Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Eclipse/PMC"

(Meeting Minutes)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
** move reference platform to Sun 6u11
 
** move reference platform to Sun 6u11
 
*** problem(?): Sun added 3 new items added that are licensed LGPL or GPL
 
*** problem(?): Sun added 3 new items added that are licensed LGPL or GPL
*** Martin to add comment to bug to identify this issue
+
*** [[Image:Ok_green.gif]] Martin added comment to {{bug|261724}} to identify this issue
 
* ICU 4.0
 
* ICU 4.0
 
** we will stay with 4.0
 
** we will stay with 4.0
 
* Deprecation Policy
 
* Deprecation Policy
** still under discussion
+
** still under discussion, {{bug|261544}}
 
* Use of internal provisional  
 
* Use of internal provisional  
** seems to be some consensus about *not* requiring this
+
** seems to be some consensus about *not* requiring this, {{bug|261874}}
 
* JDT co-leadership
 
* JDT co-leadership
 
** what is the process?
 
** what is the process?
Line 33: Line 33:
 
** Java6 on Solaris
 
** Java6 on Solaris
 
*** Martin's company would like to support this
 
*** Martin's company would like to support this
 +
*** [[Image:Ok_green.gif]] filed {{bug|262907}} to discuss process and practices around reference platforms
  
 
'''Jan 21:'''
 
'''Jan 21:'''

Revision as of 12:18, 29 January 2009

Meeting Schedule

The Eclipse Project PMC has a weekly phone meeting every wednesday at 10.30am EST.

Meeting Minutes

Jan 28:

  • Java 6
    • move reference platform to Sun 6u11
      • problem(?): Sun added 3 new items added that are licensed LGPL or GPL
      • Ok green.gif Martin added comment to bug 261724 to identify this issue
  • ICU 4.0
    • we will stay with 4.0
  • Deprecation Policy
  • Use of internal provisional
    • seems to be some consensus about *not* requiring this, bug 261874
  • JDT co-leadership
    • what is the process?
      • Jeff: vote in community; then propose to the PMC
      • Would like to get Dani Meghert involved.
      • Philippe will check development process documents
  • Cocoa port
    • Looking good
    • Taking early access off and making it the "first" choice for Mac downloads
  • Milestone progress / 3.4.2
    • Need to discuss M5 in arch call (should have done this last week)
    • Should always remind the team in the arch call of upcoming deadlines
    • Performance issues that need API to fix have to happen by M6
      • Teams should understand performance results (will be discussed in a couple of weeks)
  • Re: Reference Platforms
    • Java6 on Solaris
      • Martin's company would like to support this
      • Ok green.gif filed bug 262907 to discuss process and practices around reference platforms

Jan 21:

  • How should we track meeting minutes topic - Wiki
  • Provisional API conventions - Jeff working on bug 261874 for discussion at the AC
    • should there be a tag in the Javadoc (ie. "experimental")?
    • Jeff wants to keep the concerns "conventions" vs "Javadoc" separate
    • Jeff, "... Javadoc should not be generated for provisional ..."
    • Martin disagrees, "... need feedback and discussion for new API ..."
  • What is the role of the PMC lead?
    • global view of components/processes
    • organize architecture call, ensure we are on track
    • spark conversations (ie. M5 is feature freeze)
  • Reference platforms
    • we should choose JDK1.6, "update 11" rather than "update 4"
    • around "RC time", solidify the reference platform (it is the one we are testing on)

Jan 14:

  • PMC component ownership x bugzilla pmc authorization

Back to the top