Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Eclipse/PMC"

(Meeting Minutes)
(148 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
= Meeting Minutes =
 
= Meeting Minutes =
'''February 1, 2012:''' - Dani, Martin, John
+
'''April 16, 2014''' - Dani, Alex
* Dani: '''No UA Committers any more''' - move UA under Platform UI such that at least somebody can apply patches
+
* no topics today
** AI John check with Wayne ... UA is a subcomponent now, may not even need a move review.
+
* Dani: {{bug|343150}} git '''DenyNonFastForward'''
+
** Orion could eventually add tooling to support easy workflows in spite of deny on the repo ... but not in this release
+
** Ping on the bug again and proceed
+
* John: Decide when to switch 4.2 builds from re-using 3.x binary bundles vs full 4.x builds
+
** Today, the 4.x testsuite just tests 4.x specific stuff; things like JDT tests just run against 3.8 today
+
** Today, cannot generate Javadocs in 4.x today sine it needs the full source
+
** Today, nightlies are running 3.x only (could change to running 4.x nightlies only)
+
** Today, 3.x builds run at IBM and 4.x builds run at Eclipse.org
+
** Only few test failures left in the 4.x builds --> ready to switch
+
** AI: '''Kim''' to send 4.x test results to the mailing list, consider switching right after M5
+
** '''Performance Tests:''' Not yet run on 4.x yet - should be able to run on Denis' vserver
+
*** IBM is going to lose the physical machines for performance tests in 2 weeks ! (Going to migrate to vserver too!)
+
*** Need a new baseline
+
** Andrew: at '''FOSSLC''' in Brussels this week, going to represent Eclipse with Mike Milinkovich, Gunnar Wagenknecht and others
+
* '''Gerrit''': Platform won't jump in as an early adopter this time, wait for other projects first
+
** Not all Platform Unittests can run on Hudson today (need at least some fingerprint tests to get value from Gerrit)
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''January 25, 2012:''' - McQ, John, Martin, Andrew, Dani
 
* McQ: '''Note about 4.2 on Release Train'''
 
* Andrew: '''Eclipse 4.2 for Fedora''' - Feature note written for Eclipse Juno led to some discussion at Eng.Steering Committee, but finally approved
 
* Dani: Team down by 1 but no impact (Dani is going to take over responsibilities)
 
* John: '''Build Failures in UA, Update, PDE, p2 yesterday''' after the move to Java 7... nobody watching these, need to find caretakers
 
** UA tests often fail due to a link validity checker, these can be caused by anyone
 
** Certificate Validity issue (Jar signing)
 
  
 +
'''April 9, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, Alex
 +
* Dani - '''Kepler SR2 and Java 8'''
 +
** Planning Council: Can build and host the patches, but messaging must be clear as "SR2 with the patches applied". Still polishing words of the download pages.
 +
** Not added to aggregate repo ... one-time package without any updates
 +
** Feature patch available on Marketplace (for manual update) - for those starting from scratch they can now get "Kepler + Patch"
 +
** Not convinced that the extra downloads were necessary (early adopters already had the patch, new adopters can also get Luna) ... but current approach won't hurt.
  
<hr/>
+
* John - '''Hard to review all incoming Platform/UI Contributions'''
'''January 18, 2012:''' - McQ, John, Martin, Andrew, Dani
+
** Dani tried to jump in on some issues like Icons
* McQ: '''4.2 quality''' and next steps
+
** Doubt that some of the work will really help bringing committers on board (such as the for loop conversion)
** More resources found to enable 4.2 as the LTS base - encouraging, although some items still missing
+
** Some of the initial contributors of very simple things have now grown into contributing real interesting things
** Fedora 17 think about shipping 4.2m6 (work ongoing) - that would be a large stack on top of 4.2
+
** Getting more people involved in initial reviews (currently some 10 active committers, 4-5 fullday ones) - but mainly Eric and Paul review patches
** John: '''Oracle Java 7 as Reference Platform''' now that the most severe issues are fixed (Java 6 EOL is June 2012 !) - that is Oracle, not OpenJDK
+
*** Not remove Java 6 for now
+
*** Fedora also does all tests on 7
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''January 11, 2012:''' - McQ, John, Dani, Martin, Andrew
 
* McQ: '''State of Presentation API's'''
 
** Different API's in 4.2 and 3.x -- will need to deprecate API in 3.x
 
** Christian suggested deleting API that's not implemented in 4.x to get compile errors ... John thinks that binary compatibility is more important
 
*** Plugins will be "mostly OK", presentation API is cosmetic anyways
 
** McQ: get in touch with clients who use presentation API, telling them what's best to do ... often newer 4.x infrastructure is much better than trying to keep 3.x around forever
 
* Andrew: '''Cairo and GTK3'''
 
* John: '''4.2 compiling now'''
 
* Martin: '''Updated JSch-0.1.44 version''' - how to announce properly
 
** AI Martin Announce on eclipse-dev and cross-project
 
** Should also put into migrtion notes and README
 
  
<hr/>
+
'''April 2, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, John, Martin
'''January 4, 2012:''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Andrew
+
* Dani - new GTK3+ issues
* McQ: Pascal's note about p2 leadership .. not sure who could step in and make a commitment (may see the same fate as UA)
+
** crash/hang when SWT AWT bridge is used, also affects JavaFX ({{bug|431330}})
** Tom Watson looking for candidates, but looks like none in McQ's team
+
** problems with main menu ({{bug|419830}})
 +
* Dani - '''Submitting the IP Log for the Java 8 Work'''
 +
** Currently not qualified as a "release", only submitting the IP log.
 +
* Dani - need to '''approve API changes for Java 8 in M7'''
 +
** No API changes, only additions
 +
** Used / tested by JDT Core / JDT UI
 +
** ObjectTeams (Stephan Herrmann) was involved
 +
** There were no objections i.e. changes were approved
 +
* John - '''SWT over JavaFX'''
 +
** EclipseCon: Steve Northover thought it was possible, just a lot of work
 +
** Decide after Luna whether hosting in SWT or doing as a separate project
 +
** Relationship to Tom Schindl's [http://www.eclipse.org/efxclipse/index.html e(fx)clipse project] ?
 +
*** e(fx)clipse is more about tooling, not so much about rendering ...
 +
*** Tom seems to have an alpha version, but not actively working on it
 +
*** Seem to need some additional API in SWT - patch sits in Gerrit with nobody putting any attention at the moment. Details in {{bug|426243}}
 +
*** Having this API in place would make the JavaFX port simpler
 +
**** It look good but Alex has no idea whether it's the best idea and how acceptable on all platforms
 +
**** John: May make sense in the next release, API can't be a near-term thing ... needs some backers who can invest significant time in it
 +
*** Doug Schaefer is also pushing for JavaFX
  
<hr/>
 
'''December 14, 2011:''' - McQ, Dani, John, Martin, Andrew
 
* API Tooling Baseline comparison 3.7 vs 4.2 -- problematic since API was copied
 
* {{bug|343150}} git '''denyNonFastForward''' ie forbid commits that rewrite history ... looking for general policy ... Eclipse Project to adopt immediately.
 
** Andrew: Denis may roll out the change to all repos
 
** Resolution: Wait until after Christmas, if not rolled out by then move forward ourselves
 
* McQ (Tom Watson): '''Leadership for p2 team'''
 
* John: '''4.2 Builder switching to Hudson for M5''' - not all of the UI tests compile
 
** Lot of test failures
 
** Just flip the switch to Hudson, and live with failures at some point ... (and commit to fixing test failures as fast as we can)
 
** Fixing a components' test is the component team's job.
 
* Vacations: '''Skip next 2 weeks'''
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''December 7, 2011:''' - Dani, John, Andrew, Martin
+
'''March 26, 2014''' - John, Dani, Martin, Alex
* Martin: {{bug|365908}} with 4.2m4 not picking up extensions from dropins/
+
* John - '''EclipseCon Update'''
* John / Dani - XML problems breaking the build due to a "Help Index Generation" ant task
+
** Slightly smaller than in the past, but VERY of positive attitude, LOT of excitement around Java 8 ... Oracle turned on the servers during one of the morning sessions
* John / Anrew - '''Hudson Failures''', Platform fortunately not there
+
** IoT / M2M - lots of demos on Raspberry Pi, many new projects
** Reasons: Hudson can't tag and can't deploy to downloads
+
** Very good content around Orion and Javascript, but a small crowd
** John: It makes sense that the Hudson user can't write to the Repo
+
** Great opening keynote from Mike Milinkovich on the history and future of Eclipse - mentioned Flux
** Orion: Start from a shellscript (for tagging), then kick off a Hudson build partway through
+
** See also Blog Posts from [http://cdtdoug.ca/ Doug Schaefer] and [http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/author/irbull/ Ian Bull] as well as [https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/news/top-5-ian-bull top 5 from Ian]
 +
* John - '''ARM port of GTK''' - any tracking items ?
 +
** Bug exists for Launchers on ARM64 ; several other items too
 +
** IBM PPC Little Endian port of SWT
 +
** Test on less used architectures like Solaris? - similar to the Windows 8 case...
 +
** Donating RHEL subscriptions to the Foundation was not accepted - John: Bug is open for having Hudson slaves run on other architectures
 +
*** Example: {{bug|430698}}, {{bug|429237}}, {{bug|415757}}; {{bug|419855}} talks about running virtualbox images on a vserver
 +
*** Denis is investigating some way running Hudson / HIPP instances on other hardware ... GTK3, Windows etc tests need other hardware
 +
*** Check for cost of hardware, companies to donate it, and people to maintain it (Security patches!)
 +
**** Alex could imagine RH signing up for some maintenance ... test machines could be entirely outside Eclipse.org infrastructure, isolated as their own sandbox
 +
**** Hudson needs access though, thus need to be careful about security
 +
* Alex - '''Java 8 vs Java 7''' currently can't build an Eclipse SDK when the build machine has only one of the JDK's
 +
** In the past, it was possible to build with only Java 7 ... now, if I have Java 8 I cannot build (need Java 7 too)
 +
** ==> Update on March 27 by Dani: this is {{bug|390889}} and we'll try to fix it for M7.
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''November 30, 2011:''' - Dani, John, Andrew, Martin, McQ
+
'''March 19, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ
* Andrew - '''Long Term Support'''. McQ - Overlap is in the build technology, can't be done for Juno (still busy with git + hudson), but happy to consume what's being developed
+
* McQ - '''Congrats on Java 8 Release''' to coincide with the Oracle release
** Foundation contracted with Sonatype (Igor) for moving to Tycho, but just analyzing the current build may take 4 months
+
* Dani - '''Windows 8 Support''' - any answer to John's E-Mail ?
** Linuxtools currently using a small ant wrapper which just calls the Platform build (generate a source tarball such that linux distros can consume Platform from source;
+
** McQ struggles with calling it a supported platform when nobody tests it; all we need to make sure is that somebody uses it
* Martin - '''User Assistance Situation'''
+
** Send note to Wayne, the epp-dev list and cross-project
** Chris G moved to Jazz - Rest of the IBM team completely maxed already, would fix critical security defects only
+
** Make it clear that running on Win8 is a useful contribution ... and we WON't put Win8 on supported platforms list if we don't get that confirmation
** Some work has been done by other IBM committers.. could release patches, but can't be responsive to fixes
+
** There's an opportunity for others in the Community to step in and set the direction
+
** McQ: The only one most important issue at the moment is compliance with the new US Government accessibility regulations
+
** Newer Lucene; Help Search Stemming problems; nobody actively tracking the inbox
+
** John: Have been moving "committer-less" components into the general Platform component where 12+ committers have commit rights
+
** McQ: Platform project Zombies is OK, but having somebody step up would be better
+
** John: 3rd party dependencies... help has a few, eg upgrading to Jetty (managed by Chris before he left)
+
*** Lucene: Merged with SOLR, then 3 releases came out in the past 3 months, no Foundation CQ's in ... John interested in adopting Orion
+
*** Been in contact with Gunnar Wagenknecht who is also interested, but newer Lucene pulls in more dependencies than it needs
+
** Failing Search : would need an exact bug report where the search is failing, then McQ could get product teams excited
+
** John: Orion problem with older lucene is that it's leaking file handles ... less of a problem for Platform where we index only once
+
* John - {{bug|363948}} '''Eclipse 3.8 to 4.2 update'''
+
** Fix would involve changing metadata in p2 such that a 3.8 update wouldn't find 4.2 automatically, unless a specific update is requested
+
** That fix leverages what Pascal from p2 considers a bug
+
** Products could manage the problem by not adding the Juno repository.. but there's lots of things in Juno that people would want (eg egit, cdt, ...)
+
*** Fix that John thinks about would be on the product level
+
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''November 23, 2011:''' - Dani, John, Andrew
+
'''March 12, 2014''' - Alex, Martin, McQ, John
* Discussion of whether to turn on auto-tagging in maintenance builds. General agreement this is a good idea. We would not have a separate "integration" branch for maintenance streams.
+
* GTK - SWT team discussions
* Some discussion of EclipseCon submissions. PC voting is underway and program should be decided in the next two weeks. There is a great program of submissions so far, and it will be tough to select the talks that will make the cut.
+
* John - '''preparing for Java 8 release'''
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''October 26, 2011:''' - Dani, John, Andrew, McQ
+
'''March 5, 2014''' - John, Dani, Martin, Alex
 
+
* Dani: '''How to Avoid Spam in Gerrit''' - Bug in Bugzilla PMC bucket - consider offline
* Approve Paul Webster as Platform UI project lead
+
* Dani: '''Windows 8 Support'''
** Committer vote [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/platform-ui-dev/msg04980.html here].
+
** Not listed in official plan
** The PMC members unanimously approve this nomination
+
** No technical problem, but lack of resources - only 1 machine on the IBM team and that's a VM
** John to send note to EMO
+
** Add as supported Platform for Luna, or wait another year ?
* Some discussion of the Eclipse Platform UI Git disaster - {{bug|361707}}
+
** Most active development is on Linux and Windows 7 these days... agree with Dani that only active developer use helps finding real issues
** Currently any committer can delete everything from the repository permanently
+
** AI John: Send a note to eclipse-dev
** The commit hook prevents committers from restoring commits made by others that they have in their local clone
+
*** Reaching out to Community to find an active user would be sufficient ... WPF or Win32 ? WPF is only a runtime target environment as of today.
**  
+
* Dani: '''State of GTK 3+'''
 +
** Not yet fixed on Eclipse side, but GTK found a bug on their side that is going to be fixed; not yet sure though if that will fix everything
 +
** Launcher now has a fallback to GTK2 if it detects the partially supported GTK3 version
 +
** Good collaboration after an initial warm-up phase ... Eclipse SWT considered an important-enough client to make fixes for
 +
** Alex: Concerned about users with a GTK 3.8 distro that update to GTK 3.10 and get the fallback to GTK 2 activated which has crashes with autocomplete in the browser
 +
** On GTK 3.9 or newer, Launcher falls back to GTK 2 but that port is pretty much unmaintained, several other problems in there ... but not falling back is even worse
 +
** Should be fine once distros start picking up paint / clipping issue fix (the not-drawing fix is still pending on SWT side)
 +
* Alex: '''GTK 3 in Mars'''
 +
** Bump minimum required version to only use cairo and get rid of older calls - this causes confusion with GTK folk
 +
** RHEL 5 would no longer work
 +
** Thanks to SWT now requiring Java 1.5, can simplify the code wrt JNI
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''October 12, 2011:''' - Dani, John, Martin, McQ
+
'''February 26, 2014''' - Alex, John, Martin, McQ
* PMC upstaffing - looking for more Community input
+
* John: '''Orion Release''' this week
* egit bug backlog
+
* e4 builds
+
* p2 downloadable archived repos
+
* Moving to 4.x
+
** Community is moving ... any product that's not planned for EOL needs to move
+
  
<hr/>
+
* Alex: '''Eclipse on ARM64'''
'''October 5, 2011:''' - Dani, John, McQ
+
** Launcher and swt at first
* Some discussion of removing CVS from the SDK ({{bug|359466}}). There is no strong argument for removing it, so it is hard to argue for disruption to user community. In the end we would like CVS to be removed and would like it to be just as easy to install any SCM into the platform. We would like to see the p2 discovery UI used to make it trivial to add SCM support into SDK (Help > Add Version Control > CVS). Once we had that in place we would be in a better position to remove CVS by default.
+
** Had ports for other architectures in source form in the past, risk to get stale but helps getting the ball rolling
* We also discussed the Git line delimiter problems. Current recommendation:
+
** John: Quite a lot steps to make a new Platform real - constants in OSGi, ... - but can happen piecemeal eg only do SWT first
** core.autocrlf=false - not honoured by JGit so this makes things worse
+
*** Martin: Would make sense to document the required steps for adding a new Platform while doing the job
** Use Global workspace setting to use Unix line feeds by default
+
*** At least, write up the TODO list - in order to make it easier the next time
** Encourage projects to add a project-specific setting to use Unix line feeds
+
** Should ask Tom Watson about OSGi constants
  
<hr/>
+
* Dani: Update on '''GTK 3+ issue''' - bug filed against GTK, working on a workaround for fallback but not yet finished
'''September 21, 2011:''' - Dani, John, Martin
+
** Alex: Fix in GTK3 alone wouldn't work because SWT overrides GTK in that part
* Dani: '''git''' - Mac / Linux using scripts, tooling not yet ready for Windows ... productivity lacks
+
** McQ: If SWT API can't be implemented on top of new GTK API any more, discussion needs to happen
** painful when working across multiple repositories ... problematic workflow for reviewing incoming changes
+
*** If SWT does something wrong, would need pointers to what they should be doing instead...
** John: egit could fetch automatically in the background (without merge)
+
*** Maybe a couple phone calls to talk through the technical details
* John: '''used platforms poll'''
+
*** Don't fight over things ... figure out what's the right thing to do, and just do it
** Results visible once voted: [http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/platform-poll.php platform-poll.php]
+
  
<hr/>
 
'''September 14, 2011:''' - John, McQ, Dani, Martin
 
* Martin: '''PMC membership''' - still looking for people to ask after Steve and Jeff left
 
* John: '''Jetty 8''' - should be using Jetty from Eclipse (Jetty 7 ist stable, Jetty 8 is current) but API changes after Jetty 6
 
** eg standalone help - AI John to ping Chris G;
 
** No longer re-exporting Jetty API since 3.6 (deprecated api, introduced replacements)
 
** releng, would need Jetty at -1 if using current from train .. makes builds a bit more messy again
 
** check with Equinox
 
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''September 7, 2011:''' - John, McQ
+
'''February 19, 2014''' - Dani, Alex, Martin, John
* State of building Juno at eclipse.org: we are close but still some issues with the tests. Transition to Git halted our progress on this. Once the Git migration is complete, we should just make the switch over and live with the pain of some failing tests. Component teams will need to help with diagnosing problems with their tests.
+
* Dani: '''Silenio to work on GTK issue?'''
 +
* John: '''GTK testing at the Eclipse Foundation'''
 +
* John: '''e4 ML discussion about graduating some tools'''
 +
** Model Editor, CSS Editor, CSS Spy, ...
 +
** Fairly late, but risk is rather low -- suggest putting into PDE
 +
** Dani concerns: No PDE committers available for handholding - and stuff is not polished; even Lars sees it in Luna+1
 +
** John: These tools would only be used by people building RCP apps
 +
** Martin: What is the goal of trying to graduate?
 +
*** If it's just about getting more exposure, perhaps keep in incubation and add to the RCP EPP Package ?
 +
** Alex would like adding new people / interested contributors to PDE
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
'''August 31, 2011:''' - Dani, John
+
'''February 5, 2014''' - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex
 
+
* Dani: '''Confcall Numbers:''' Skype into the US tollfree; Alex use SIP
* We need to pull the new ICU4J out of maintenance release because the fix didn't pass review in time. We will defer to Indigo SR2
+
* Martin: Eclipse 4 vs Eclipse 3.x - will file defects
* Some discussion of the treatment of tags in Git vs CVS. Committers need to be aware they can't checkout the contents of a particular build into their workspace all at once.
+
* Alex: Testing on modern Linux
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
 
+
'''January 22, 2014''' - John, Dani, Alex, Martin
'''August 24, 2011:''' - Dani, John
+
* John, Alex: '''New GTK 3.10 breaking Eclipse on latest Fedora'''
* EGit is far behind on level of polish, usability, robustness, conforming to UI guidelines, etc. We may need to make contributions to avoid it hurting productivity
+
** Alex been looking at Browser
* Proposed workflow changes in bugzilla 4.0: {{bug|337245}}. Proposing removing NEW, ASSIGNED and CLOSED states which would lose valuable information for us.
+
** Some Views not showing up - Silenio just back yesterday
 +
** Dani: For 4.4m5 and 4.3.2, will document issues in the README
 +
*** Considered a fallback to "gtk2" support in the Launcher, but that was considered too risky
 +
*** Silenio might have a workaround ... OK if the new code can be added conditionally for GTK 3.10 only
 +
* Dani: '''M5 Status'''
 +
** Still many open bugs not triaged - component leads should triage earlier
  
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
 +
'''January 15, 2014''' - McQ, Andrew, Dani, Martin
 +
* Dani: Lakshmi (SWT Team) going on maternity leave - SWT still a decent team of 4
 +
* Andrew: PMC Participation - Suggestion
  
'''August 10, 2011:''' - Dani, Martin, McQ, John
 
* Dani / Martin - '''Debug Flexible Hierarchy "provisional.api" namespace'''
 
** Cannot be moved into an "API" namespace without breaking external non-SDK clients since types are leaked from internal packages
 
** Q1: Move framework to a place outside Debug?
 
** Q2: Declare "internal" packages as API? - API Tools won't be usable
 
** McQ: Is it really impossible to add new API in parallel while keeping the old one in place for now?
 
*** Issues: (1) Performance, (2) bugs due to delegating, (3) is it worth doing that work? CDT already marked x-friends - Debug could offer the same for other clients.
 
** McQ: Do we anticipate a huge Community out there just waiting for stuff to become full API? Then it's probably worth it...
 
*** But at this point any potential consumers already consume, so it's likely not worth the pain of renaming
 
*** Dani's suggestion: Go into a separate bundle and re-export, such that clients don't need debug
 
** John: Unless packages were intended to be API from the beginning, it's likely not API quality (that's likely also why Boris didn't want it in Jface)
 
** Martin: Would really want to see namespace refactored... quality standards..
 
** John: Had the experience in p2, it was much more than just package renaming
 
*** Very painful for user community, but in the end produced a much better results (but p2 was very young at that time)
 
** McQ: Can we provide backward compatible versions in parallel to the new namespace? We CANNOT break consumers.
 
*** Renaming only makes sense if mirroring/proxying is possible.
 
*** Lots of consumers in the old form, how many new consumers would we gain in the new form?
 
** Martin: Create a fork / clone on the UI side for new consumers, as real API?
 
*** McQ: Only makes sense if there's a community just waiting to pick this up.
 
*** Dani: Debug itself could not move to the new framework without breaking clients ... so we'd not have any clients inside the SDK
 
** McQ: It's non-trivial work, and before starting it we'd need to verify there's consumers for it
 
** Learnings from the past: Not keep stuff in provisional for so long any more
 
** Resolution: '''Pawel to find consumers for a refactored new bundle, then decide if / how to do the work'''
 
* Dani: '''Java 7 - Segfault due to loop optimizations''' ([http://www.infoq.com/news/2011/08/java7-hotspot details])
 
** Occurs a lot inside Apache Lucene, how to communicate that?
 
** McQ: send to eclipse-dev and cross-project
 
** Oracle aware of the issue - working on an early refresh, workaround exists (disable loop optimizations via -XX:-UseLoopPredicate)
 
** Another JIT bug was fixed by Oracle before GA because we reported it
 
** AI Dani '''Talk to Oracle when an update can be expected, soon send a message to eclipse-dev / cross-project'''
 
* Vacation notices:
 
** Martin: away from August 14 to September 1
 
** McQ: away from August 22 to September 5
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''August 3, 2011:''' - Dani, Martin, McQ
 
* Dani - successfully moved Java 7 support to 3.7.1, 3.8, 4.1.1 and 4.2 streams
 
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''July 27, 2011:''' - Dani, John, McQ
 
* Discussed how many versions back PDE should support development on. Historically we used N-2 but currently it is N-7. The layers of compatibility are starting to become hard to manage. We agreed dropping support for versions prior to 3.6 is ok if there is a benefit in doing so (cleans up PDE, makes the situation less confusing for end user, etc). However PDE must handle existing plugins with old version numbers in the plugin.xml (possibly with a warning and a quick fix to update/remove the number).
 
* We have some rough days ahead: first release train milestone on 4.x, ongoing build pain from Git migration, merge of Java 7 into mainline, and lots of people on holidays. Hold onto your hats!
 
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''July 20, 2011:''' - Dani, Martin, John, Jeff
 
* Dani - '''p2 Installer {{bug|317785}}''' affects Java 7 users - when they want to update it looks like they are dead
 
** Regression test only fails once every 100 times .. might be more often in the wild
 
** Might need some note on the download page (clickthrough) - people dont read the readme
 
* John - '''git migration''' - parts from git / parts from CVS isn't that bad for now
 
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''July 13, 2011:''' - McQ, Dani, Martin
 
* Want more Community involvement in the Eclipse PMC - "outside representation" in addition to companies with a commercial interest
 
* nice Java 7 webcast last week - Mike Milinkovich mentions our Eclipse Java 7 Support (BETA)
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''July 6, 2011:''' - John, Dani, Martin
 
* Dani - on track with Java 7 work; Oracle interested in having good Eclipse support
 
* git migration - Platform UI likely going to move this week
 
** Paul has a tool for gathering build notes from git (currently a commandline script)
 
 
<hr id="20110615"/>
 
'''June 15, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Dani, Martin, Jeff
 
* John - '''git migration''': should egit be part of the SDK ?
 
** Build-time circular dependencies. Keep SDK small, but make it a very simple and obvious step to obtain egit.
 
** It's already easy to update - milestone to mileston SDK update is a single step for SDK + egit.
 
* John - '''git migration''' and the mapfiles
 
** In orion, just tag HEAD of the build branch
 
** Dani: need to make sure that build notes can still be created
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''June 1, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Dani
 
* Some discussion of proposed Eclipse Foundation security policy
 
* We still want to see the disclosure time-frame being 3 months after the release containing the fix. Not all of our consumer community has the build technology or expertise to apply source patches to their products. Making sure the fix is in a maintenance release is the only practical way for some people to consume fixes
 
* It would be nice for critical security fixes to appear in the simultaneous release repository even after the SR2 time period. p2 would need some small amount of work to be able to flag critical/security patches and automatically notify the user about them being available. Nobody has signed up to do this work.
 
* Some discussion of Git migration. There is no need to move everything at once since our build can handle homogeneous inputs from both CVS and Git. One possibility is migrating Equinox as a first step. The most complicated piece is migrating the repository containing the builder itself. We will need to decide on where map files and documentation go: likely some kind of "common" repository for Eclipse TLP.
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''May 25, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Dani, Martin
 
* Missing CQ's for old legacy stuff in old update sites / repos
 
** No problem for ZIP's (we can move to archive)
 
** OK with removing some legacy old stuff... How many years back to keep old stuff?
 
* Java 7 and 3.7.1
 
** Mike M OK with including in 3.7.1 (when it's stable enough)
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''May 4, 2011:''' - Jeff, Dani, Martin, McQ, John
 
 
* RC1 test pass went well overall
 
* Investigating an SWT blocker preventing checkbox tables from working
 
* There is a problem with the Ant mail task with Ant 1.8. Ant mail requires an optional extra jar to be added. In Ant 1.7 this didn't cause build to fail, but in Ant 1.8 it does. Our conclusion was to document in the migration guide but take no other action.
 
* Git migration:
 
** Kim and DJ are investigating migration of the build to Git. Making progress but don't have a full build working yet
 
** We should consider summer 2011 for migration. For those teams with forked code between 3.x/4.x, they are finding it difficult to keep fixes in sync and potentially git can help with that.
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''April 27, 2011:''' - Jeff, Dani, Martin, McQ, John
 
* Dani '''still 100 bugs tagged 3.7''' - need to remind in the archcall to properly tag target milestones
 
* John '''EDL for Examples'''
 
** Value of examples is they're there to be used - there's no business value in holding on to IP via Copyright so EDL seems right
 
** Re-licensing existing examples is difficult (eg SWT examples); but new examples should go under EDL
 
** Including examples in distributed features must take care of fixing abouts
 
* John '''3.7 plan final update''': all plan items committed or deferred; update to RH6
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''April 20, 2011:''' - Jeff, Dani, Martin, McQ, John
 
* Jeff,Martin '''Builds at Eclipse''' - Work ongoing. IBM Mac has been donated. Mac testing has problems with some weird vnc bug
 
** Martin - could kick a 3.6.2+ build and artifacts OK, but confused by lots of warning messages. Kim responded immediately, but can this be made "more official" ?
 
** Public Builds - get the engineering underpinnings in place, then polish afterwards
 
** Won't get a lot better in 3.7 but could make it a plan item for 3.8
 
** John agrees that improving the warning messages to be more informative is a good thing - Kim's very helpful
 
* Dani '''Polish Bug to be prioritized''': {{bug|342648}} In SWT on Linux, RTL mode, Tree.getItem(Point) gives invalid result.
 
** Regression ?
 
** McQ: Every GTK version needs work - maybe it's specific to a new GTK; might be more than a P2
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''April 13, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Martin, Dani, Jeff
 
* John: reminder to review proposed project charter update
 
* Freeze plan for Indigo is ready
 
* Reviewed new polish items
 
* Investigating some 4.1 compatibility problems, possibly related to EMF changes
 
<hr/>
 
 
'''March 30, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Martin, Dani
 
* Discussed and clarified the API approval guidelines. Will be announced in the arch call.
 
* Dani - Java 7 deferred from 3.7. GA planned together with 3.7.1.
 
** John: is feature work which might need review
 
* John - we need to prepare the Git migration
 
** John to ask DJ to do investigations
 
<hr/>
 
 
'''March 23, 2011:''' - McQ, Dani
 
* Prioritized the [[Polish3.7]] list. This is a recurring task for the next few weeks.
 
* Discussed and agreed on API change approval process, see [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse-pmc/msg01368.html PMC mailing list note].
 
<hr/>
 
 
'''March 9, 2011:''' - John, McQ
 
 
* Ongoing discussion of direction for 2012 release train. Will continue discussion in email to ensure all PMC members are involved.
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''March 2, 2011:'''
 
* McQ - Migrating to 4.x. Don't be disruptive when there is no need to. Want to avoid migration pain.
 
** New feature work will be in 4.x, but as long as there are committers working on 3.x it will stay alive
 
** Make sure that quality keeps up: Releng / Build, make long-term committers continue reviewing contributions
 
** Problem with 4.x is just the bugs (impeding productivity), it's not anything architectural
 
** '''Convene again next week and come up with a consistent message''', AI McQ get hold of Jeff for a statement
 
* John - '''3.6.2+ builds''' set up on Hudson now
 
** Kim's {{bug|338557}} Job's mostly ready, Martin is the first tester. Should inform the Community once things go smoothly
 
** Updating version numbers like going to a virtual never-existing "3.6.3" release in order to give a clear and consistent message
 
** Dani has an (internal) document - Martin: interested for TM and CDT projects - '''AI Dani''' send Doc to Martin for for meeting notes
 
** Always updating the micro by one only ... so if bundle was not updated in Helios SR1 or SR2, it should go .1 in 3.6.2+
 
 
'''February 23, 2011:'''
 
* Martin - '''3.6.2+ M-Builds post 3.6.2''' - needed for adopters to get 3.6.2+ bundles signed; on demand only? If scheduled, how often?
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''February 16, 2011:'''
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''February 9, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Dani, Martin
 
* Dani - '''Builder bug''':  Theoretically, the builder bug can cause bad binaries shipped from Eclipse.org
 
** But switching the builder now could have other consequences. Most people likely use the 3.6.0 or 3.6.1 builder
 
** Platform uses the 3.6.1 builder. Bug appeared in 3.6.0
 
** McQ thinks we should recommend using the new builder - John: can never know whether a problematic code construct is there or not
 
** Provide a patched version of the 3.6.1 basebuilder as an option for people to use - '''AI John''' ask Kim to re-produce a new basebuilder, then respin RC4
 
* McQ - '''Builds at Eclipse.org'''
 
** IBM Ottawa consolidating 7 offices into 2, plan to not have a build lab
 
** Kim still frustrated with Foundation facilities; McQ talked to people both inside IBM and the Foundation
 
 
 
<hr/>
 
'''February 2, 2011:''' - Canceled (no topics)
 
<hr/>
 
 
'''January 26, 2011:''' - Dani, John, Martin,
 
* Dani: {{bug|330534}} '''ObjectTeams Contribution''' - JDT might allow using their namespace as an exception, couple p2 bugs pending
 
** If the p2 solution cannot be done, OT/J will need to remain off the train
 
* Martin: Concerned about '''Eclipse 3.x quality''', many regressions and not being addressed
 
** {{bug|320329}} ThreadJob#waitForRun can spin when blockingJob is not RUNNING
 
*** '''Platform Runtime: Regression''' introduced in 3.6, can have severe Performance impact, reported 10-Jul, commenters unsure about approach to fix
 
*** A buggy contribution was accepted, and then the contributor left
 
*** John spent a lot of time.. there was a fix that didn't work
 
*** Dani: Could the contribution be pulled out? - No because it's new API (yield())
 
*** Contributor was quite good originally but then just switched teams and was no longer available
 
*** The new testcase from Markus Schorn might help narrowing down the case quickly
 
** {{bug|335153}} Regression: p2 downloads are much slower due to picking remote artifacts even when a local file: URL is available
 
*** '''p2: Regression''' introduced in 3.6, reported 24-Jan, testcase + patch attached, response pending
 
** {{bug|332840}} Wrong error about API change (Regression; works with 3.7M3)
 
*** '''API Tooling: Regression''' introduced in 3.7M4, reported 17-Dec, Olivier:  "I'll take a look" but no response since
 
** {{bug|332838}} Bogus potential null pointer access warning (regression; works with 3.6)
 
*** '''JDT: Regression''' introduced in 3.7M4, reported 17-Dec, Ayushman: "I'll investigate" but no response since
 
** {{bug|332507}} [regression] incomplete build path reported on o.e.rse.subsystem.shells.local
 
*** '''PDE UI: Regression''' introduced in 3.7M4, reported 14-Dec, initial traffic but no followup since 16-Dec
 
** {{bug|335466}} Regression: category.xml processing fails when "name" contains special chars
 
*** Just detected recently
 
** {{bug|313899}} [Progress] Every user-job causes a busy cursor to be shown for a minimum of 250ms
 
*** '''Platform UI''': Patch provided on 21-May, no response whatsoever from Platform UI
 
** John: There had been a fair bit of turnover, new committers getting up to speed ... having less experienced people is a fact
 
*** Identifying key bugs in the big bug database takes a lot of experience
 
** Dani: M5 is the Major feature freeze, so new feature / API work has highest priority ... so quality drop is somewhat expected in M5
 
** Even for regressions... if the regression is less critical than new bugs, it goes behind
 
** '''RESOLUTION:''' Make the important bugs visible to the component leads or PMC. It's natural that we sometimes need to ping on a bug. M5 is a problematic time.
 
* John: {{bug|335374}} '''Redhat 6 as a Reference Platform'''
 
** SWT team doing some final testing, then will put only RH6 on the Ref Platform list
 
* John: '''OpenJDK as a Reference Platform''' - Oracle is interested and might contribute testing
 
 
<hr/>
 
''' January 19, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Jeff, Dani, Martin
 
* Jeff will be unavailable for meeting next 6-7 weeks
 
* John: How do we interpret "under the direction of the PMC" in [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf Eclipse legal process]?
 
** McQ: Not about approval, but about PMC being aware
 
** Jeff: Goal is to indicate "Working with an Eclipse mindset", ie in close collaboration with a committer ... contributor must be aware of IP due diligence guidelines from the beginning of evolution of the code. We want to avoid introducing IP leaks by accepting legacy code that was written before assuming an Eclipse mindset.
 
** McQ: This is about understanding the direction of Eclipse as a whole. Request a PMC +1 on the bug as work is being started. PMC should work with committer to ensure that contributor has been instructed about IP rules.
 
 
<hr/>
 
''' January 12, 2011:''' -
 
 
<hr/>
 
''' January 5, 2011:''' - McQ, John, Dani, Jeff, Martin
 
* Dani: Component Lead progress? - Portal still doesn't have the correct list of components
 
 
<hr/>
 
<hr/>
 +
'''January 8, 2014''' - Dani, Martin, Andrew, John, McQ
 +
* Dani: '''API Freeze''' with M6 on March 7, but JDT cannot put Java 8 stuff in before (March 18) thus will have to ask for an exception
  
 
= Archive =
 
= Archive =
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2013 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2013]]
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2012 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2012]]
 +
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2011 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2011]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2010 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2010]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2010 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2010]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2009 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2009]]
 
* [[Eclipse/PMC/Minutes 2009 | Archive of Meeting Minutes from 2009]]

Revision as of 11:56, 16 April 2014

Documents

Some documents written and/or used by the PMC:

Meeting Schedule

The Eclipse Project PMC has a weekly phone meeting every wednesday at 10.30am EST.

Meeting Minutes

April 16, 2014 - Dani, Alex

  • no topics today

April 9, 2014 - Dani, Martin, Alex

  • Dani - Kepler SR2 and Java 8
    • Planning Council: Can build and host the patches, but messaging must be clear as "SR2 with the patches applied". Still polishing words of the download pages.
    • Not added to aggregate repo ... one-time package without any updates
    • Feature patch available on Marketplace (for manual update) - for those starting from scratch they can now get "Kepler + Patch"
    • Not convinced that the extra downloads were necessary (early adopters already had the patch, new adopters can also get Luna) ... but current approach won't hurt.
  • John - Hard to review all incoming Platform/UI Contributions
    • Dani tried to jump in on some issues like Icons
    • Doubt that some of the work will really help bringing committers on board (such as the for loop conversion)
    • Some of the initial contributors of very simple things have now grown into contributing real interesting things
    • Getting more people involved in initial reviews (currently some 10 active committers, 4-5 fullday ones) - but mainly Eric and Paul review patches

April 2, 2014 - Dani, Alex, John, Martin

  • Dani - new GTK3+ issues
    • crash/hang when SWT AWT bridge is used, also affects JavaFX (bug 431330)
    • problems with main menu (bug 419830)
  • Dani - Submitting the IP Log for the Java 8 Work
    • Currently not qualified as a "release", only submitting the IP log.
  • Dani - need to approve API changes for Java 8 in M7
    • No API changes, only additions
    • Used / tested by JDT Core / JDT UI
    • ObjectTeams (Stephan Herrmann) was involved
    • There were no objections i.e. changes were approved
  • John - SWT over JavaFX
    • EclipseCon: Steve Northover thought it was possible, just a lot of work
    • Decide after Luna whether hosting in SWT or doing as a separate project
    • Relationship to Tom Schindl's e(fx)clipse project ?
      • e(fx)clipse is more about tooling, not so much about rendering ...
      • Tom seems to have an alpha version, but not actively working on it
      • Seem to need some additional API in SWT - patch sits in Gerrit with nobody putting any attention at the moment. Details in bug 426243
      • Having this API in place would make the JavaFX port simpler
        • It look good but Alex has no idea whether it's the best idea and how acceptable on all platforms
        • John: May make sense in the next release, API can't be a near-term thing ... needs some backers who can invest significant time in it
      • Doug Schaefer is also pushing for JavaFX



March 26, 2014 - John, Dani, Martin, Alex

  • John - EclipseCon Update
    • Slightly smaller than in the past, but VERY of positive attitude, LOT of excitement around Java 8 ... Oracle turned on the servers during one of the morning sessions
    • IoT / M2M - lots of demos on Raspberry Pi, many new projects
    • Very good content around Orion and Javascript, but a small crowd
    • Great opening keynote from Mike Milinkovich on the history and future of Eclipse - mentioned Flux
    • See also Blog Posts from Doug Schaefer and Ian Bull as well as top 5 from Ian
  • John - ARM port of GTK - any tracking items ?
    • Bug exists for Launchers on ARM64 ; several other items too
    • IBM PPC Little Endian port of SWT
    • Test on less used architectures like Solaris? - similar to the Windows 8 case...
    • Donating RHEL subscriptions to the Foundation was not accepted - John: Bug is open for having Hudson slaves run on other architectures
      • Example: bug 430698, bug 429237, bug 415757; bug 419855 talks about running virtualbox images on a vserver
      • Denis is investigating some way running Hudson / HIPP instances on other hardware ... GTK3, Windows etc tests need other hardware
      • Check for cost of hardware, companies to donate it, and people to maintain it (Security patches!)
        • Alex could imagine RH signing up for some maintenance ... test machines could be entirely outside Eclipse.org infrastructure, isolated as their own sandbox
        • Hudson needs access though, thus need to be careful about security
  • Alex - Java 8 vs Java 7 currently can't build an Eclipse SDK when the build machine has only one of the JDK's
    • In the past, it was possible to build with only Java 7 ... now, if I have Java 8 I cannot build (need Java 7 too)
    • ==> Update on March 27 by Dani: this is bug 390889 and we'll try to fix it for M7.

March 19, 2014 - Dani, Alex, Martin, McQ

  • McQ - Congrats on Java 8 Release to coincide with the Oracle release
  • Dani - Windows 8 Support - any answer to John's E-Mail ?
    • McQ struggles with calling it a supported platform when nobody tests it; all we need to make sure is that somebody uses it
    • Send note to Wayne, the epp-dev list and cross-project
    • Make it clear that running on Win8 is a useful contribution ... and we WON't put Win8 on supported platforms list if we don't get that confirmation

March 12, 2014 - Alex, Martin, McQ, John

  • GTK - SWT team discussions
  • John - preparing for Java 8 release

March 5, 2014 - John, Dani, Martin, Alex

  • Dani: How to Avoid Spam in Gerrit - Bug in Bugzilla PMC bucket - consider offline
  • Dani: Windows 8 Support
    • Not listed in official plan
    • No technical problem, but lack of resources - only 1 machine on the IBM team and that's a VM
    • Add as supported Platform for Luna, or wait another year ?
    • Most active development is on Linux and Windows 7 these days... agree with Dani that only active developer use helps finding real issues
    • AI John: Send a note to eclipse-dev
      • Reaching out to Community to find an active user would be sufficient ... WPF or Win32 ? WPF is only a runtime target environment as of today.
  • Dani: State of GTK 3+
    • Not yet fixed on Eclipse side, but GTK found a bug on their side that is going to be fixed; not yet sure though if that will fix everything
    • Launcher now has a fallback to GTK2 if it detects the partially supported GTK3 version
    • Good collaboration after an initial warm-up phase ... Eclipse SWT considered an important-enough client to make fixes for
    • Alex: Concerned about users with a GTK 3.8 distro that update to GTK 3.10 and get the fallback to GTK 2 activated which has crashes with autocomplete in the browser
    • On GTK 3.9 or newer, Launcher falls back to GTK 2 but that port is pretty much unmaintained, several other problems in there ... but not falling back is even worse
    • Should be fine once distros start picking up paint / clipping issue fix (the not-drawing fix is still pending on SWT side)
  • Alex: GTK 3 in Mars
    • Bump minimum required version to only use cairo and get rid of older calls - this causes confusion with GTK folk
    • RHEL 5 would no longer work
    • Thanks to SWT now requiring Java 1.5, can simplify the code wrt JNI

February 26, 2014 - Alex, John, Martin, McQ

  • John: Orion Release this week
  • Alex: Eclipse on ARM64
    • Launcher and swt at first
    • Had ports for other architectures in source form in the past, risk to get stale but helps getting the ball rolling
    • John: Quite a lot steps to make a new Platform real - constants in OSGi, ... - but can happen piecemeal eg only do SWT first
      • Martin: Would make sense to document the required steps for adding a new Platform while doing the job
      • At least, write up the TODO list - in order to make it easier the next time
    • Should ask Tom Watson about OSGi constants
  • Dani: Update on GTK 3+ issue - bug filed against GTK, working on a workaround for fallback but not yet finished
    • Alex: Fix in GTK3 alone wouldn't work because SWT overrides GTK in that part
    • McQ: If SWT API can't be implemented on top of new GTK API any more, discussion needs to happen
      • If SWT does something wrong, would need pointers to what they should be doing instead...
      • Maybe a couple phone calls to talk through the technical details
      • Don't fight over things ... figure out what's the right thing to do, and just do it



February 19, 2014 - Dani, Alex, Martin, John

  • Dani: Silenio to work on GTK issue?
  • John: GTK testing at the Eclipse Foundation
  • John: e4 ML discussion about graduating some tools
    • Model Editor, CSS Editor, CSS Spy, ...
    • Fairly late, but risk is rather low -- suggest putting into PDE
    • Dani concerns: No PDE committers available for handholding - and stuff is not polished; even Lars sees it in Luna+1
    • John: These tools would only be used by people building RCP apps
    • Martin: What is the goal of trying to graduate?
      • If it's just about getting more exposure, perhaps keep in incubation and add to the RCP EPP Package ?
    • Alex would like adding new people / interested contributors to PDE

February 5, 2014 - McQ, Dani, Martin, Alex

  • Dani: Confcall Numbers: Skype into the US tollfree; Alex use SIP
  • Martin: Eclipse 4 vs Eclipse 3.x - will file defects
  • Alex: Testing on modern Linux

January 22, 2014 - John, Dani, Alex, Martin

  • John, Alex: New GTK 3.10 breaking Eclipse on latest Fedora
    • Alex been looking at Browser
    • Some Views not showing up - Silenio just back yesterday
    • Dani: For 4.4m5 and 4.3.2, will document issues in the README
      • Considered a fallback to "gtk2" support in the Launcher, but that was considered too risky
      • Silenio might have a workaround ... OK if the new code can be added conditionally for GTK 3.10 only
  • Dani: M5 Status
    • Still many open bugs not triaged - component leads should triage earlier

January 15, 2014 - McQ, Andrew, Dani, Martin

  • Dani: Lakshmi (SWT Team) going on maternity leave - SWT still a decent team of 4
  • Andrew: PMC Participation - Suggestion

January 8, 2014 - Dani, Martin, Andrew, John, McQ

  • Dani: API Freeze with M6 on March 7, but JDT cannot put Java 8 stuff in before (March 18) thus will have to ask for an exception

Archive

Back to the top