Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Dali Project/Weekly Meeting/December 04 2009"
(→Attendees) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Attendees=== | ===Attendees=== | ||
− | * Neil | + | * Neil |
− | + | * Brian | |
+ | * Karen | ||
+ | * Shaun | ||
+ | * Tran | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
===New Topics=== | ===New Topics=== | ||
*Should JPA 2.0 be enabled for Java 1.5 facet? | *Should JPA 2.0 be enabled for Java 1.5 facet? | ||
+ | **Metamodel @Generated is a problem in this case, otherwise running in 1.5 shouldn't be a problem. | ||
+ | **(Shaun) should just not use @Generated in 1.5 faceted projects, only use in 1.6 - would need to change logic to recognize metamodel without relying on @Generated annotation | ||
+ | **(Neil) we should try to support this case unless we determine some technical reason or functional reason why we cannot. Appears to be doable. | ||
*What should the preselected Facet configuration be (JPA1.0 or JPA2.0 or calculated(if that is even possible))? | *What should the preselected Facet configuration be (JPA1.0 or JPA2.0 or calculated(if that is even possible))? | ||
+ | **(Shaun) Not completely obvious. Shaun will go back and do some research, but lets default to JEE 6 JPA 2.0 JDK 1.6 for now. | ||
+ | **(Shaun) we could also add configuration for JPA 2.0 w/ Java 1.5 and 1.6, | ||
*Can we need to remove the Utility Facet? What are the implications? What is the desired use case for SE and EE scenarios? | *Can we need to remove the Utility Facet? What are the implications? What is the desired use case for SE and EE scenarios? | ||
+ | **Let's talk about this more next week when Paul is back. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *M5 planning | ||
===Old Topics=== | ===Old Topics=== | ||
Line 24: | Line 35: | ||
Phase 2 - Add a new menu item on JPA project JPA Tools menu that will open a similar wizard, but won't require users to find the facet properties page. | Phase 2 - Add a new menu item on JPA project JPA Tools menu that will open a similar wizard, but won't require users to find the facet properties page. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We should probably just move straight to phase 2 at this point. | ||
===Next Meeting=== | ===Next Meeting=== |
Latest revision as of 18:11, 4 December 2009
Contents
Dali Weekly Meeting
Attendees
- Neil
- Brian
- Karen
- Shaun
- Tran
Agenda
New Topics
- Should JPA 2.0 be enabled for Java 1.5 facet?
- Metamodel @Generated is a problem in this case, otherwise running in 1.5 shouldn't be a problem.
- (Shaun) should just not use @Generated in 1.5 faceted projects, only use in 1.6 - would need to change logic to recognize metamodel without relying on @Generated annotation
- (Neil) we should try to support this case unless we determine some technical reason or functional reason why we cannot. Appears to be doable.
- What should the preselected Facet configuration be (JPA1.0 or JPA2.0 or calculated(if that is even possible))?
- (Shaun) Not completely obvious. Shaun will go back and do some research, but lets default to JEE 6 JPA 2.0 JDK 1.6 for now.
- (Shaun) we could also add configuration for JPA 2.0 w/ Java 1.5 and 1.6,
- Can we need to remove the Utility Facet? What are the implications? What is the desired use case for SE and EE scenarios?
- Let's talk about this more next week when Paul is back.
- M5 planning
Old Topics
- JPA 1.0 to 2.0 Migration - How can we improve the migration experience without being overbearing?
- Some may wish to continue to use their 1.0 level artifacts, or will be stuck with them in a jar
Could be 2 phases:
Phase 1 - Add "Migrate XML documents" checkbox to current Facet change "Further Configuration..." dialog that will search for and upgrade persistence.xml and orm.xml and eclipselink-orm.xml (based on platform) as a part of the facet change.
Phase 2 - Add a new menu item on JPA project JPA Tools menu that will open a similar wizard, but won't require users to find the facet properties page.
We should probably just move straight to phase 2 at this point.