Difference between revisions of "Dash Project/Commits Explorer"

From Eclipsepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Here we are collecting information about incorrect or mis-classified commits reported by the explorer.
 
Here we are collecting information about incorrect or mis-classified commits reported by the explorer.
  
* Some user names were changed when OTI joined IBM. Commits by the old login should be classified under the new. The foundation db should record these substitutions.
+
* Some user names were changed when OTI joined IBM. Commits by the old login should be classified under the new. These old logins are categorized as "unknown".
 +
* People who have changed companies are being reported as having worked for their current company for all of history rather than as having worked for company A until 2005 and then company B.
 +
* People categorized under "individual" may be associated with a company, just not an Eclipse member company that has signed a Member Committer Agreement.
 
* Project websites under /cvsroot/org.eclipse are not included, but should be.
 
* Project websites under /cvsroot/org.eclipse are not included, but should be.

Revision as of 10:19, 23 May 2006

Read about the commits explorer on our blog: http://eclipse-projects.blogspot.com/ (to appear soon)


Here we are collecting information about incorrect or mis-classified commits reported by the explorer.

  • Some user names were changed when OTI joined IBM. Commits by the old login should be classified under the new. These old logins are categorized as "unknown".
  • People who have changed companies are being reported as having worked for their current company for all of history rather than as having worked for company A until 2005 and then company B.
  • People categorized under "individual" may be associated with a company, just not an Eclipse member company that has signed a Member Committer Agreement.
  • Project websites under /cvsroot/org.eclipse are not included, but should be.