Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "DaliMeetingMinutes20090714"
m (→Open design issues (UI and model)) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
July 13-14th, 2009 | July 13-14th, 2009 | ||
− | Attendees: | + | Attendees: Shaun, Neil, Karen, Brian, Paul, Tran |
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*UI and model for JPA 2.0 Id (Paul) | *UI and model for JPA 2.0 Id (Paul) | ||
+ | **Generic JPA is slightly different case than EL | ||
+ | ***Generic - source only case, private in foo; - default to Basic mapping in our UI: M-1 default is error with Id | ||
+ | ***EclipseLink - default 1:1 makes interpretation difficult | ||
+ | ***Is option 2 possible, lets consider further? If not, what are the possible solutions, Option 3 - Lobby spec committee for Derived Id. | ||
*JPA 2.0 meta-model generation (Shaun) | *JPA 2.0 meta-model generation (Shaun) | ||
+ | **Probably want incremental generation (on commits) | ||
+ | **Talk to Michael O'Brian and Peter about serialization | ||
**Generally annotation processor created, but might be advantage to doing this with the Dali model | **Generally annotation processor created, but might be advantage to doing this with the Dali model | ||
+ | **Use EL to generate the source code (send an email to Peter) | ||
*Legacy Platform support (Neil) | *Legacy Platform support (Neil) | ||
− | **Should we support EclipseLink 1.x in Dali 3.0? | + | **Should we support EclipseLink 1.x in Dali 3.0? Yes - keep everything for now |
*Platform version requirements (Paul) | *Platform version requirements (Paul) | ||
**Platform UI selection (Neil) | **Platform UI selection (Neil) | ||
Line 20: | Line 27: | ||
**Model events/listeners (Brian) | **Model events/listeners (Brian) | ||
**FindBugs(Brian) | **FindBugs(Brian) | ||
+ | **"2.0" naming and package names | ||
===Other Topics=== | ===Other Topics=== |
Revision as of 09:33, 14 July 2009
Contents
Dali 3.0 Design Meetings
July 13-14th, 2009
Attendees: Shaun, Neil, Karen, Brian, Paul, Tran
Agenda
Open design issues (UI and model)
- UI and model for JPA 2.0 Id (Paul)
- Generic JPA is slightly different case than EL
- Generic - source only case, private in foo; - default to Basic mapping in our UI: M-1 default is error with Id
- EclipseLink - default 1:1 makes interpretation difficult
- Is option 2 possible, lets consider further? If not, what are the possible solutions, Option 3 - Lobby spec committee for Derived Id.
- Generic JPA is slightly different case than EL
- JPA 2.0 meta-model generation (Shaun)
- Probably want incremental generation (on commits)
- Talk to Michael O'Brian and Peter about serialization
- Generally annotation processor created, but might be advantage to doing this with the Dali model
- Use EL to generate the source code (send an email to Peter)
- Legacy Platform support (Neil)
- Should we support EclipseLink 1.x in Dali 3.0? Yes - keep everything for now
- Platform version requirements (Paul)
- Platform UI selection (Neil)
- Code Topics
- Conversion to Iterables (Brian)
- Model events/listeners (Brian)
- FindBugs(Brian)
- "2.0" naming and package names
Other Topics
- XML Translator issues
- Need to escalate these issues and determine if support is going to be sufficient moving forward