping using the status quo for now ("allow small updates even with micro uprev only")
  • Lars: p2 pending patches
    • AI Dani send E-Mail to Tom - suggest reviews or merger p2 back to Platform
  • Dani: bug 499399 Eclipse Infrastructure Stability
    • Denis is looking at it - maybe too many requests coming in ?
  • Lars: e4 spy and wizard migration to PDE
    • Dani: Are wizards e4 specific, or could they be used with JFace ?
    • New SWT Layout Spy should go to SWT, rather then keeping in PDE's Build
    • Some spies usable also in RCP Apps - for example the e4 model spy - 6 independent projects, dependency on emf.edit
      • Looks like a big extension to PDE -- consider some consolidation and cleanup (tests, String externalization, ...)
      • AI Lars to check if contributors would be willing to clean up as discussed, then moving into pde.ui would be fine.

Aug 09, 2016 - Dani

  • no one joined - had private conversation with McQ later
    • guys, please announce when you can't join. I can make better use of my time than waiting for you in the call ;-) - thanks.

Aug 02, 2016 - Dani, Martin, Alex

  • Dani: New Oxygen Plan Format
    • AI Dani ask Denis about aggregating the Sub Wiki's into the master page
  • Alex: SWT Fragments for ARM64 etc
    • Tycho doesn't support auto-selecting fragments - in contact with Jan and Tobias
    • Dani: Would like to revert changes - don't want to punish people who are not interested in fragments
    • Not really an SWT problem, so editing .target files would be a clean solution
    • Will probably go with empty (dummy) fragments without natives, as that's the simplest solution
  • Dani: SWT team - Lakshmi going to Sweden, will not be available until end 2016
    • Arun is mostly back, Sravan is now on Releng
    • Need to push further on building at the Foundation!!
    • Alex: Getting CentOS for building ... but test machines are on SLES11, which is too old, will need at least SLES12
      • Dani: Will need an owner at the Eclipse Foundation to ensure this proceeds ! Alex agreed to further drive this.
  • Target Env: Dropping REL6 -- reference platform for testing will only be REL7 (though will continue to run on REL6)
    • Reducing support level this year, in order to prepare for only supporting GTK3 next year

July 26, 2016 - no meeting

July 19, 2016 - no meeting

July 12, 2016 - McQ, Lars, Alex

  • Dani: Hackathon summary

July 5, 2016 - Lars, McQ, Alex, Dani, Martin

  • Lars: SWT move to Java 8
  • Alex: Initial builds of GTK 2.24 for AIX - planning to bump minimum GTK version to 2.24
    • Will remove non-cairo drawing, this is where most of the breakage happens
    • Ubuntu 12.04: 2.24.10 / 3.4.5
    • RHEL 6: 2.24.23-6
    • AIX, HP-UX, Solaris ? -- Oxygen will only focus on Linux, Windows, Mac
    • Secondary Platforms: Not built on EF Hardware, but interested parties can contribute binaries
    • Trying to support Platforms which can't move up to modern GTK at a similar pace as Linux is hard
    • AI Alex write up a message to the Community
  • Lars: bug 486961 extending the Eclipse Text Editor
  • Dani: Build, and Hackathon

June 28, 2016 - McQ, Martin, Alex

  • Discussion about Language Server Protocol
    • MS sponsoring hackathon in Zurich, Dani expected to go there
    • The protocol has an Open Source license, but there is no Open Source Governance ... who owns the specification?

June 21, 2016 -

June 14, 2016 - Dani, McQ, Martin, Lars

  • McQ: Mattermost / Slack for communication
    • not much different than newsgroup or IRC, but very dynamic when everybody is on it
  • Lars: Master is Open
    • Dani: Simple story - if we do need an emergency build we would create the maintenance branch on demand based on the tag
    • Only limitation: We can't update the parent pom's at this time
    • Don't have tools to check if the MANIFEST.MF needs to update - only API Tooling for API changes, but nothing for micro changes (bug 360703) is open to improve that)
    • We do have an alert if there's no version/source change but the binaries changed (e.g. due to a compiler update) but that's not in the workspace
  • Lars: Upgrade SWT to Java 8 for Oxygen ? - to be decided by the SWT team, the PMC is OK with the update if the SWT team decide so
  • McQ: Language API -- Overlap between Orion and Che (from ide-dev mailing list and bug 496114)
    • The protocol is pretty big, but well documented - looks like an improved version of Flux
    • The protocol is generic, implementations need to be specific -- some implementations already ongoing (Javascript)
      • People start working on editors hooking up to the protocol -- does it make sense building a JDT Language Server ?
    • The tricky part is, that the Che workspace model is very different than the Eclipse workspace
    • How to create a small lightweight server that would scale -- one workspace per user may not scale
      • At the beginning, it would be less powerful than JDT today since context would be lacking
      • But the direction is very interesting ... though maybe too many people are implementing the same thing right now
  • Dani: What goes into the Neon Update Releases
    • as discussed on May 17 (see below): Must be in master first, consider for backport after that
    • AI: Dani will prepare a note
  • Dani: Using Sound in Eclipse
    • Eric Rizzo uploaded a feature to provide different sounds for successful or failed JUnit tests (see bug 496003)
    • Martin: CDT has allowed sound for breakpoint actions since long
    • Lars: Moving the Mylyn notification framework to Platform UI was on the plan already, now considered for Oxygen
    • McQ: Every Platform has an OS-Level Notification system so that should really be leveraged
    • Martin: Mylyn notifications can be "active", can OS notifications also be active ? - McQ thinks yes
    • Could work on SWT implementation of host platform notifications in parallel to pushing down the Mylyn API
    • Request on specific JUnit sounds not yet decided.

June 7, 2016 - Dani, McQ, Alex

  • no topics

May 31, 2016 - Dani, Martin, Lars, McQ, Alex

  • Dani: IP Log
    • The tool did not work, but it was manually submitted and approved
    • In previous years, some people wanted the IP Log to not be so publicly visible, so now only project leads can generate and submit it
  • Dani: Release Review
    • Reply to the public E-Mail with comments or +1
  • Dani: Update Jetty to 3.9.3
    • Consensus to update - Jetty team working on fixing their update site
  • Dani: RC4 Status Update
    • Cooling down - maybe 2 fixes from SWT, 1 in Platform/Text Search, and the approved doc fix for deprecating the mac command

May 24, 2016 - Dani, Lars, Martin

  • Dani: IP Log Generator - New version is unable to deal with Eclipse Project, Wayne is working on it
  • Dani: Release Review - Deadline next week (June 2)
  • Dani: Deprecation Request from Brian
    • Command org.eclipse.ui.cocoa.fullscreenWindow -- all PMC agree on the deprecation although late, since it only affects docs
  • Dani: Copyright End Date
    • AGREEMENT to no longer require updating the end date (though committers are still ALLOWED to update it)
    • Will no longer run the automated copyright tool (actually haven't run it the past 3 releases)
    • Will live with the source code notices being inaccurate / incomplete - the accurate state is in Git
    • This is acknowledged to not be ideal, but the best compromise we can come up with since "bulk changes" are not OK
  • Dani: Neon Status
    • Java 9 launching - affects all Java consumers, not clear yet what Oracle will do, no plan changing Equinox/Launcher at this time

May 17, 2016 - Dani, Lars, Martin, Alex

  • Dani: bug 475184 Neon Plan Update 2
    • Windows 10 and Ubuntu 16.04 will be added as "active" Platforms that people do work on
    • SWT would like to remove Windows 8 and Ubuntu 12.04 from the list of reference Platforms
      • Alex: Ubuntu 12.04 has GTK 3.10 which is hard to support
        • Correction (Markus): Ubuntu 12.04 has GTK 3.4.2. Ubuntu 14.04 has GTK 3.10.8
      • Message is clear: "Supposed to run on older Platforms, but these are the primary ones" - including last 2 LTS ones
    • Agreement to keep Windows 7 and remove Windows 8
    • AI Dani to check if SuSE 11 is right (12 been out since 2 years)
  • Dani: Copyright End Date - EMO: To be decided per project
    • IBMers will have to continue updating the copyright end date, regardless of what other companies do
    • Copyright tool: Only the person who made a change is allowed to update the Copyright notice
      • gray area: actually fixing the date can be considered a change
    • Alex is in favor of consistency across the project
  • Dani: Policy for Neon.Update Releases - What to allow in, which rules to apply on the endgame
    • Martin: Fact is, that the Update stream is built less often, and thus also tested less often
    • Rule: Any fix or feature must be in master first (and may be backported thereafter)
    • Will want "some" features in Update, but probably not all of them - decision: discuss feature by feature at PMC
    • Stakeholder who's interested in a backport must send a quick note to the PMC (just like for API change requests)
    • In case too many requests should come in, could still discuss updating the procedure
  • Dani: Neon RC2 Builds Update
    • Currently looking good, but latest Java 9 Launchers broke the Annotation support - investigating
    • Quality generally looking good - "Stock GTK3" very stable now
    • GTK3 on SuSE, Fedora looking much better than Mars (at least with a GNOME shell)
    • Lars: bug 493477 detached editors broken on GTK2 nominating for RC

May 10, 2016 - Dani, Martin, Alex, McQ

  • Dani: Policy for what should go into Neon.Update Releases
    • Would like to be more flexible than in the past - discussion point for next week
  • Martin: RHEL7 -- GTK3 versus --launcher.GTK_Version 2
    • GTK2 rendering still much more reliable than GTK 3 - forced to release commercial software with the GTK2 fallback for now
      • Drawback: Even with MATE desktop using GTK2 (for accessibility), the Browser widget webkitgtk2 is not easy to get since not in the official repos
    • Alex: Desktops are moving faster - adopting change very quickly - cannot keep up with the investment that the Community currently makes in SWT
      • Heavily limiting what we support looks like the only viable approach at the moment...
      • There's 2 big groups of bugs: (a) "Next" version of GTK, and (b) "Old" version like Ubuntu 13.04 which has 3.10 - can we limit support to "latest" ?
      • Martin: Need "LTS" Linux (RHEL 7, RHEL 6, Ubuntu 12, 14 - soon 16).
    • Alex: Gnome people have come up with a "Container environment" for GTK - could ship Eclipse that way ?
      • Limitations: Updates must come through this application - already using Gimp from such an environment
      • Might be able to deliver Eclipse that way next year (Oxygen)

May 3, 2016 - Dani, Martin, Alex, McQ

  • Brian's request on the PMC list
    • McQ: Why would we care about adding small enhancements in RC1 when we should focus on testing and critical fixes
    • Dani: Two parts in the change - the original one (approvable), but another change also sneaked in (enable the prefix search) - not approvable
    • Alex: People don't want to wait for getting in an improvement...
    • McQ: OK for adding as feature to Neon.1 , but Neon.0 should be focused on bug fixes
    • Keep in Gerrit for now - Neon.1 stream is typically opened when no new changes are expected. Rebasing is relatively easy from Gerrit.
    • ACTION McQ to -1 and argue why.
  • Alex: Update on Accessibility
    • broken since GTK 3.8 where accessibility is no longer a module but shipped with GTK itself
    • due to that, the way accessibility is implemented is totally different - no more factories - experimenting with possible approaches
    • Discussing the addition of Eclipse to their test infrastructure, at a meeting a month from now
      • and even so, not sure how well accessibility is tested in GTK itself
    • Launching with -gtk_version 2 is not a workaround, because the v2 GTK doesn't register as an accessible application in newer desktops !

April 26, 2016 - Dani, Lars, Alex, Martin, McQ

  • Mickael's API change request ... tried to address feedback from Markus but then got no additional feedback
  • Alex: Accessibility - broken on recent GNOME and probably others
    • Accessibility is important. Have reports from users who say "Eclipse works for them"
    • McQ: Need to keep some focus and look at what we can do for Neon.1
  • Alex: Platform.ui generification of project
    • Dani: Won't get a consistent story when done piecemeal - needs to be done "per framework" and not necessarily "per plugin"
    • McQ: It's a huge effort - enough by itself for one whole release !
    • Dani: If a meaningful separate unit is found that can be done, but things like e.g. LabelProvider, ContentProvider and TreeViewer can't be done isolated
    • Lars: If a smaller unit of generification work is possible, that's permitted when somebody signs up for the work and it has been discussed in the public
    • ACTION Alex to prepare a message for review and then send that.
  • Lars: Copyright discussion
    • Not having the end date in the copyright notice makes the copyright invalid.
    • The IP Advisory Board will discuss it again.
  • Dani: Update on FEEP
    • Paul not reached out yet
    • A list now shows what's done or in progress - but no time
  • Dani: Update on M7
    • Last 4 builds failed due to infrastructure issues - Maven stuff could not be accessed
    • Will try to enable cache on the build side and re-try until the cache is full


April 19, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex (regrets: Lars)

  • Dani: IP Stuff on Copyright Updates pinged the Lawyers but no update yet, need to wait
  • Dani: FEEP discussed on AC, People were sympathetic to our issues.
    • General direction that FEEP sponsored work is no different than other contributions
    • Wayne took the Action Item setting up a meeting with Paul and interested parties.
    • Website with ongoing FEEP still pending - Dani is tracking
  • Dani: All PMC please review and +1 API requests when you find time
    • McQ does review and typically ask question but not close enough to the code to +1
    • AGREEMENT on "+0" votes to express "no objections but others should approve too
  • Reviews vs. Features
    • Alex: Badge System was quite successful at Fedora


April 12, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Martin, Lars, Alex

  • Lars: Get rid of the Copyright Year Update Requirement
    • bug 485257_c13 EMO: All information is in the git repos
    • McQ: OK lifting the requirement but doesn't want wrong information in files .. get rid of all copyright years ?
    • Dani: Replacing the end-date by "[see git]" might be an option
    • ACTION McQ or Dani talk to IBM Legal, then decide next week
  • Lars: bug 490012 Remove Project Settings to force strictly compatible JRE
    • Example: When don't have admin rights on a customer machine, can't install anything
    • Dani: With the Gerrit Build Validation, the risk of getting unbuildable code is no longer there
    • Proposal: Project requests a particular JRE, but the workspace configures treating this as an error or warning
    • DECISION to get rid of the strict error per project.
  • Dani: bug 475934 API Change on model processing order
    • Dani: Even if this fixes an issue, M7 is late in the game
    • McQ: Does API specify the order of events? - No; only on internal method.
    • McQ: Is this transparent to most consumers, or will 5% have to react in their code ?
      • Lars has a few customers hit by this, but had to do a few tricks to mitigate the issue;
      • Making the change won't break them, but they could now remove their workaround
      • Martin: Not a formal API change and feels like cleanup/polish - M7 as the "performance milestone" feels just right for this
    • Dani: Can be convinced making the change now if it is widely announced; convinced that this will hit more people than helping
    • DECISION to allow making the change and announce widely.
  • Dani: FEEP and EMO Hiring Update
    • EMO working on website update to announce the work being done
    • Didn't talk about the specific SWT issue around "FEEP should provide clean stuff rather than quick fix"
    • Already agreed on hiring a person, communication will come in June/July
  • Dani: IDE-dev proposal
    • People don't find our tips and tricks; suggestion to add to the welcome page
    • Solstice L&F issue on old Browser
      • McQ: Eclipse is a developer tool, and developers run on current browsers ... OK if only old browsers are affected
      • OK if there is a way out (such as choosing a different Theme) - not blocking anyone.

April 5, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin, Lars

  • Dani: FEEP Update
    • Foundation pays Patrik Suzzi as a contractor to look at Platform bugs (triage, and fix)
    • Will focus on critical / blocker bugs initially, or bugs already tagged by committers for 4.6 M7 and 4.6
    • Mickael Barbero still quite involved in Releng - Foundation looking for Releng replacement so Mickael can develop (already reviewed autosave - but might be on vacation at the moment)
  • Dani: Solaris 32-bit
    • Will provide Solaris 64-bit binaries, but stop building Solaris 32-bit with Neon
    • Open question: what does this mean in terms of GTK versions ? (GTK3 would be nice)
      • Alex may start asking questions as soon as the binary fragments are in the repo
    • McQ: Windows 32-bit is still active - future change probably tied to
  • Dani: New Solstice Welcome
    • Some issues with Logo, sometimes it's there sometimes not; Brian working on it, Solstice will become the new default in M7
    • Currently, ONE product logo must work on all Themes - bad design - probably to be changed
    • McQ: Do we mirror the welcome for BIDI ? (Dani thinks yes, saw bugs come along)
  • Alex: FEEP Process Discussion (around Themed Scrollbars)
    • "Scrollbar Theming": Contractor doing work without SWT committers knowing, and disregarding suggestions from the committers
      • Looks like the proper fix from committers was not even tried ?
      • It's OK putting adding a layer if it solves a problem ... but if the proper solution is suggested, it should at least be tried.
      • McQ: Accessibility - with 10000 items it's getting slow - should try the native way
    • Lars: Transparency? - No insight on what FEEP's are actually ongoing
      • AI Dani send note to Wayne and Mike asking for location of FEEP Project List
      • AI Martin compare against AC's requested list, and put on agenda for the next AC call
    • Lars: Styling is actually an important business driver!
    • Alex: FEEP feels like "quick and dirty" is favored at the moment over sustainable solutions !
      • McQ: Perhaps a problem with the funding model ?
      • Dani: Lack of people who want to fix issues on the list of the AC ?
      • McQ: FEEP is still early - time to provide feedback now. Goal Transparency on what's done, and why design decisions are taken.
      • McQ: Who cares for StyledText - have Markus have a conversation with the submitter ?
        • Lars: We have no API for styling scrollbars (background, foreground) - Alex: THIS is what the FEEP should have adressed !
    • Martin: Next step should be conversation with EMO about toplevel transparency, and basic guidelines ("sustainable solution over quick fix").
    • Alex: Need something like JEP (Java Enhancement Process) for FEEP.
      • McQ: Agree this is what we want, but would it discourage submitters ? The lighter-weight the process the better...
    • Alex: If anyone stepped in and did that work it's fine ... but such work sponsored via FEEP seems putting resources in a wrong direction.
  • Lars Question: Google work on improved Type Hierarchy
    • Main work is a new Index, Type hierarchy will be the first client, planned past Neon (contributor: Stefan Xenos).

March 29, 2016 - McQ, Lars, Martin, Dani, Alex

  • Lars: PDE Build in Maintenance - Officially state this ?
    • PDE Build still works; and we're not yet in a position to replace it (it's needed for manual export)
    • Alex: What about not quite declaring maintenance mode, but state something like "for a new project, you might consider Tycho or something else"
    • McQ: DECISION Ensure that on the PDE Build Homepage, we clarify the relationship between PDE Build and other technologies (like Tycho)
  • Lars: Integrate more projects into Platform UI?
    • Having few commits on a component, or overlapping committer list, is not an argument for merging projects
    • Arguments for merging would only be if existing committers struggle with handling incoming contributions (or if component leads want to get merged) ... but that's not quite the case right now. Being able to look at a component by itself has also some value.
    • Alex: Being able to handle Team/UI would make sense for Platform/UI ... but not for the native resources
    • DECISION to not merge projects at this time.
  • Lars: Request for API Changes on eclipse-pmc mailing list
    • McQ: OK for a single PMC member to +1 the obvious ones, but should do due diligence on API changes (eg ping consumers etc)
    • Alex: OK for API Additions, but should discuss API changes
    • Compromise: API change requests must be requested on eclipse-pmc mailing list; PMC members must "speak up" on the mailing list if they want an item discussed, otherwise any PMC member can just approve. AI Dani notify mailing list.
  • Dani: 900 Bugs targeted Neon
    • Need to move away from "just moving bugs from one milestone to the next"

March 22, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin

  • Dani: we shipped M6 on time. Watch out for API change requests on the PMC mailing list.
  • Dani: public holiday on Friday (Good Friday) and/or Monday (Easter Monday)
  • Alex: gave an update on tests running on CentOS with GTK+ 3
  • Discussion about Che
    • McQ: Che still feels monolithic - unfortunate that the Eclipse Resource Model was not considered
    • Dani: Preferences in Che vs. the IDE
    • McQ: What would it take to unify Che, Orion and the Eclipse IDE ?

March 15, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin

  • Dani: Platform/UI got awarded as the Most Open Project :)
  • Dani: Mention PDE/Build as in maintenance? - discuss next week when Lars is back
  • McQ: Merge Subproject Committers Groups? - Membership based on expertise is important
  • Dani: Test Failures due to hidpi work - not entirely done yet but looking good for M7
  • Dani: Lots of failures due to "Widget Disposed" failures
    • Gerrit tests didn't fail, probably sine the event timing on VNC is a little bit different than running manually
    • Alex: VNC/Gerrit tests run on GTK2 whereas all the rest defaults to GTK3 now
    • Looking for a machine with GTK3 to enable them -- working with Mikael Barbero to get this for David
  • VS Code Open Sourced - plugin model is very similar to Orion
    • Excellent with TypeScript, not quite as good as Orion for JavaScript
    • Ideally, would love to see some unification of web-based IDEs (like Che already using Orion editor)

March 8, 2016 - No call

March 1, 2016 - Dani, Martin

  • Dani OOO next week
  • Alex: bug 179924 SSH-agent authentication 3rd party code for SSH using JVM internals
    • Dani: Suggest asking on the bug for confirmation what's the JNA team's plan ... they have a full year time
    • Martin: JNA seems quite widely used these days...
  • EclipseCon next week - Dani and Alex out - Martin will open the Bridge but might be canceled.

February 23, 2016 - McQ, Martin, Dani, Alex

  • Dani: Mars.2 is on track
  • Dani: FEEP Update
    • EMO still looking for people bidding on items prioritized by the AC - Pascal to look at some p2ish issues in April
  • Dani: Update on Welcome
    • Brian de Alwis contributed Solstice based Welcome - looking nice and done right, just a 4th theme to select (some artwork needs IP review)
  • McQ: Scrollbars on Windows and their appearance
    • Dark Theme Scrollbars don't currently look good on Windows - proposal to paint in SWT - currently proposed on StyledText only
    • Dani agrees with Alex that this would open the door to hell
    • McQ: Having seen AWT take ages in terms of emulating OS appearance makes the idea of painting ourselves not too appealing
    • Also concerned about special cases (like performance with ultra-long lines etc)
    • Alex: Any approach in this direction will have bad effects in terms of SWT maintainability and its cross-platform support (think Wayland, RAP, ...). API additions designed with not at least 2 out of the 3 WSs supported are probably not good cross platform APIs considering how different the WSs are.
    • Could a GTK version on Windows perhaps be an alternative? Alex(after meeting additions): GTK is supposed to run fine there and Broadway on Windows can be driving for it as figuring the build on Windows should give working SWT (thanks to Wayland work making GTK port quite crossplatform).

February 16, 2016 - Alex, Dani, Martin

  • no topics

February 9, 2016 - Alex, McQ, Dani

  • Dani: looking good for Mars.2 (4.5.2) - no RC4 planned
  • Dani: please take a look at bug 466370 Welcome Screen redesign
  • Dani: please take a look at bug 472614 Smart Project Importer

February 2, 2016 - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ

  • Dani: Foundation Hires - Dani hopes they'll find someone in Europe to deal with Releng issues
  • Dani: Neon M5 went smoothly - M6 will be the API freeze; tomorrow is the last planned RC for Mars.2
  • Dani: CQ Deadline on Feb.12 for Neon
  • Dani: bug 486647 for changing the strategy when opening files not associated with Eclipse
    • With M5, can now use the System Editor (default) or Text Editor - there's a request to always use the text editor
    • Dani thinks that for JPG one wants to use the OS
      • Martin agrees, OpenWith and choosing an editor remembers the choice, and one can also remember;
      • We also show the System Icon in Project Explorer, so using the System Editor by default is natural
      • Alex set it to "ask via popup" - can be quite noisy, but avoids trouble when KDevelop or something associated itself with Makefiles or so
    • Agreement that flexibility is fine - see no case for changing the default

January 26, 2016 - Dani, McQ, Alex, Martin, Lars

  • Official PMC representation on AC calls - keep McQ listed since he is interested but nominate Dani instead of John
  • Next round of FEEP coming up - discussed pro and cons
  • Dani: busy week for the team: Mars.2 (4.5.2) RC2 and Neon (4.6) M5 due this Friday - on track

January 19, 2016 - Dani, Alex, Martin

  • Upstaffing PMC - meet next week
  • Update Eclipse PMC representation on the AC
    • Since only Alex will represent the Eclipse PMC at EclipseCon, should push for not making formal decisions unless there is remote attendance support
  • Dani: bug 485429 PDE Build - looks like a lot of people still use it; OK if moving to a different component, but there's still a dependency:
    • Plugin or feature export still needs PDE Build -- Whoever wants to remove it, will need to implement a replacement in the Platform
    • Alex: Platform build currently does double bootstrapping Tycho already ... making this more complex would be a problem
    • Introducing other build system into the Platform would be a wrong approach
    • Will go ahead with what we have for 4.6
  • Alex: As of today's GTK3 build, Eclipse is working fine on Wayland :) thanks to a number of fixes in GTK
    • Some GTK developers are now considering Eclipse as part of their regression suite :)
  • SWT move to Java 7 was much appreciated; moving forward, how to deal with functional interfaces ?
  • Alex would be interested in some styling support in SWT - would simplify some things, at least on GTK
    • Could be a very simple API like setStyle(String) - win32 also seems to have some styling support
  • Martin: Stability of GTK3 on Mars.2 ?
    • Alex: Many distros do their own hacks, so hard to tell... Mars.2 should be stable on every distro that has a stable GTK3 distro without too many patches
    • Can't recommend GTK3 on Ubuntu yet; few things improved lately, but still causes troubles whenever Ubuntu updates their GTK, requires more fixes in SWT; Kubunutu and derivatives might be even worse
      • Good news is that GTK3.16 dropped support for custom theming engines - causes some ugliness but at least it's stable
    • Debian or SuSE should be OK;
    • Expect Neon GTK3 to be more stable everywhere than GTK2

January 12, 2016 - McQ, Dani, Alex, Martin

  • Dani: Upstaffing the PMC
    • Considering "one-time invitation" to get to know candidates better; not so comfortable with a "trial period"
  • Dani: Remove Kim Moir from Platform Releng - ideally talk to Kim before moving forward
  • Dani: bug 485429 Remove PDE Build from our drops?
    • Removing PDE Build is one thing - adding a different technology would be wrong, as wrong as adding EGit
    • McQ and Dani will reach out inside IBM;
    • Patches are still being submitted; middle ground would be remove from the delivery but keep in repo (and deprecate since not adding features)
  • Dani: bug 485257 Copyright Policy Change - waiting on EMO/Legal input
  • Alex: Updating SWT to Java7
  • McQ: Travel for EclipseCon

January 5, 2016 - McQ, Dani

  • Dani: PMC Membership

Archive

Retrieved from "https://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=Eclipse/PMC&oldid=412570"

Back to the top