Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Development Process 2006 Revision Comments"
(→Requirements 1) |
(→Structure and Organization 2) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
You all are right - I don't know what I was thinking. Let's go with '''''R'''''equirements and '''''G'''''uidelines. ''--Bjorn Freeman-Benson'' | You all are right - I don't know what I was thinking. Let's go with '''''R'''''equirements and '''''G'''''uidelines. ''--Bjorn Freeman-Benson'' | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Structure and Organization 2==== | ||
+ | <div style="border: 2px solid #8E87EB; padding: 6px;">The comments below suggest adding a hyperlink. I took their advice . ''--Bjorn Freeman-Benson''</div> | ||
+ | <div style="border: 2px solid #8E87EB; padding: 6px;"> Add a hyperlink to Bylaws section VII. ''-- Anurag Gupta''</div> | ||
+ | <div style="border: 2px solid #8E87EB; padding: 6px;"> | ||
+ | Unfortunately, the Bylaws is a PDF file, so the best I can do (and have now done) is a link to the Bylaws. You'll have to get to section VII yourself. ''--Bjorn Freeman-Benson''</div> | ||
+ | <div style="border: 2px solid #8E87EB; padding: 6px;"> | ||
+ | Hey, Bjorn... Let me teach an old dog a new trick! ''--Rich Main''</div> | ||
+ | <div style="border: 2px solid #8E87EB; padding: 6px;">Thanks, Rich, I didn't know that worked. ''-- Bjorn Freeman-Benson'' | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====(add next comment here)==== |
Revision as of 15:59, 27 October 2006
Contents
Purpose of This Page
The Development Process 2006 Revision page was becoming a little difficult to read with conversations and old comments interspersed with the text, thus I moved some of the old comments here while leaving a summary on the main page.
At the same time, I suggest that comments that conversations be done on the eclipse.foundation newsgroup, again with a summary placed into the wiki.
Requirements 1
I agree with Ed and Anurag: the difference between "Recommended" and "Suggested" isn't obvious and using "M" for "Recommended" isn't descriptive. --Dani 09:17, 13 October 2006 (EDT)
How about Mandatory, Strongly Recommended / Suggested, Complementary, or else Must Do, Should Do, Could Do? --nickb 14:07, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
You all are right - I don't know what I was thinking. Let's go with Requirements and Guidelines. --Bjorn Freeman-Benson