Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "EMF/EMF 2.3/Plan History"
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | An abridged history of the [http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/docs/dev-plans/emf_project_plan_2.3.html EMF 2.3 Plan] and the adoption of JDK 5.0: | |
− | :* [http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg13791.html People are asking for support for Java 5] | + | :* 2005-12-13 [http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg13791.html People are asking for support for Java 5] (eclipse.tools.emf newsgroup; Eclipse 3.2 / EMF 2.2 timeframe) |
− | :* [http:// | + | |
− | :* [http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg20271.html Early announcement re: plan for 2.3M4] | + | :* 2006-06-28 [http://www.eclipse.org/org/councils/20060628ACMinutes.php Architecture Council Minutes] (website; ''"All projects should have a statement in their project plan about their position on [[:Category:Java | 1.5]]."'') |
− | :* [[EMF 2.3 Adoption]] | + | |
− | :* [http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/docs/#whatsnew What's New] | + | :* 2006-06-29 [http://www.eclipse.org/org/councils/20060629PCMinutes.php Planning Council Minutes] (website; ''"There was a discussion of which JVM to use for Europa. Because running Europa will require running with the highest level JVM of all the plug-ins, running all of Europa is almost certainly going to need JVM 1.5."'') |
− | :* [http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg20750.html Second announcement re: 2.3M4] | + | |
− | :* [[EMF 2.3 Generics]] - | + | :* 2006-06-30 [http://www.eclipse.org/callisto/ Eclipse 3.2 / EMF 2.2 / Callisto released] |
− | :* [[EMF 2.3 JVM Requirements]] - | + | |
− | :* [[EMF 2.3 New and Noteworthy]] | + | :* 2006-07-20 [http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/docs/#plandocs EMF 2.3 Project Plan] (website; later renamed from [http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/www/modeling/emf/docs/dev-plans/emf_project_plan_3.0.html?hideattic=0&root=Eclipse_Website&view=log 3.0] to [http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/www/modeling/emf/docs/dev-plans/emf_project_plan_2.3.html?hideattic=0&root=Eclipse_Website&view=log 2.3] on 2006-12-12) |
− | :* [http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/downloads/?project=emf EMF 2.3 released] | + | |
− | :* [[EMF 2.3 Migration Guide]] | + | :* 2006-07-27 [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg00566.html WTP states its Europa contribution (WTP 2.0) will prereq JDK 5.0] (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org) |
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-10-05 [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg00676.html Ed explains why we switched from EMF 3.0 to 2.3] (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-10-06 [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg00681.html Jeff clarifies what EMF moving to JDK 5 means for BIRT] (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-10-12 [http://www.eclipse.org/org/councils/20061012ACMinutes.php Architecture Council Minutes] (website) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-11-07 [http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg20271.html Early announcement re: plan for 2.3M4] (eclipse.tools.emf newsgroup) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-11-09 [[EMF 2.3 Adoption]] (wiki) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-11-18 [http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/docs/#whatsnew What's New] (linked on EMF homepage, news page, docs page, downloads page) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-12-01 [http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg20750.html Second announcement re: 2.3M4] (eclipse.tools.emf newsgroup) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2006-12-07 [[EMF 2.3 Generics]] (wiki, linked from EMF docs page & EMF downloads page "Bleeding Edge") | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-01-03 [[Europa_Minutes_2007.01.03#TPTP.2C_EMF.2C_and_Java_5 | Europa Meeting Minutes]] (wiki; ''"It should not be a surprise that EMF 2.3 requires Java 5."'') | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-01-07 [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-planning-council/msg00300.html Bjorn states confusion how the process broke down] (eclipse.org-planning-council@eclipse.org; ''"the EMF team clearly brought this JVM 4/5 issue forward over seven months ago so why is it suddenly a surprise and a blocking issue for Europa?"'') | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-01-07 [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-planning-council/msg00301.html Harm discusses EMF 2.3 and Java 5] (eclipse.org-planning-council@eclipse.org) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-01-08 [[EMF 2.3 JVM Requirements]] (wiki, linked from EMF docs page & EMF downloads page "Bleeding Edge") | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-01-23 [http://www.eclipse.org/org/councils/20070123PCMinutes.php Planning Council Minutes] (website; ''"Add a link to the Europa page [...] discussing the EMF 2.2/2.3 features and JVM 1.4/1.5 issues and what the consequences of whether one should use EMF 2.2 or 2.3 - [[http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/EMF_2.3_JVM_Requirements#Runtime_.2F_Compilation_Compatibility | here is the link]]"'') | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-03-04 [[Europa_Minutes_2007.03.04#Europa_on_1.4_versus_5 | Europa Meeting Minutes]] (wiki) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-04-26 [[EMF 2.3 New and Noteworthy]] (wiki, linked from EMF docs page) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-06-28 [http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/downloads/?project=emf EMF 2.3 released] (EMF downloads page) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* 2007-07-16 [[EMF 2.3 Migration Guide]] (wiki, linked from EMF docs page) | ||
[[Category:EMF]] | [[Category:EMF]] |
Revision as of 18:20, 5 October 2007
An abridged history of the EMF 2.3 Plan and the adoption of JDK 5.0:
- 2005-12-13 People are asking for support for Java 5 (eclipse.tools.emf newsgroup; Eclipse 3.2 / EMF 2.2 timeframe)
- 2006-06-28 Architecture Council Minutes (website; "All projects should have a statement in their project plan about their position on 1.5.")
- 2006-06-29 Planning Council Minutes (website; "There was a discussion of which JVM to use for Europa. Because running Europa will require running with the highest level JVM of all the plug-ins, running all of Europa is almost certainly going to need JVM 1.5.")
- 2006-06-30 Eclipse 3.2 / EMF 2.2 / Callisto released
- 2006-07-20 EMF 2.3 Project Plan (website; later renamed from 3.0 to 2.3 on 2006-12-12)
- 2006-07-27 WTP states its Europa contribution (WTP 2.0) will prereq JDK 5.0 (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org)
- 2006-10-05 Ed explains why we switched from EMF 3.0 to 2.3 (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org)
- 2006-10-06 Jeff clarifies what EMF moving to JDK 5 means for BIRT (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org)
- 2006-10-12 Architecture Council Minutes (website)
- 2006-11-07 Early announcement re: plan for 2.3M4 (eclipse.tools.emf newsgroup)
- 2006-11-09 EMF 2.3 Adoption (wiki)
- 2006-11-18 What's New (linked on EMF homepage, news page, docs page, downloads page)
- 2006-12-01 Second announcement re: 2.3M4 (eclipse.tools.emf newsgroup)
- 2006-12-07 EMF 2.3 Generics (wiki, linked from EMF docs page & EMF downloads page "Bleeding Edge")
- 2007-01-03 Europa Meeting Minutes (wiki; "It should not be a surprise that EMF 2.3 requires Java 5.")
- 2007-01-07 Bjorn states confusion how the process broke down (eclipse.org-planning-council@eclipse.org; "the EMF team clearly brought this JVM 4/5 issue forward over seven months ago so why is it suddenly a surprise and a blocking issue for Europa?")
- 2007-01-07 Harm discusses EMF 2.3 and Java 5 (eclipse.org-planning-council@eclipse.org)
- 2007-01-08 EMF 2.3 JVM Requirements (wiki, linked from EMF docs page & EMF downloads page "Bleeding Edge")
- 2007-01-23 Planning Council Minutes (website; "Add a link to the Europa page [...] discussing the EMF 2.2/2.3 features and JVM 1.4/1.5 issues and what the consequences of whether one should use EMF 2.2 or 2.3 - [| here is the link]")
- 2007-03-04 Europa Meeting Minutes (wiki)
- 2007-04-26 EMF 2.3 New and Noteworthy (wiki, linked from EMF docs page)
- 2007-06-28 EMF 2.3 released (EMF downloads page)
- 2007-07-16 EMF 2.3 Migration Guide (wiki, linked from EMF docs page)