Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "EMIWG/MembersCall-22-Apr-2010"
< EMIWG
(→Eclipse for Mobile Web) |
(→Eclipse for Mobile Java) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
=== Eclipse for Mobile Java === | === Eclipse for Mobile Java === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Comment : The build support, project, and project nature support are not the same in this area. Would need to be consolidated, or merged? | ||
| + | * Comment : Pre-processing was not on the list | ||
| + | * Overall, no concerns | ||
=== Eclipse for Mobile Native === | === Eclipse for Mobile Native === | ||
Revision as of 09:41, 6 May 2010
Contents
Conference Call
Attendees
- Ian Skerrett - Eclipse Foundation
- Craig Setera
- Paul Beusterien - Symbian Foundation
- Daniel Pastore - Eldorado
- Ruth Soliani - Eldorado
- Jon Dearden - RIMM
- Ken Wallis - RIMM
- Mark Rogalski - RIMM
- Gorkem Ercan - Nokia
- Ronnie King - Nokia
Project representatives:
- Doug Scheafer - CDT
- Eric Cloninger - Sequoyah
Agenda
Roll Call and Review of the Agenda (5 Minutes)
- Question : Is Sequoyah the main vehicle project for Pulsar?
- Item : Eric - build chain is different, but mostly Java
Review of Pulsar Architecture Proposal Feedback
Common Architecture
- No concerns raised from the group
Eclipse for Mobile Web
- Question : Jon - How does the Symbian Foundation proposal compare to the W3C?
Eclipse for Mobile Java
- Comment : The build support, project, and project nature support are not the same in this area. Would need to be consolidated, or merged?
- Comment : Pre-processing was not on the list
- Overall, no concerns
Eclipse for Mobile Native
Symbian Foudation Web Tools Proposal