Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Eclipse/PMC"

m (Meeting Minutes)
(247 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
= Meeting Minutes =
 
= Meeting Minutes =
'''Oct 27, 2010:''' - Jeff, McQ, Dani, Martin, John
 
* Jeff: '''Security Issue with Jetty in IDE Help''' - returning JSP source code rather than content in some cases (very hard to reproduce)
 
* '''Build Times and Eclipse QoS for Builds''' - build times vary between 1 and 4 hours
 
** Mike M: Does the team have any idea for how to re-implement the build? - Stick with PDE Build + Hudson for now
 
** Jeff: Tycho/Maven might be viable if Sonatype showed up to help - Buckminster is more about orchestration than build
 
** Martin: What's the motivation for asking a change? - Long term support strategy...
 
  
 +
'''August 20, 2014''' - John, Alex, Dani
 +
* Dani: new platform PowerPC 64-bit LE {{bug|441358 }}
 +
** maintained by IBM
 +
** will be added to 4.4.1 as early access
 +
** Dani to send a note to cross-platform
 +
* Dani: individual made patches to support Solaris 64-bit {{bug|442266}}
 +
** we'd like to add it but don't have a machine to support it
 +
** important because our current 32-bit Solaris build will become obselete since there's no 32-bit JRE for Java 7 and beyond
 +
** Oracle should be interested since they provide both, Java and Solaris
 +
** Dani to ask Oracle
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Oct 20, 2010:''' - Jeff, McQ, Dani
 
* Eclipse foundation needs to help us get access to JSRs for Java 7
 
  
<hr/>
+
'''August 13, 2014''' - McQ, Alex, Dani
'''Oct 13, 2010:''' - John, Jeff, Martin, McQ, Dani
+
* Dani: Any feedback for the [https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/plans/eclipse_project_plan_4_5.xml Mars plan]?
* Martin: '''Hard to get a complete list of all applicable license texts''' - neither IP log helps here, nor mining all the about.html's (hard to find duplicates)
+
** McQ:
** Jeff: Wayne is writing a tool to validate IP logs - might be related
+
*** It does not cover Orion, but that is OK and like in previous release plans. Orion will most likely be moved to another top-level project soon.
** Jeff: Some work in p2 to collect / characterize license data, but only for feature license (umbrella thing). p2 metadata allows having multiple licenses, but that's not currently
+
*** We want to remove Mac OS X Universal 32-bit (all agreed)
** Conclusion: License info is not in a machine-readable form today. If this turns out being a problem for consumers, we may want to improve the situation.
+
* Dani: How to deal with requests to push our bundles to repo.eclipse.org {{bug|441530}}
* Martin: '''Obsolete 3rd party libs in the IP Log'''
+
** Dani: OK for me but we won't do the work
** When removing IP, add the "obsolete" keyword on ipzilla. How to deal with this while handling multiple Streams ?
+
** Alex: Maven needs the dependencies in the pom.xml. We don't want copy them from the manifest into the pom.xml and then maintain this. The pom should be updated when publishing the file into the Maven repo. Ideally by an automated task.
** Hard to associate any IP Log entry with actual license / code. Would be interesting to be able and link any Ipzilla against actual about.html online in viewcvs/viewsvn etc
+
** Conclusion: all agree with this, i.e. we won't do the actual work and we won't "pollute" our pom files.
** '''AI Martin''' open an IP Discussion for this
+
* John: '''Remove "early adopter" from the 4.1 builds'''
+
** McQ is in favor, no disagreement - '''AI John/Paul''' make the change
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Oct 6, 2010:''' - Dani, John, Jeff, Martin
+
'''August 6, 2014''' - McQ, Dani
* Feature ranges
+
* Dani: Will provide initial Mars plan next week
** Some projects using a buckminster capability to convert feature includes to wider ranges
+
** This makes it hard to reproduce builds and installs
+
** No longer able to install SR0 once SR1 is available
+
* Web pages
+
** Jeff working with Kim and DJ to improve appearance of download pages, introduce Nova theme
+
  
<hr/>
 
'''Sep 29, 2010:''' - Dani, John, Martin, Jeff
 
* John: UNIX groups - ongoing, now with Webmaster
 
* John: Parts of e4 project now moving to git - may pave the way for more git on Eclipse later on
 
** PDE Build Fetch factory for git currently exists as a patch on a bug, should live in egit - {{bug|289838}}
 
* Jeff: Download page - Cluttered and hard to navigate - {{bug|326444}} for Equinox: too many columns, too much text
 
** Make it easier to find "the latest"; update the look to be more consistent with main web pages
 
** Most people just get the SDK, or the SWT downloads
 
** '''AI''' File bug for discussion
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Sep 22, 2010:''' - Dani, Jeff, Martin, John
+
'''No meetings in July'''
* John: 3.7 -> 4.1 EPP upgrade - idea is to just upgrade the Platform (not a long-term, but interim idea)
+
** Goal is increasing the usage of 4.1, without further producing full EPP's
+
* Dani: How to move forward with UNIX group restructuring
+
** Wait for the build.e.o problems to get resolved, then John to follow up with Denis (via the discussion bug), once there is a concrete suggestion of what is desired in terms of ACL's
+
* John: M2a rebuild - anything we can do to reduce the chance of getting such bugs in the future?
+
** No-Reference analysis warnings were turned off in the past since there were too many false positives
+
** Dani - Bytecode are independent of warnings, there's really 2 issues:
+
*** (a) compiler only changed every 6 weeks, earlier compiler adoption would have found this earlier
+
*** (b) bytecode comparison after builds ?
+
*** John: using the new p2 every week turned out to be too volatile (but compiler may be more stable)
+
**** Goal of updating basebuilder more often would be adding "compile Eclipse" as a big testcase for the compiler
+
** '''AI John''' to discuss with Kim
+
  
<hr/>
 
'''Sep 15, 2010:''' - Dani, Jeff, McQ, John
 
* Moving up to ICU4J 4.6 which requires Java 5
 
** We are stuck on old version of ICU4J unless we can move to Java 5
 
** We previously agreed moving to Java 5 is ok - no complaints here
 
** Need to document the steps for someone running RCP on Foundation 1.1 - have to switch to older version of ICU4J
 
** This will enable us to consume future ICU4J versions that may be able to split large timezone data into a separately consumable piece.
 
* Unix groups
 
** Preference is to avoid multiple votes
 
** Try to use ACLs to enable multiple groups for some directories
 
** If this is too complex, then have two groups but not expose two votes. I.e., when a committer is approved, we need to tell webmasters to add "common" along with whatever component they are being added to.
 
* Release train and 3.7/4.1 split
 
** Planning council working out how to handle 3.7/4.1 split
 
** Some argued that having 4.1 EPP packages would greatly improve adoption
 
** Being able to "one click" upgrade from 3.7->4.1 EPP not too bad and greatly reduces dis/mirror footprint (for example a link in welcome page)
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
 
+
'''Jun 4, 2014''' - Dani, John, Martin, McQ, Alex
'''Sep 8, 2010:''' - John, Jeff, McQ
+
* Dani: '''RC4 Status''' looking good
* Discussed reception of 4.0 release.
+
** 1 bug in JDT, 1 bug in Debug and 1 in Platform/UI on Linux being investigated ("Show In" no longer working)
** We probably overdid the caution and it appears to be getting very little use
+
** Rest of the team working on docs
** Will encourage Eclipse project developers to use 4.1 builds to help find and iron out bugs
+
** Alex: On Ubuntu, might want to disable UBUNTU_MENUPROXY ... this is causing a lot of issues
* Discussed [[Eclipse/PMC/Unix Groups]] again
+
* John: '''Went over the N&N''' ... number of things went in after M7 :)
** Need to resolve with webmasters how to handle "common" things. Entered {{bug|324772}} to iron out details with web master
+
** Dark Theme - Good story in place combining the old 3.x Presentation API with the new E4 (CSS) technology in a good way
* John asked for input on draft Indigo plan
+
* Discussed how to better handle ECF contributions
+
** Either ECF needs to be done earlier, or we have to live with our dates slipping
+
** Need to work together to see if we can improve contribution process
+
** We need to at least make sure they are in the loop on our build and end-game schedules
+
* Jeff mentioned target platform management in PDE has a few holes. Will have a follow-up call to dive into details with PDE committers.
+
  
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
 +
'''Jun 11, 2014''' - Martin, McQ, Alex, John
 +
* John: Eclipse Theming: When switching the OS Theme to dark, Eclipse should be aware
 +
** Dark Theme is currently a tech preview
  
'''Sep 1, 2010:''' - John, Jeff, Dani
 
* Discussed [[Eclipse/PMC/Unix Groups]]
 
** Agreed with general direction about greatly reducing number of groups
 
** Dani proposed some changes to text and search components, which have since been incorporated into the doc
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
 +
'''Jun 4, 2014''' - Dani, John, Martin, McQ, Alex
 +
* Dani: '''RC4 Status''' looking good
 +
** 1 bug in JDT, 1 bug in Debug and 1 in Platform/UI on Linux being investigated ("Show In" no longer working)
 +
** Rest of the team working on docs
 +
** Alex: On Ubuntu, might want to disable UBUNTU_MENUPROXY ... this is causing a lot of issues
 +
* John: '''Went over the N&N''' ... number of things went in after M7 :)
 +
** Dark Theme - Good story in place combining the old 3.x Presentation API with the new E4 (CSS) technology in a good way
  
'''Aug 25, 2010:''' - Dani, Martin
 
* Dani - 3.6.1 looks ok - no other topics
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Aug 18, 2010:''' - Dani, John, Martin
+
'''May 28, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin
* John - '''Eclipse 3.x and 4.0''' and the Release Train
+
* Dani: '''EOL'ing the Delta Pack''' - announce now, remove during Mars - it's been obsoleted by p2 functionality
** Early feedback from 4.0 adopters is that most stuff actually works when dropping in binaries (talking binary compatibility, not source compatibility)
+
** Alex: Some of the test suite relied on the delta pack, it caused issues, OK with removing (PDE tests would need to be cleaned up)
** Martin is concerned that dropping binaries built against 3.x into 4.0 will fail late at runtime only, due to use of internals
+
* Dani: '''Copyright Updates''' - tool is very slow since not ported from CVS properly, can run for hours
** John suggests API usage scan to understand issues early
+
** John: Worth doing periodically but probably won't matter legally since copyright lasts for 7 years
** Martin is more interested in source compatibility (build against 4.0) - can this be made super simple?
+
** The change is not without risk (Dani: Could schedule after the release)
 +
** McQ: Should consider updating the tool as part of that work
 +
** Alex: Has a new intern, could use this as an opportunity to join
 +
* Dani: '''RC3 status''' - last planned build - looking good, except for Platform UI, where the list of bugs is still long
 +
* McQ: Discussions about a new Eclipse.org Web-based Toplevel Project
  
<hr/>
 
'''Aug 11, 2010:''' - McQ, Martin, Dani
 
* McQ - '''3.7 Planning Process''' - input requested from all committers about plan items
 
* '''Eclipse 4.0 Feedback''' - not too much seen, neither good nor bad
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Aug 4, 2010:''' - meeting cancelled
+
'''May 14, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, John, Martin
 +
* Alex: SWT GTK3 and the Endgame Rules
 +
* Dani: Luna Plan Update
 +
* John: New Dashboard created by the EMO
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jul 28, 2010:''' - McQ, John, Martin, Dani, Jeff
+
'''May 7, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, Alex, John, Martin
* Discussed process for handling security patches
+
* Martin {{bug|241957}} - GTK clipboard hang
** If patches had metadata that would allow them to be flagged as security or "critical" patches, then p2 could automatically apply them on startup
+
** Alex: GTK guys recommended using the async API, but no time for more investigation
** Deluxe solution would use out of process installer to be able to repair corrupt install that can't even start
+
** McQ: Switching a sync API to async implementation underneath can be extremely messy (need to be aware of all possible events and event sources...)
** Simple solution is to put patches in the eclipse/updates/3.6 repository and users need to apply them manually
+
** McQ: If there is an idea canceling the clipboard wait ... given that the issue occurs only rarely, even a hacky solution is better than nothing
* McQ gave a summary of the state of the Eclipse SDK 4.0 release (see his later [http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/mcqjustmcq/2010/07/28/growing-the-future/ blog post]).
+
* Dani: will do a plan update, hopefully this week
* Discussed possibility of facet work moving to e4
+
** Need to be clear on what would be required to migrate it to the platform
+
** Have separate call with Konstantin to discuss
+
* Discussed state of builds moving to Foundation infrastructure
+
** Could explore migrating build to different build technology such as Buckminster or Tycho if it provides any benefit
+
** Concern about the build/test machines becoming a bottleneck as more projects move to it
+
** Still need to run performance tests on IBM hardware for now because virtualized machine is not consistent enough
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jul 21, 2010:''' - McQ, John, Martin, Dani
+
'''April 30, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, McQ
* McQ - '''State of Eclipse 4.0'''
+
* McQ: '''WB4 perspective customization''' - has it caused any issues ?
** Not where we'd like us to be, but converging fast and there seem no issues blocking shipping
+
** Martin: Dealing with detached views works differently (dragging a window fails - must drag the tab inside the window)
** Not slowing down people any more, and get some new capabilities (view tear-off etc)
+
** Dani: Saved perspectives / windows are lost on an existing workspace when moving from 3.x to 4.x
** Should we have 3.7 and 4.1 release trains? allow projects to choose? - Discussions ongoing with PC, Foundation (enough resources to support this?)
+
*** Martin/McQ: When crossing the major version boundary, it is OK to lose state - it's not nice but acceptable
* John - '''Eclipse 4.0 Release Review'''
+
** Dani: The bigger problem is, that the whole "Perspective customization" dialog is still not working as expected
** Need to go public now to have 1-week review period
+
*** Martin: Agree with the concern, but the Perspective customization dialog wasn't ever great
* Dani - need to start publishing the '''3.6.1 freeze plan'''
+
*** McQ: If invest work here, rather make it good than bring back the previous status quo
* Dani - '''separate groups for resources and runtime'''
+
*** Martin: Most customization done via plugin.xml / Java , don't expect end users to do a lot of customization themselves
** Too small micro-components make operation harder
+
* Dani: '''M7 status'''
** McQ 0, Martin 0, Dani +1, John +1 (but strive for more simplicity on other areas)
+
** Defect triage under control - some items deferred to 4.5
* Vacations - McQ 2 weeks off starting Aug 16
+
  
<hr/>
 
'''Jul 14, 2010:''' - McQ, Martin, Dani
 
* Dani - '''Problem launching Oracle/Sun jre6u21 on Windows'''
 
** {{bug|319514}} Quickly runs out of Permgen space, because the vendor name has changed and so the -XXPermGen flag is not appended
 
** Put in a quick workaround for 3.6.1, patch ahead of time (some people wanted a 3.6a but we don't think that's worth the ripple)
 
** Most commercial products ship a VM, so likely not as bad as thought
 
*** Very natural that failure can happen when we don't control the VMs and the VM has custom arguments
 
** Only a windows issue for now (Linux parses version and looks for "hotspot")
 
** Martin: Placing a .hotspotrc file somewhere is another possible workaround
 
** Dani and Martin propose updating the FAQ, adding a Readme section, circulating the information about workarounds should be sufficient.
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jul 7, 2010:''' - McQ, Jeff, Martin, John, Dani
+
'''April 23, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, John, Alex, Martin
* McQ - '''Graduating e4 without changing the name'''
+
* Alex - GTK2 or GTK3 as default - GTK3 it is
** Jeff - a little effort upfront on messaging may pay off really big in the longer run ... picking up 4.0 without proper messaging may end up in lot negative press
+
** GTK2 - more stable on old systems but no usable browser due to
** eg messages about the state of Performance, BIDI, ... cf Eclipse 4.0 "Early Adopter Release"
+
*** xulrunner - latest version not supported by swt and latest distros don't even ship standalone xulrunner
* Dani - '''BREE to 1.5 for JDT-UI''', what is the process?
+
*** webkitgtk - gtk2 version in maintenance mode, upstream consider dropping, really crashy See [https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/2014-March/001821.html]
** '''approved''', all in favor, eat our own dogfood, 1.6 does not provide much benefit
+
** GTK3 still has some drawing issues (fighting them one by one, but functionally everything is there)
* Dani - '''Checkin Policies for 3.6.1 Maintenance Stream'''
+
** McQ: If neither state is really good, need to choose the option that's moving forward (switch to GTK3)
** We should have more control over what goes into M-builds .. what's the least intrusive way doing so?
+
* Dani - '''Freeze Plan created'''
** McQ suggests M7-ish policies + endgame . Dani suggests mandatory 1-committer code review. Martin requires fix verification.
+
* John - '''Hackathon in London proposed by Ian Skerret'''
** Bring up the topic on Arch call, since committers are affected .. the goal is keeping quality high and having change control.
+
*  
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jun 30, 2010:''' - McQ, Dani, John
+
'''April 16, 2014''' - Dani, Alex
* No negative response yet about switching to Java 6 reference platforms
+
* no topics today
** Components free to move up but not a free-for-all. Justify reasons for moving up on eclipse-pmc mailing list.
+
** In many cases there is little added benefit of Java 6 so Java 5 is more likely as a bundle execution environment
+
* 4.0 release and bundle/package naming
+
** Agreed that we will not migrate bundle/package namespaces at this time
+
** e4 API is not ready so the separation is helpful to divide it from the mature API
+
** It is not simply a package name issue, there are also class names containing "e4". Need to work through the process of merging the new API with the old, but this will take time
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jun 23, 2010:''' - Jeff, John
+
'''April 9, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, Alex
* No topics
+
* Dani - '''Kepler SR2 and Java 8'''
 +
** Planning Council: Can build and host the patches, but messaging must be clear as "SR2 with the patches applied". Still polishing words of the download pages.
 +
** Not added to aggregate repo ... one-time package without any updates
 +
** Feature patch available on Marketplace (for manual update) - for those starting from scratch they can now get "Kepler + Patch"
 +
** Not convinced that the extra downloads were necessary (early adopters already had the patch, new adopters can also get Luna) ... but current approach won't hurt.
  
<hr/>
+
* John - '''Hard to review all incoming Platform/UI Contributions'''
'''Jun 16, 2010:''' - McQ, Martin, Dani, Jeff
+
** Dani tried to jump in on some issues like Icons
* McQ - '''Java 4 going away''' (was EOL since October 2008, Java 5 EOL since October 2009)
+
** Doubt that some of the work will really help bringing committers on board (such as the for loop conversion)
** Dani: Don't bump up any BREBump up to 1.5 only if needed
+
** Some of the initial contributors of very simple things have now grown into contributing real interesting things
** Jeff: If moving off 1.4, why not move up to 1.6 ?
+
** Getting more people involved in initial reviews (currently some 10 active committers, 4-5 fullday ones) - but mainly Eric and Paul review patches
*** Reality is that we want the tiny Foundatation-1.1 or the big wad, and 1.5 is no better than 1.6
+
*** Equinox may start using Generics and down-compile to 1.4 ... think about what's in ercp
+
** Start a cross-project discussion... question is whether everyone who depends on Platform has 1.6 VM Support
+
** Martin has no problem with 1.6, suggest asking on cross-project / some of the bigger players (e.g. Jetty, Modeling, ...)
+
*** McQ to ask Boris bring up with the Board
+
* Martin, Jeff, Dani vacation next 2 weeks (likely not on the call).
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jun 9, 2010:''' - Martin, Dani, McQ, John
 
* Dani - '''Approval for Docs''' - flexibility around docs is good, but after RC4 is too late.
 
* Dani - '''Re-Opening HEAD''' - basically OK, to be discussed at the Arch call.
 
* McQ - '''Shutting down status messages''' for rest of the month except for really noteworthy things.
 
  
<hr/>
+
'''April 2, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, John, Martin
'''Jun 2, 2010:''' - Martin, Dani, McQ, John, McQ
+
* Dani - new GTK3+ issues
* Dani - '''ECF Issues''': Why does Eclipse have a process with Approvals while ECF does not. At the moment, there is a mutual dependency.
+
** crash/hang when SWT AWT bridge is used, also affects JavaFX ({{bug|431330}})
** Once we decided to consume them, we have no control over their rules.
+
** problems with main menu ({{bug|419830}})
** Our only option is not consuming late changes from them (and thus burn the community and them).
+
* Dani - '''Submitting the IP Log for the Java 8 Work'''
** John - there are some cases where we could push back a bit more (without going to the limit of not consuming at all).
+
** Currently not qualified as a "release", only submitting the IP log.
** Problems have been due to the build (and not due to quality issues in their code). But this doesn't change the fact that '''ANY''' late binding change is work and risk and should thus be pushed back if possible.
+
* Dani - need to '''approve API changes for Java 8 in M7'''
** McQ would like to be more flexible accepting changes .. are we becoming too stiff? ie. do what we can to mitigate risk, but live with taking risk .. that's part of the Eclipse Way.
+
** No API changes, only additions
* John - '''Builds after RC4'''
+
** Used / tested by JDT Core / JDT UI
** Need PMC agreement. John going to discuss cross-project criteria.
+
** ObjectTeams (Stephan Herrmann) was involved
** McQ doesn't want to tie our release to the winds of others (outside Eclipse) getting back to us or not. '''We should not be asking cross-project for approval.'''
+
** There were no objections i.e. changes were approved
** Each project is going to do what makes most sense to them (including us). In favor of having the conversation, but not asking for approval.
+
* John - '''SWT over JavaFX'''
* John - '''When to start 3.7 and 3.6.1 builds''' - defer to next week.
+
** EclipseCon: Steve Northover thought it was possible, just a lot of work
 +
** Decide after Luna whether hosting in SWT or doing as a separate project
 +
** Relationship to Tom Schindl's [http://www.eclipse.org/efxclipse/index.html e(fx)clipse project] ?
 +
*** e(fx)clipse is more about tooling, not so much about rendering ...
 +
*** Tom seems to have an alpha version, but not actively working on it
 +
*** Seem to need some additional API in SWT - patch sits in Gerrit with nobody putting any attention at the moment. Details in {{bug|426243}}
 +
*** Having this API in place would make the JavaFX port simpler
 +
**** It look good but Alex has no idea whether it's the best idea and how acceptable on all platforms
 +
**** John: May make sense in the next release, API can't be a near-term thing ... needs some backers who can invest significant time in it
 +
*** Doug Schaefer is also pushing for JavaFX
  
<hr/>
 
'''May 26, 2010:''' - Dani, McQ, Martin, Jeff, John
 
* Brief meeting. John just mentions that there's surprisingly many "Critical" bugs. Maybe just a triage problem. Will bring up in Arch call.
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''May 19, 2010:''' - Dani, McQ, Martin, Jeff, John
+
'''March 26, 2014''' - John, Dani, Martin, Alex
* John - {{bug|27930}} '''Naming of Eclipse Classic'''
+
* John - '''EclipseCon Update'''
** McQ - No other package on that page is the output of a single project, would want to see Eclipse SDK removed from packages page
+
** Slightly smaller than in the past, but VERY of positive attitude, LOT of excitement around Java 8 ... Oracle turned on the servers during one of the morning sessions
** Jeff - "RCP/Plugin Developer" used to be direct replacements (SDK + Mylyn + XML Editor), but now also includes RAP (217MB)
+
** IoT / M2M - lots of demos on Raspberry Pi, many new projects
** Dani - Some people go to downloads/ and then look for a milestone
+
** Very good content around Orion and Javascript, but a small crowd
** "Development Builds" tab provides access to milestones of packages; "Projects" tab provides access to direct project output.
+
** Great opening keynote from Mike Milinkovich on the history and future of Eclipse - mentioned Flux
** '''Resolution:''' 650.000 people have downloaded classic (#2 download), even scrolling down - changing this is a waste.
+
** See also Blog Posts from [http://cdtdoug.ca/ Doug Schaefer] and [http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/author/irbull/ Ian Bull] as well as [https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/news/top-5-ian-bull top 5 from Ian]
* Dani - {{bug|313524}} '''Preference for new API Constant''' for the Formatter (also [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=59891#c45 bug 59891 comment 45] and onwards)
+
* John - '''ARM port of GTK''' - any tracking items ?
** Some people don't like the new look (method wrapping) - currently no way to have the formatter behave the same in 3.5 and 3.6
+
** Bug exists for Launchers on ARM64 ; several other items too
** '''Resolution:''' pmc+ since little effort avoids lot of churn. Keeping the functionality without allowing to disable is a no-go.
+
** IBM PPC Little Endian port of SWT
* Martin - '''Feedback channel for removing API''' process (e.g. {{bug|311931}})
+
** Test on less used architectures like Solaris? - similar to the Windows 8 case...
** '''Resolution:''' Add a suggestion to the [[Eclipse/API Central/API Removal Process]] page to start fresh for the feedback channel if there's a lot of discussion on the existing bug (by bugzilla clone)
+
** Donating RHEL subscriptions to the Foundation was not accepted - John: Bug is open for having Hudson slaves run on other architectures
* John - '''4.0 topics'''
+
*** Example: {{bug|430698}}, {{bug|429237}}, {{bug|415757}}; {{bug|419855}} talks about running virtualbox images on a vserver
** FYI: Ian created a draft of a [http://www.eclipse.org/helios/eclipse-sdk-4.0/ landing page]. Working on a [http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/Eclipse_SDK_4.0_FAQ release FAQ] page
+
*** Denis is investigating some way running Hudson / HIPP instances on other hardware ... GTK3, Windows etc tests need other hardware
 +
*** Check for cost of hardware, companies to donate it, and people to maintain it (Security patches!)
 +
**** Alex could imagine RH signing up for some maintenance ... test machines could be entirely outside Eclipse.org infrastructure, isolated as their own sandbox
 +
**** Hudson needs access though, thus need to be careful about security
 +
* Alex - '''Java 8 vs Java 7''' currently can't build an Eclipse SDK when the build machine has only one of the JDK's
 +
** In the past, it was possible to build with only Java 7 ... now, if I have Java 8 I cannot build (need Java 7 too)
 +
** ==> Update on March 27 by Dani: this is {{bug|390889}} and we'll try to fix it for M7.
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''May 12, 2010:''' - McQ, Martin, John, Jeff, Dani
+
'''March 19, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ
* Remaining work for Release - John: Checklist (Docs, collective N&N etc... IP Logs end May)
+
* McQ - '''Congrats on Java 8 Release''' to coincide with the Oracle release
** [[Eclipse/Release checklist]], and [[Eclipse Doc Checklist]]. '''AI Dani''' has another one for Docs - will update for 3.6 and send offline
+
* Dani - '''Windows 8 Support''' - any answer to John's E-Mail ?
** [[Platform-releng-faq#Eclipse_Release_checklist]] also links to [[3.3 Release checklist]]
+
** McQ struggles with calling it a supported platform when nobody tests it; all we need to make sure is that somebody uses it
* IP Logs for subprojects - '''AI Jeff''' talk to Wayne to allow IP logs for container projects, also ask Boris (committer rep) - unsure if we have a committer rep on the IP Advisory committee, but we should have
+
** Send note to Wayne, the epp-dev list and cross-project
* Eclipse SDK 4.0 Naming
+
** Make it clear that running on Win8 is a useful contribution ... and we WON't put Win8 on supported platforms list if we don't get that confirmation
** John - from Mailing List discussion, "Eclipse SDK 4.0 Early Adopter Release" seemed to be the favorite one
+
** Next year's release will be 4.1. Ian going to prepare a landing page to send the right message, working with Boris and John
+
* API Deletion - luceneSearchParticipant
+
** Deprecation should include a migration path (if it exists).
+
** Will document deletions in the migration guide (and probably also in the README)
+
** Martin: Add a Bugzilla Keyword for API Deletions, will make it very easy to create a query for all pending API deletions
+
** Jeff: Whatever we do, current deletions should be examplary.
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''May 5, 2010:''' - McQ, Martin, John, Dani
+
'''March 12, 2014''' - Alex, Martin, McQ, John
* Martin - {{bug|309059}} root cert validity? - Tom investigating, no new info
+
* GTK - SWT team discussions
* Martin - How to mark issues for [[Polish3.6]] (UNC issues, Launcher vmargs {{bug|149994}}) - who sets the Bugzilla polish kwd?
+
* John - '''preparing for Java 8 release'''
** Martin to bring up again, and add to the Polish Wiki, and add the polish keyword on bz.
+
** Any Eclipse Platform committer is allowed to suggest items that bug him personally on the polish list (against any component).
+
* John - Helios Plan update
+
* John - API Removal
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Apr 28, 2010:''' - Jeff, Martin, John, McQ, Dani
+
'''March 5, 2014''' - John, Dani, Martin, Alex
* Martin - '''[[Eclipse/UNC_Paths]]''' - testing for 3.6 ? Bugzilla: [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwords&short_desc=unc&classification=Eclipse&classification=RT&product=Equinox&product=Platform&product=JDT&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=PDE All open with UNC in the summary]
+
* Dani: '''How to Avoid Spam in Gerrit''' - Bug in Bugzilla PMC bucket - consider offline
** Especially {{bug|289322}} and {{bug|262601}} are blocking for Martin, because these make it impossible to have Eclipse installed on an UNC path (common scenario in large organizations)
+
* Dani: '''Windows 8 Support'''
** Consensus: ''No concerted effort'', there are likely other more pressing issues; but ''investigate and prioritize what we find, and fix if possible''.
+
** Not listed in official plan
** <b><i>Running on UNC is considered a Polish item</i></b>.
+
** No technical problem, but lack of resources - only 1 machine on the IBM team and that's a VM
* Jeff, McQ - '''Eclipse 4.0 Naming'''
+
** Add as supported Platform for Luna, or wait another year ?
** Suggestion: "Eclipse 4.0 Indigo Preview"
+
** Most active development is on Linux and Windows 7 these days... agree with Dani that only active developer use helps finding real issues
** McQ: Don't want to send a negative message - it ''is'' usable though add-on support may be missing
+
** AI John: Send a note to eclipse-dev
** John: This is a new release of the Platform, but not all of Eclipse Foundation technology... unsure how to phrase that into a release name
+
*** Reaching out to Community to find an active user would be sufficient ... WPF or Win32 ? WPF is only a runtime target environment as of today.
** Jeff: Based on this, putting Indigo into the name is a negative and may trigger false assumptions
+
* Dani: '''State of GTK 3+'''
** McQ: ''Eclipse SDK 4.0 Developer Release'' - sends the right message
+
** Not yet fixed on Eclipse side, but GTK found a bug on their side that is going to be fixed; not yet sure though if that will fix everything
** Jeff: '''Come up with 3 or 4 suggestions and bounce these around'''. Start a public discussion. Check with other OSS projects, e.g. Andrew Overholt
+
** Launcher now has a fallback to GTK2 if it detects the partially supported GTK3 version
* McQ - '''1.5 BREE for Resources to support Unicode Characters'''
+
** Good collaboration after an initial warm-up phase ... Eclipse SWT considered an important-enough client to make fixes for
** Suggest everything on top of the base RCP move up to 1.5
+
** Alex: Concerned about users with a GTK 3.8 distro that update to GTK 3.10 and get the fallback to GTK 2 activated which has crashes with autocomplete in the browser
** Jeff: "Move when you need to and not before" - when do we "need to"
+
** On GTK 3.9 or newer, Launcher falls back to GTK 2 but that port is pretty much unmaintained, several other problems in there ... but not falling back is even worse
* John - '''[[Eclipse/API Central/API Removal Process]]
+
** Should be fine once distros start picking up paint / clipping issue fix (the not-drawing fix is still pending on SWT side)
** Just a compilation of things discussed before. '''Discuss on the Mailing List'''
+
* Alex: '''GTK 3 in Mars'''
* McQ - '''Pascal as the OBR spec lead'''
+
** Bump minimum required version to only use cairo and get rid of older calls - this causes confusion with GTK folk
** From point of view of the Eclipse Project, can't imagine what value we'd get from participating in OBR spec. IBM might care.
+
** RHEL 5 would no longer work
 +
** Thanks to SWT now requiring Java 1.5, can simplify the code wrt JNI
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Apr 21, 2010:''' - Jeff, Martin, John, Dani, McQ
+
'''February 26, 2014''' - Alex, John, Martin, McQ
* John - extended '''2 day test pass''' for M7 on Mon and Tue
+
* John: '''Orion Release''' this week
* Jeff - '''Eclipse 4.0 naming'''
+
** McQ hopes that Eclipse 4.0 will be good enough for public consumption - whatever we call it, it needs to be what we call it
+
** Jeff - the message should be that it's (a) new, (b) cool, (c) not quite done yet
+
** McQ - 4.0 won't be as performant as 3.x. Users will see the new cool presentation, but other than that it's like 3.6
+
** Biggest problem will be people who don't follow the Community and just get 4.0 because they heard about it
+
** Jeff - Comes down to setting expectations. Naming is one aspect of this, there's other aspects.
+
** John - Ian organized an e4-evangelist call.
+
** McQ - Most people will just consume the release train (Helios) anyways, and will notice that 4.0 is "different".
+
* Martin - {{bug|306822}} '''IncrementalBuilder.getRule()''' API addition: Ask James whether CDT Helios can pick up the change
+
* Martin - '''James for committer''' - move to public policy of only considering committed contributions
+
  
<hr/>
+
* Alex: '''Eclipse on ARM64'''
'''Apr 14, 2010:''' - John, Dani, Martin, Jeff
+
** Launcher and swt at first
* Martin - '''Startup Performance tests''': Cold start after reboot is 20% slower in 3.6m6 compared to 3.5.2 (while warm start is about the same)
+
** Had ports for other architectures in source form in the past, risk to get stale but helps getting the ball rolling
** Manual test: Reboot a minimal WinXP system, then start into a fresh workspace with 1 JDT project (20 files) 1 open file in the editor.
+
** John: Quite a lot steps to make a new Platform real - constants in OSGi, ... - but can happen piecemeal eg only do SWT first
** 28 sec in 3.5.2 but 36 sec in 3.6m6. Will file a bug tomorrow.
+
*** Martin: Would make sense to document the required steps for adding a new Platform while doing the job
** John: There are 2 startup performance tests in the suite, but they are unreliable. In 3.6, changed the way tests are installed (director rather than dropins), thus baseline is not helpful.
+
*** At least, write up the TODO list - in order to make it easier the next time
** Jeff: Try have a look at {{Bug|308157}} Jarfile cache now limited to 100. Reason might just be cycling through more Jar's.
+
** Should ask Tom Watson about OSGi constants
* John, Dani - '''Polish List'''
+
* John - '''e4 plan update'''. Waiting on McQ, wants an accurate list on what's graduating.
+
** Jeff - once something is in 4.0 you cannot remove in 4.x so better think twice before graduating.
+
** John - Eclipse SDK 4.0 has a minimal API exposed, most new stuff is under the covers so this is not so much of an issue.
+
** Jeff - More important to have Eclipse SDK 4.0 rock solid than have it feature complete. Do few things well rather than many things poorly.
+
** John - '''Self-hosting a day on Eclipse 4.0 without blocking issues!''' (But much to be polished, bugs, errors in the log etc).
+
* Jeff - '''Runtime SDK's vs "targets"''': The label SDK is ambiguous. Want to install tooling + target platform together, but cannot do that today.
+
** Today, we use "SDK" for (a) tools+source+docs, or (b) runtime+source+docs. None of both is really an SDK.
+
** Better call the target stuff just "targets".
+
** Developer docs as part of the tooling is wrong ... should be associated with targets instead.
+
** John: p2 does have the ability to install into multiple profiles (plan = multiple profiles)... might be (mis)used for this, is it a hack?
+
** Jeff: Much target provisioning was deferred off 3.6
+
  
<hr/>
+
* Dani: Update on '''GTK 3+ issue''' - bug filed against GTK, working on a workaround for fallback but not yet finished
'''Apr 7, 2010:''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Jeff, John
+
** Alex: Fix in GTK3 alone wouldn't work because SWT overrides GTK in that part
* Builds - short call
+
** McQ: If SWT API can't be implemented on top of new GTK API any more, discussion needs to happen
 +
*** If SWT does something wrong, would need pointers to what they should be doing instead...
 +
*** Maybe a couple phone calls to talk through the technical details
 +
*** Don't fight over things ... figure out what's the right thing to do, and just do it
  
<hr/>
 
'''Mar 31, 2010:''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, John
 
* Martin - '''EclipseCon Report'''
 
** General industry trend pointing up (as perceived on the exhibition floor); e4 rover great success! other strong topics included build (b3, buckminster, maven / tycho / nexus, athena...)
 
** e4 message in general very well positioned and received; git / egit was another hot topic
 
** Modeling and RT projects in an up trend, other projects seem to go slightly down in terms of Community interest as well as commercial involvement
 
** API Tutorial very well received, Martin going to work on a "Wiki" version of checklists and guidance, will notify AC when done
 
* John - Eclipse 4.0: Timing for graduating e4 incubation material into the Eclipse proper
 
** We cannot ship an Eclipse SDK out of the e4 project
 
** Want a clear message what Eclipse 4.0 is... probably "includes incubating components" like some EPP packages
 
** '''AI John''' talk to Mike and Ian
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''Mar 17, 2010:''' - McQ, Dani, Martin
 
* McQ: '''git''' vs CVS: Should there be contributions by Platform on Egit?
 
** Martin: Don't know how well egit proceeded recently, Boris might know more... important point is that the major workflows are perfect. Looks like the major workflows have been identified already.
 
* Martin: '''WebkitGTK / MiniBrowser''': In addition to the recent WebkitGTK discussion, perhaps work on a "Minibrowser" API that can live with published frozen Mozilla API only? Many apps may not need the full feature-richness of today's Browser.
 
** McQ unsure whether this is worthwile, since all industry trends go towards more web integration. '''AI Martin''' follow up with Grant
 
* Dani: '''Performance and Polish''' passes
 
** All teams need to fix the issues that Frederic finds. M7 is the performance and polish pass. Prioritize items.
 
* Dani: '''Freeze Plan'''
 
** Suggest a 2-day test pass (mon/tue) before the RC's, ie move 1 day from RC2 into M7
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''Mar 10, 2010:''' - McQ, Jeff, Martin, John
 
* John: '''Provisional API guidelines''' (removing the requirement to have "internal" in the package name) - important for e4 which will have a lot of provisional API.
 
** See also {{bug|261874}} and Wiki [[Provisional API Guidelines Update Proposal]]
 
** "Old School" wanted to make provisional API deliberately painful. Migrating "provisional" to real without renaming will make breakage more subtle
 
** The game has changed: Adding x-internal, friends and API Tooling works much better than before, making it clear where API is provisional
 
** Martin: Much in favor of this, do we have any markup beyond x-internal for (a) making provisional API more explicitly visible or (b) work on a smaller granularity such as just a class?
 
*** McQ: granularity smaller than package makes it too easy to pollute API
 
*** Jeff: would like x-api-status:=provisional markup instead of x-internal:=true ... better do it right than half-baken. Could probably come to a fairly fast consensus on MANIFEST markup
 
** Resolution Lets agree now that x-internal is sufficient for provisional API, and discuss further approvements in parallel. '''AI John''' to search existing bugs about provisional API markup and initiate a discussion on the eclipse-pmc mailing list.
 
* Jeff: '''Target Provisioning and PDE:''' Target components in Galileo (which cannot be installed into the host) - came up with sort of a hack which still confuses users
 
** Want just a little bit help in PDE to make target provisioning just a little bit better .. a number of PDE bugs related to this, many been deferred .. there will be new bugs coming to capture what can be done in the short term
 
** Resolution: will mark up those new bugs where they request PMC involvement
 
* McQ: '''Build Quality:''' There is traditionally a drop in quality around this time of year (API Freeze and Eclipsecon), plus infrastructure problems. It's not really bad but we need to be careful now.
 
** John: Resist the urge to put in extra fixes. We are past the test pass. Quality over function, especially now.
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''Mar 3, 2010:''' - Dani, Martin, McQ
 
* Martin: Remove org.eclipse.update.configurator and related bundles from SDK? As per {{bug|304505}} it makes Eclipse slow even when off.
 
** Dani: Might be more than a packaging issue, somebody would have to invest
 
** McQ: Should fix the Performance issue at any rate, regardless of other issues.
 
* John sick, Dani vacation next week.
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''Feb 24, 2010:''' - Dani, Martin, McQ
 
* Dani: Remove Java 7 support as a plan item due to (a) legal reasons and (b) Java 7 not being finished when Eclipse 3.6 ships
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''Feb 17, 2010:''' - Martin, Dani, John
 
* Martin: {{bug|196337}} Pushing CDT Spawner into the Platform?
 
** John, Dani: Platform could only accept it when there is use for it in the SDK. Otherwise it would just bloat the Platform
 
** Recommended best practice: Keep Spawner living in CDT, but put it into a separate bundle such that it can be used by others out of Helios or other p2 Repos
 
** The [[Nexus Project]], which was once meant to collect such micro functionality to be shared between projects was never successful. Similar requests (e.g. faceted projects) are consumed as individual bundles through p2 today, no matter in which project they have their home where they are developed.
 
* Martin: {{bug|301563}} Fast project import from snapshot data - UI or not?
 
** John: Want some UI in the Platform in order to test it more easily, e.g. an export wizard
 
* John: Webkit
 
** Foundation is considering allowing LGPL for exempt prereqs, but not for works-with .. missing a policy for dealing with LGPL works-with
 
** John: Our original reason for marking works-with is that the SWT browser can use either Mozilla or WebKit. However our long term direction is WebKit-only due to brittleness of the Mozilla API which keeps breaking us. There is an increasing number of distros bundling these WebKit libraries so there is a reasonable chance going forward that the library will already be present on the user's machine.
 
** Martin: Exempt works-with (optional) prereq is perfectly fine for Webkit, since there is a chance it's already there on a Platform (similar to Mozilla)
 
** Classifying it as such makes most sense for Product builders, who look at the prereqs to understand what they need to bundle with their Eclipse based product.
 
** PMC agreed to reclassify these libraries as exempt pre-req.
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''Feb 10, 2010:''' - John, Dani, McQ
 
* We agreed to list WebKitGTK and libsoup 2.4 as works-with prerequisites
 
* We need to find consensus on {{bug|243582}} (embedding source info in binaries)
 
* Discussed moving Ubuntu version on the plan from 9.04 to 10.04. It is too early to make this decision because release candidates of 10.04 are not yet available, but we will continue to monitor it and make the decision to move up (or not) later in the 3.6 cycle
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Feb 03, 2010:''' - Dani, Martin
+
'''February 19, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, John
* Dani: {{Bug|301563}} -  Fast project import from snapshot data
+
* Dani: '''Silenio to work on GTK issue?'''
** Has the feature been verified to really return the expected performance gain? - Martin: Yes, Cisco reports 10 minute -> 5 seconds improvement by using the feature on project import on their view (65000 files)
+
* John: '''GTK testing at the Eclipse Foundation'''
** Is the feature valuable without Index contributions from JDT / CDT? - Martin: Yes, even "plain" projects benefit when there are linked resources pointing to web folders through RSE/EFS since they can be browsed immediately and refresh can be reduced to what's really needed. But most benefit is gained when there is also a shared index to be imported for immediate use.
+
* John: '''e4 ML discussion about graduating some tools'''
** Dani proposed checkin into a branch for easier merge / review - Martin: Will start working with patches
+
** Model Editor, CSS Editor, CSS Spy, ...
** AI Martin: Contact Sharon regarding IP review (reserve a slot)
+
** Fairly late, but risk is rather low -- suggest putting into PDE
 +
** Dani concerns: No PDE committers available for handholding - and stuff is not polished; even Lars sees it in Luna+1
 +
** John: These tools would only be used by people building RCP apps
 +
** Martin: What is the goal of trying to graduate?
 +
*** If it's just about getting more exposure, perhaps keep in incubation and add to the RCP EPP Package ?
 +
** Alex would like adding new people / interested contributors to PDE
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jan 27, 2010:''' - John, Dani, McQ, Martin
+
'''February 5, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex
* Dani: Markus Keller taking over JDT UI
+
* Dani: '''Confcall Numbers:''' Skype into the US tollfree; Alex use SIP
* John: M6 Splashscreen for Eclipsecon: {{bug|297355}}
+
* Martin: Eclipse 4 vs Eclipse 3.x - will file defects
* McQ: Removing Builds - SWT needs Linux-Motif, so only WPF about to be removed
+
* Alex: Testing on modern Linux
** In discussions with Microsoft, it turned out that WPF is not required to get full Windows 7 experience under Win32
+
** XAML for styling was meant to be a cool idea but never got flying
+
** Socialize people with this -- find whether people are inerested in contributing on this, if yes then we should support them
+
* Still working the IBM approval process for travelling to Eclipsecon
+
* Avoid merging major feature work after a milestone's Tuesday test pass
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jan 20, 2010:''' - John, Dani, McQ, Martin
+
'''January 22, 2014''' - John, Dani, Alex, Martin
* McQ: Contacted Steve N, still interested but unlikely to get more energy for investing into Eclipse
+
* John, Alex: '''New GTK 3.10 breaking Eclipse on latest Fedora'''
* John: 3.5.2 test pass tomorrow, but yesterday's I-build been a mess
+
** Alex been looking at Browser
* McQ: Message about supporting Open JDK in a blog ... status should be "nice that it works but it's not a reference platform"
+
** Some Views not showing up - Silenio just back yesterday
 +
** Dani: For 4.4m5 and 4.3.2, will document issues in the README
 +
*** Considered a fallback to "gtk2" support in the Launcher, but that was considered too risky
 +
*** Silenio might have a workaround ... OK if the new code can be added conditionally for GTK 3.10 only
 +
* Dani: '''M5 Status'''
 +
** Still many open bugs not triaged - component leads should triage earlier
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jan 13, 2010:''' - John, Dani, McQ, Martin
+
'''January 15, 2014''' - McQ, Andrew, Dani, Martin
* McQ: U Manitoba students to help with technical communication (documentation, website, ...) for e4
+
* Dani: Lakshmi (SWT Team) going on maternity leave - SWT still a decent team of 4
* Dani: New way of contributing Capabilities for Helios... are we OK? - John: yes, Platform Capabilities are in the SDK feature
+
* Andrew: PMC Participation - Suggestion
** FYI: Incubating projects are
+
* Martin: Documenting the Platforms we routinely test on
+
** Unittest / Perftest machines are know. When John updated the Reference Platform doc, he made sure that he knows at least one committer on each platform
+
** A poll to know what Platform(s) are actively used (by committers) on milestone granularity would be very helpful - John going to set that up
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''Jan 6, 2010:''' - John, Dani, McQ, Jeff
+
'''January 8, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, Andrew, John, McQ
* Agreed on 3.5.2 [http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/plans/freeze_plan_3_5_2.php freeze plan]
+
* Dani: '''API Freeze''' with M6 on March 7, but JDT cannot put Java 8 stuff in before (March 18) thus will have to ask for an exception
** Note RC2 is a week earlier to avoid colliding with Helios M5 week
+
* Discussed Helios plan updates 2 {{bug|298200}}
+
** Update Java 7 plan item to indicate only working on publicly available bits. Some progress made on getting access to specs but going slowly.
+
** Update reference JRE's to latest version of each JRE
+
* Jeff will be away for next six weeks (vacation)
+
* McQ to contact Steve to see if he still wishes to remain on PMC
+
  
 
= Archive =
 
= Archive =
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2013 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2013]]
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2012 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2012]]
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2011 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2011]]
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2010 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2010]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2009 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2009]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2009 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2009]]

Revision as of 04:19, 22 August 2014

Documents

Some documents written and/or used by the PMC:

Meeting Schedule

The Eclipse Project PMC has a weekly phone meeting every wednesday at 10.30am EST.

Meeting Minutes

August 20, 2014 - John, Alex, Dani

  • Dani: new platform PowerPC 64-bit LE bug 441358
    • maintained by IBM
    • will be added to 4.4.1 as early access
    • Dani to send a note to cross-platform
  • Dani: individual made patches to support Solaris 64-bit bug 442266
    • we'd like to add it but don't have a machine to support it
    • important because our current 32-bit Solaris build will become obselete since there's no 32-bit JRE for Java 7 and beyond
    • Oracle should be interested since they provide both, Java and Solaris
    • Dani to ask Oracle

August 13, 2014 - McQ, Alex, Dani

  • Dani: Any feedback for the Mars plan?
    • McQ:
      • It does not cover Orion, but that is OK and like in previous release plans. Orion will most likely be moved to another top-level project soon.
      • We want to remove Mac OS X Universal 32-bit (all agreed)
  • Dani: How to deal with requests to push our bundles to repo.eclipse.org bug 441530
    • Dani: OK for me but we won't do the work
    • Alex: Maven needs the dependencies in the pom.xml. We don't want copy them from the manifest into the pom.xml and then maintain this. The pom should be updated when publishing the file into the Maven repo. Ideally by an automated task.
    • Conclusion: all agree with this, i.e. we won't do the actual work and we won't "pollute" our pom files.

August 6, 2014 - McQ, Dani

  • Dani: Will provide initial Mars plan next week



No meetings in July



Jun 4, 2014 - Dani, John, Martin, McQ, Alex

  • Dani: RC4 Status looking good
    • 1 bug in JDT, 1 bug in Debug and 1 in Platform/UI on Linux being investigated ("Show In" no longer working)
    • Rest of the team working on docs
    • Alex: On Ubuntu, might want to disable UBUNTU_MENUPROXY ... this is causing a lot of issues
  • John: Went over the N&N ... number of things went in after M7 :)
    • Dark Theme - Good story in place combining the old 3.x Presentation API with the new E4 (CSS) technology in a good way



Jun 11, 2014 - Martin, McQ, Alex, John

  • John: Eclipse Theming: When switching the OS Theme to dark, Eclipse should be aware
    • Dark Theme is currently a tech preview



Jun 4, 2014 - Dani, John, Martin, McQ, Alex

  • Dani: RC4 Status looking good
    • 1 bug in JDT, 1 bug in Debug and 1 in Platform/UI on Linux being investigated ("Show In" no longer working)
    • Rest of the team working on docs
    • Alex: On Ubuntu, might want to disable UBUNTU_MENUPROXY ... this is causing a lot of issues
  • John: Went over the N&N ... number of things went in after M7 :)
    • Dark Theme - Good story in place combining the old 3.x Presentation API with the new E4 (CSS) technology in a good way



May 28, 2014 - Dani, Alex, Martin

  • Dani: EOL'ing the Delta Pack - announce now, remove during Mars - it's been obsoleted by p2 functionality
    • Alex: Some of the test suite relied on the delta pack, it caused issues, OK with removing (PDE tests would need to be cleaned up)
  • Dani: Copyright Updates - tool is very slow since not ported from CVS properly, can run for hours
    • John: Worth doing periodically but probably won't matter legally since copyright lasts for 7 years
    • The change is not without risk (Dani: Could schedule after the release)
    • McQ: Should consider updating the tool as part of that work
    • Alex: Has a new intern, could use this as an opportunity to join
  • Dani: RC3 status - last planned build - looking good, except for Platform UI, where the list of bugs is still long
  • McQ: Discussions about a new Eclipse.org Web-based Toplevel Project



May 14, 2014 - Dani, Alex, John, Martin

  • Alex: SWT GTK3 and the Endgame Rules
  • Dani: Luna Plan Update
  • John: New Dashboard created by the EMO

May 7, 2014 - McQ, Dani, Alex, John, Martin

  • Martin bug 241957 - GTK clipboard hang
    • Alex: GTK guys recommended using the async API, but no time for more investigation
    • McQ: Switching a sync API to async implementation underneath can be extremely messy (need to be aware of all possible events and event sources...)
    • McQ: If there is an idea canceling the clipboard wait ... given that the issue occurs only rarely, even a hacky solution is better than nothing
  • Dani: will do a plan update, hopefully this week

April 30, 2014 - Dani, Martin, McQ

  • McQ: WB4 perspective customization - has it caused any issues ?
    • Martin: Dealing with detached views works differently (dragging a window fails - must drag the tab inside the window)
    • Dani: Saved perspectives / windows are lost on an existing workspace when moving from 3.x to 4.x
      • Martin/McQ: When crossing the major version boundary, it is OK to lose state - it's not nice but acceptable
    • Dani: The bigger problem is, that the whole "Perspective customization" dialog is still not working as expected
      • Martin: Agree with the concern, but the Perspective customization dialog wasn't ever great
      • McQ: If invest work here, rather make it good than bring back the previous status quo
      • Martin: Most customization done via plugin.xml / Java , don't expect end users to do a lot of customization themselves
  • Dani: M7 status
    • Defect triage under control - some items deferred to 4.5



April 23, 2014 - McQ, Dani, John, Alex, Martin

  • Alex - GTK2 or GTK3 as default - GTK3 it is
    • GTK2 - more stable on old systems but no usable browser due to
      • xulrunner - latest version not supported by swt and latest distros don't even ship standalone xulrunner
      • webkitgtk - gtk2 version in maintenance mode, upstream consider dropping, really crashy See [1]
    • GTK3 still has some drawing issues (fighting them one by one, but functionally everything is there)
    • McQ: If neither state is really good, need to choose the option that's moving forward (switch to GTK3)
  • Dani - Freeze Plan created
  • John - Hackathon in London proposed by Ian Skerret

April 16, 2014 - Dani, Alex

  • no topics today

April 9, 2014 - Dani, Martin, Alex

  • Dani - Kepler SR2 and Java 8
    • Planning Council: Can build and host the patches, but messaging must be clear as "SR2 with the patches applied". Still polishing words of the download pages.
    • Not added to aggregate repo ... one-time package without any updates
    • Feature patch available on Marketplace (for manual update) - for those starting from scratch they can now get "Kepler + Patch"
    • Not convinced that the extra downloads were necessary (early adopters already had the patch, new adopters can also get Luna) ... but current approach won't hurt.
  • John - Hard to review all incoming Platform/UI Contributions
    • Dani tried to jump in on some issues like Icons
    • Doubt that some of the work will really help bringing committers on board (such as the for loop conversion)
    • Some of the initial contributors of very simple things have now grown into contributing real interesting things
    • Getting more people involved in initial reviews (currently some 10 active committers, 4-5 fullday ones) - but mainly Eric and Paul review patches

April 2, 2014 - Dani, Alex, John, Martin

  • Dani - new GTK3+ issues
    • crash/hang when SWT AWT bridge is used, also affects JavaFX (bug 431330)
    • problems with main menu (bug 419830)
  • Dani - Submitting the IP Log for the Java 8 Work
    • Currently not qualified as a "release", only submitting the IP log.
  • Dani - need to approve API changes for Java 8 in M7
    • No API changes, only additions
    • Used / tested by JDT Core / JDT UI
    • ObjectTeams (Stephan Herrmann) was involved
    • There were no objections i.e. changes were approved
  • John - SWT over JavaFX
    • EclipseCon: Steve Northover thought it was possible, just a lot of work
    • Decide after Luna whether hosting in SWT or doing as a separate project
    • Relationship to Tom Schindl's e(fx)clipse project ?
      • e(fx)clipse is more about tooling, not so much about rendering ...
      • Tom seems to have an alpha version, but not actively working on it
      • Seem to need some additional API in SWT - patch sits in Gerrit with nobody putting any attention at the moment. Details in bug 426243
      • Having this API in place would make the JavaFX port simpler
        • It look good but Alex has no idea whether it's the best idea and how acceptable on all platforms
        • John: May make sense in the next release, API can't be a near-term thing ... needs some backers who can invest significant time in it
      • Doug Schaefer is also pushing for JavaFX



March 26, 2014 - John, Dani, Martin, Alex

  • John - EclipseCon Update
    • Slightly smaller than in the past, but VERY of positive attitude, LOT of excitement around Java 8 ... Oracle turned on the servers during one of the morning sessions
    • IoT / M2M - lots of demos on Raspberry Pi, many new projects
    • Very good content around Orion and Javascript, but a small crowd
    • Great opening keynote from Mike Milinkovich on the history and future of Eclipse - mentioned Flux
    • See also Blog Posts from Doug Schaefer and Ian Bull as well as top 5 from Ian
  • John - ARM port of GTK - any tracking items ?
    • Bug exists for Launchers on ARM64 ; several other items too
    • IBM PPC Little Endian port of SWT
    • Test on less used architectures like Solaris? - similar to the Windows 8 case...
    • Donating RHEL subscriptions to the Foundation was not accepted - John: Bug is open for having Hudson slaves run on other architectures
      • Example: bug 430698, bug 429237, bug 415757; bug 419855 talks about running virtualbox images on a vserver
      • Denis is investigating some way running Hudson / HIPP instances on other hardware ... GTK3, Windows etc tests need other hardware
      • Check for cost of hardware, companies to donate it, and people to maintain it (Security patches!)
        • Alex could imagine RH signing up for some maintenance ... test machines could be entirely outside Eclipse.org infrastructure, isolated as their own sandbox
        • Hudson needs access though, thus need to be careful about security
  • Alex - Java 8 vs Java 7 currently can't build an Eclipse SDK when the build machine has only one of the JDK's
    • In the past, it was possible to build with only Java 7 ... now, if I have Java 8 I cannot build (need Java 7 too)
    • ==> Update on March 27 by Dani: this is bug 390889 and we'll try to fix it for M7.

March 19, 2014 - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ

  • McQ - Congrats on Java 8 Release to coincide with the Oracle release
  • Dani - Windows 8 Support - any answer to John's E-Mail ?
    • McQ struggles with calling it a supported platform when nobody tests it; all we need to make sure is that somebody uses it
    • Send note to Wayne, the epp-dev list and cross-project
    • Make it clear that running on Win8 is a useful contribution ... and we WON't put Win8 on supported platforms list if we don't get that confirmation

March 12, 2014 - Alex, Martin, McQ, John

  • GTK - SWT team discussions
  • John - preparing for Java 8 release

March 5, 2014 - John, Dani, Martin, Alex

  • Dani: How to Avoid Spam in Gerrit - Bug in Bugzilla PMC bucket - consider offline
  • Dani: Windows 8 Support
    • Not listed in official plan
    • No technical problem, but lack of resources - only 1 machine on the IBM team and that's a VM
    • Add as supported Platform for Luna, or wait another year ?
    • Most active development is on Linux and Windows 7 these days... agree with Dani that only active developer use helps finding real issues
    • AI John: Send a note to eclipse-dev
      • Reaching out to Community to find an active user would be sufficient ... WPF or Win32 ? WPF is only a runtime target environment as of today.
  • Dani: State of GTK 3+
    • Not yet fixed on Eclipse side, but GTK found a bug on their side that is going to be fixed; not yet sure though if that will fix everything
    • Launcher now has a fallback to GTK2 if it detects the partially supported GTK3 version
    • Good collaboration after an initial warm-up phase ... Eclipse SWT considered an important-enough client to make fixes for
    • Alex: Concerned about users with a GTK 3.8 distro that update to GTK 3.10 and get the fallback to GTK 2 activated which has crashes with autocomplete in the browser
    • On GTK 3.9 or newer, Launcher falls back to GTK 2 but that port is pretty much unmaintained, several other problems in there ... but not falling back is even worse
    • Should be fine once distros start picking up paint / clipping issue fix (the not-drawing fix is still pending on SWT side)
  • Alex: GTK 3 in Mars
    • Bump minimum required version to only use cairo and get rid of older calls - this causes confusion with GTK folk
    • RHEL 5 would no longer work
    • Thanks to SWT now requiring Java 1.5, can simplify the code wrt JNI

February 26, 2014 - Alex, John, Martin, McQ

  • John: Orion Release this week
  • Alex: Eclipse on ARM64
    • Launcher and swt at first
    • Had ports for other architectures in source form in the past, risk to get stale but helps getting the ball rolling
    • John: Quite a lot steps to make a new Platform real - constants in OSGi, ... - but can happen piecemeal eg only do SWT first
      • Martin: Would make sense to document the required steps for adding a new Platform while doing the job
      • At least, write up the TODO list - in order to make it easier the next time
    • Should ask Tom Watson about OSGi constants
  • Dani: Update on GTK 3+ issue - bug filed against GTK, working on a workaround for fallback but not yet finished
    • Alex: Fix in GTK3 alone wouldn't work because SWT overrides GTK in that part
    • McQ: If SWT API can't be implemented on top of new GTK API any more, discussion needs to happen
      • If SWT does something wrong, would need pointers to what they should be doing instead...
      • Maybe a couple phone calls to talk through the technical details
      • Don't fight over things ... figure out what's the right thing to do, and just do it



February 19, 2014 - Dani, Alex, Martin, John

  • Dani: Silenio to work on GTK issue?
  • John: GTK testing at the Eclipse Foundation
  • John: e4 ML discussion about graduating some tools
    • Model Editor, CSS Editor, CSS Spy, ...
    • Fairly late, but risk is rather low -- suggest putting into PDE
    • Dani concerns: No PDE committers available for handholding - and stuff is not polished; even Lars sees it in Luna+1
    • John: These tools would only be used by people building RCP apps
    • Martin: What is the goal of trying to graduate?
      • If it's just about getting more exposure, perhaps keep in incubation and add to the RCP EPP Package ?
    • Alex would like adding new people / interested contributors to PDE

February 5, 2014 - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex

  • Dani: Confcall Numbers: Skype into the US tollfree; Alex use SIP
  • Martin: Eclipse 4 vs Eclipse 3.x - will file defects
  • Alex: Testing on modern Linux

January 22, 2014 - John, Dani, Alex, Martin

  • John, Alex: New GTK 3.10 breaking Eclipse on latest Fedora
    • Alex been looking at Browser
    • Some Views not showing up - Silenio just back yesterday
    • Dani: For 4.4m5 and 4.3.2, will document issues in the README
      • Considered a fallback to "gtk2" support in the Launcher, but that was considered too risky
      • Silenio might have a workaround ... OK if the new code can be added conditionally for GTK 3.10 only
  • Dani: M5 Status
    • Still many open bugs not triaged - component leads should triage earlier

January 15, 2014 - McQ, Andrew, Dani, Martin

  • Dani: Lakshmi (SWT Team) going on maternity leave - SWT still a decent team of 4
  • Andrew: PMC Participation - Suggestion

January 8, 2014 - Dani, Martin, Andrew, John, McQ

  • Dani: API Freeze with M6 on March 7, but JDT cannot put Java 8 stuff in before (March 18) thus will have to ask for an exception

Archive

Back to the top