Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Debug/Phone 2-Aug-2012"

m (Agenda and Minutes)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
*IBM  
 
*IBM  
 
** Dani
 
** Dani
 +
** Curtis
 +
* Wind River
 +
** Pawel
 +
* Self
 +
** JD
  
 
== Agenda and Minutes  ==
 
== Agenda and Minutes  ==
 
* Status
 
* Status
 +
** Pawel: TCF project work and proprietary Wind River debugger work
 +
** Dani:
 +
** Curtis:
 
* Kepler Planning
 
* Kepler Planning
* Console view
+
** Pawel: improving multi-core debugging.
 +
*** Embed breadcrumb in variables views.
 +
*** Customising debug view organisation further.
 +
** Mike: investigate replacing evaluation engine.  Likely that research will go into a dead end.
 +
** Dani: Java 8 - new ast nodes that will require changes to evaluation engine. 
 +
** Dani: synchronization issues in process console, plus other small issues to be addressed.
 +
* Console view  
 +
** JD:Are there any use-cases for the console outside of the workbench.
 +
*** Not known.
 +
** JD: would like to re-architecture the console to be an event-driven design instead of listener based.
 +
** Dani: we are very constrained in terms of resources, so we're not sure if we'll be able to review a large patch.
 +
** Pawel: one option is to have a new console that lives in parallel to the existing one.
 +
** Curtis: please look at bugs to see what the community requested to have implemented.
  
 
== Actions ==
 
== Actions ==

Latest revision as of 11:21, 2 August 2012

Call Info

Debug/Meeting Notes#Call_Info

Attendees

  • IBM
    • Dani
    • Curtis
  • Wind River
    • Pawel
  • Self
    • JD

Agenda and Minutes

  • Status
    • Pawel: TCF project work and proprietary Wind River debugger work
    • Dani:
    • Curtis:
  • Kepler Planning
    • Pawel: improving multi-core debugging.
      • Embed breadcrumb in variables views.
      • Customising debug view organisation further.
    • Mike: investigate replacing evaluation engine. Likely that research will go into a dead end.
    • Dani: Java 8 - new ast nodes that will require changes to evaluation engine.
    • Dani: synchronization issues in process console, plus other small issues to be addressed.
  • Console view
    • JD:Are there any use-cases for the console outside of the workbench.
      • Not known.
    • JD: would like to re-architecture the console to be an event-driven design instead of listener based.
    • Dani: we are very constrained in terms of resources, so we're not sure if we'll be able to review a large patch.
    • Pawel: one option is to have a new console that lives in parallel to the existing one.
    • Curtis: please look at bugs to see what the community requested to have implemented.

Actions