Difference between revisions of "Dali R1.0 Planning meetings - Monday"

Latest revision as of 13:46, 20 July 2006

Attendees: Brian Vosburgh(Oracle), Shaun Smith(Oracle), Paul Fullbright(Oracle), Tran Le(Oracle), Karen Moore(Oracle), Neil Hauge(Oracle), Leonard Theivendra(IBM), David Williams(IBM), Chuck Brigham(IBM),

9:30AM - Review processes and WTP process adoption

• 0.5 Review
  • Milestone plan up front
• Iterations
  • Longer milestones
  • Iteration Planning meeting
• Changes going forward
  • Better bugzilla maintenance – enter features at beginning of iteration, target them, and close them at the end. Every one is responsible for doing this.
  • Go back to 15 min meetings – rotating facilitator
  • Better use of the dev mailing list
• WTP Processes
  • Align with Milestones, voice on the plan
  • Working with Ibuilds
  • Stay plugged into req’s planning
  • CVS move
  • Package rename
  • Bugzilla
• Bundle source

Notes:

• Technical Debt Discussion

Wish List

• JDT Annotation support (enhancements) – Write up specific use cases, bring list to the PMC.

10:45AM - Define vision and scope for R1.0

• Probably makes more sense to have next Dali release in June of next year, for better Eclipse alignment, more features, less release headaches
• Perhaps have a Major Milestone planned for December or January as a mid point. (.7’ish)
• Keep internal versioning
• December
  • Orm.xml support
  • persistence.xml editing
  • persistence.xml auto-synch (depends on facets)
  • annotation completion
  • quick fixes/text markers
  • basic automap
  • Platform integration reqs
    • Facets
    • APT?
  • DTP migration
  • Define adopter requirements, work on features necessary for adoption
  • Model
    • Model awareness/notification issues (bug 141531)
    • Model Build (incremental – dependency build)
    • Move to validator for ORM problems.
  • Priority annotations (adopter related, high use)
  • Need to determine how we are going to define provider jars on 1.4 compliant servers
• June
  • Merged persistence view
  • Map to binary classes
  • Query Builder?
    • Perhaps use runtime libraries to validate queries

DDL Gen??

• Headless use of DDL Gen

1:00PM - Define vision and scope for R1.0 - Continued - (This will involve UI design, end user experience, etc)

• ORM XML annotation overrides
  • Define vision for UI
• Persistence Unit
  • 1 per project
• Persistence runtime library/provider will provide classpath configuration and provider specific functionality (generation, query validation, etc)
• Need to define a server runtime that is a JPA provider (will look like a server). Will make sense to have a non server “server” (provider).
• Question: Can we have a Server defined that has additional capabilities (nested server/provider/installation)

New feature: Map to a jar of classes with orm.xml

Deployment View (Merged View)

• Use Common Navigator to show high level merge view
• Merge view should go down to the persistent attribute level, should match the outline view detail, since the properties view is the same.
• Read Only Properties view to show merged content

Other notes:

• Java has to know about XML for visual cue in the source
• Warning when you have configured an annotation and the XML has already been configured