Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "E4/Meeting Minutes/Status 20130905"

(Minutes)
(Minutes)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* Jface generics
 
* Jface generics
 
** work has moved into a branch
 
** work has moved into a branch
** need to ensure we have at least a functionally complete subset generified, and at least some concrete viewers ported over to validate the approach
+
** need to ensure we have a functionally complete subset generified, and at least some concrete viewers ported over to validate the approach
 
** Aiming for completion in M3
 
** Aiming for completion in M3
 
* Forking JFace
 
* Forking JFace

Revision as of 10:52, 5 September 2013

Attendees

  • Brian
  • Dani
  • Daniel
  • Paul
  • John

Minutes

  • We are done with Kepler SR1
  • Respin was needed last night due to build problems
  • Revisiting window rendering workflow to simplify it
  • Looking at recent report of performance problem in CTabFolder in app with large number of tabs
  • Touching bundles to fix inner jar signing problems - need to make sure we sign what we used to sign
  • Investigating replacement of SAC CSS parser with different parsers
  • Working on enabling use of some IDE views like navigator in an e4 RCP app
  • Jface generics
    • work has moved into a branch
    • need to ensure we have a functionally complete subset generified, and at least some concrete viewers ported over to validate the approach
    • Aiming for completion in M3
  • Forking JFace
    • Could enable other kinds of investigation
    • Would be hard to co-exist and adopt
    • Not clear if it is needed for generics alone
    • JFace already makes fairly extensive use of collection-based methods alongside array-based methods