Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "EMIWG/MembersCall-24-Mar-2010"

m
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 
Ken:  Pulsar is solving a too "high level" problem, common code is not used enough.  Pulsar should be more of a "portal"
 
Ken:  Pulsar is solving a too "high level" problem, common code is not used enough.  Pulsar should be more of a "portal"
 +
 +
EricC: Who creates a product?:  RIM, not strongly branded bundled, and includes a update site.  Motodev Studio, installer & update site, Nokia: similar, branded tool.
 +
 +
= Driving Commonality =
 +
 +
what would member companies want from Pulsar
 +
 +
Nokia:  Interest in MTJ (for S40) and Native Symbian development. Also discussons with Meego.
 +
* interest in Native, C++ development:
 +
** Project Build (signing, multiple targets),
 +
** Discovery of devices (over BT, USB, wifi, etc),
 +
** Publishing to developer portals
 +
** tooling around Meego
 +
 +
* MTJ
 +
** MIDP 3 support, which would include CDC support
 +
 +
Symbian Foundation:
 +
* Native - similar to Nokia.
 +
 +
* Web Tooling
 +
** Symbian is looking to fund development of a Web Development environment

Revision as of 13:50, 24 March 2010

Shortcuts
Home
Meetings
Mail Archive
Edit this menu

Face to Face meeting at EclipseCon 2010

Attendees

  • Motorola (Christian Kurzke, Eric Cloninger, Ruth, Daniel Franco, Guilherme)
  • Nokia (Ronnie King, Gorkem (lead ERCP), Warren Paul)
  • RIM (Adam Abramski, Jon Dearden, Ken Wallis)
  • Symbian (Paul Beusterien)
  • Eclipse Foundation (Ian, Doug Schaeffer)


Project representatives:

  • MTJ: Christian Kurzke
  • Sequoyah: Eric Cloninger
  • CDT: Doug Schaeffer
  • ERCP: Gorkem

Agenda

Roll Call and Review of the Agenda (5 Minutes)

Pulsar review of scope

In the 2009 review, we had 3 main topics: MTJ, CDT and WebTooling, from which we accomplished the MTJ package.

Due to significant changes in the mobile landscape, we should refocus. maybe:

  • Java (incl. J2ME, RIM, Android)
  • Native (Symbian, Android Native, Meego?)
  • Web (Symbian Web UI, etc.)

Ronnie: Should we maintain the focus of Pulsar on a "product".

DougS: proposed a new "mobile" Platform focused plugin fest.

John D: What is our long-term goal, are we creating products or frameworks.

Ian: Successful example: Eclipse "Team Provider" Framework

Ken: Pulsar is solving a too "high level" problem, common code is not used enough. Pulsar should be more of a "portal"

EricC: Who creates a product?: RIM, not strongly branded bundled, and includes a update site. Motodev Studio, installer & update site, Nokia: similar, branded tool.

Driving Commonality

what would member companies want from Pulsar

Nokia: Interest in MTJ (for S40) and Native Symbian development. Also discussons with Meego.

  • interest in Native, C++ development:
    • Project Build (signing, multiple targets),
    • Discovery of devices (over BT, USB, wifi, etc),
    • Publishing to developer portals
    • tooling around Meego
  • MTJ
    • MIDP 3 support, which would include CDC support

Symbian Foundation:

  • Native - similar to Nokia.
  • Web Tooling
    • Symbian is looking to fund development of a Web Development environment

Back to the top