Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "EMIWG/MembersCall-22-Apr-2010"

(Eclipse for Mobile Web)
(Eclipse for Mobile Java)
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
=== Eclipse for Mobile Java ===
 
=== Eclipse for Mobile Java ===
 +
 +
* Comment : The build support, project, and project nature support are not the same in this area. Would need to be consolidated, or merged?
 +
* Comment : Pre-processing was not on the list
 +
* Overall, no concerns
  
 
=== Eclipse for Mobile Native ===
 
=== Eclipse for Mobile Native ===

Revision as of 08:41, 6 May 2010

Conference Call

Attendees

  • Ian Skerrett - Eclipse Foundation
  • Craig Setera
  • Paul Beusterien - Symbian Foundation
  • Daniel Pastore - Eldorado
  • Ruth Soliani - Eldorado
  • Jon Dearden - RIMM
  • Ken Wallis - RIMM
  • Mark Rogalski - RIMM
  • Gorkem Ercan - Nokia
  • Ronnie King - Nokia


Project representatives:

  • Doug Scheafer - CDT
  • Eric Cloninger - Sequoyah

Agenda

Roll Call and Review of the Agenda (5 Minutes)

  • Question : Is Sequoyah the main vehicle project for Pulsar?
  • Item : Eric - build chain is different, but mostly Java

Review of Pulsar Architecture Proposal Feedback

Common Architecture

  • No concerns raised from the group

Eclipse for Mobile Web

  • Question : Jon - How does the Symbian Foundation proposal compare to the W3C?

Eclipse for Mobile Java

  • Comment : The build support, project, and project nature support are not the same in this area. Would need to be consolidated, or merged?
  • Comment : Pre-processing was not on the list
  • Overall, no concerns

Eclipse for Mobile Native

Symbian Foudation Web Tools Proposal


Helios Release

Sequoyah Status

MTJ Status

Back to the top