Difference between revisions of "DTP PMC and Project Lead Meeting: August 20, 2007"

From Eclipsepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: ==Attendees== ==Regrets== ==Agenda== ==Minutes== ==Action Items==)
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
←[[DTP PMC and Project Lead Meeting | Back to DTP PMC and Project Lead Meeting page]]
 
==Attendees==
 
==Attendees==
 
+
*John Graham
 +
*Brian Fitzpatrick
 +
*Linda Chan
 +
*Hung Hsi
 
==Regrets==
 
==Regrets==
 
+
*Der-Ping Chou
 +
*Sheila Sholars
 +
*Brian Payton
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
 
+
*Need volunteer to participate in discussion around [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=198541 198541], report options/decision points to PMC.
 +
*Take a look at the [[Ganymede_Simultaneous_Release | Ganymede Simultaneous release]] page
 +
**Must Dos/Should Dos under discussion, to be approved at next Planning Council face-to-face meeting (early October)
 +
**We should think about these items, send notes to DTP PMC, so our views can be expressed to the Planning Council
 +
*DTP Ganymede planning: Documents on wiki for review and discussion:
 +
**[[DTP_Ganymede_Project_Plan | Project Plan]]
 +
***Themes and priorities: comments?
 +
***Can we have project schedules complete by 10/1?
 +
**[[DTP_Ganymede_Build_Environment | Build Environment]]
 +
***Trying for support of Eclipse 3.3 and 3.4: this is necessary?
 +
***JVM 1.5 on both: What about JVM 1.6?
 +
**[[DTP_Ganymede_Build_Schedule | Build Schedule]]
 +
***Fairly standard, dates for I-builds not specified yet
 +
**[[DTP_Ganymede_Development_Environment | Development Environment]]
 +
***This was easy to get wrong during DTP 1.5, hoping that experience makes DTP Ganymede better on this item
 +
**[[DTP_Ganymede_Development_Guidelines | Development Guidelines]]
 +
***Mainly items from previous versions of dev guidelines
 +
***Important new action item: resolution of ''Discouraged Access'' warnings: Are these a goal for DTP Ganymede?
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 
+
*No volunteer so far for [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=198541 198541]
 +
*Discussion of DTP Ganymede planning:
 +
**Decision (in absence of Model Base representation): Detailed project plans for 10/1, drafts by mid-September
 +
**Discussion item: Which version of Java should be supported? Linda points out that there might be use cases for continuing with 1.4 as the base.
 +
**General agreement that resolve of ''Discouraged Access'' warnings should be a goal for DTP Ganymede. Most likely we will not resolve all of these, but at least we should document (as a bug) any remaining.
 +
**General feeling was the Eclipse 3.3 and 3.4 support (like we did for 3.2 and 3.3 in Europa) is desirable if possible.
 +
*Requirements calls for DTP Ganymede will be scheduled in the coming weeks.
 
==Action Items==
 
==Action Items==
 +
*'''(Project leads):''' DTP Ganymede detailed project plans for 10/1. Drafts available by mid-September.

Latest revision as of 15:01, 20 August 2007

Back to DTP PMC and Project Lead Meeting page

Contents

[edit] Attendees

  • John Graham
  • Brian Fitzpatrick
  • Linda Chan
  • Hung Hsi

[edit] Regrets

  • Der-Ping Chou
  • Sheila Sholars
  • Brian Payton

[edit] Agenda

  • Need volunteer to participate in discussion around 198541, report options/decision points to PMC.
  • Take a look at the Ganymede Simultaneous release page
    • Must Dos/Should Dos under discussion, to be approved at next Planning Council face-to-face meeting (early October)
    • We should think about these items, send notes to DTP PMC, so our views can be expressed to the Planning Council
  • DTP Ganymede planning: Documents on wiki for review and discussion:
    • Project Plan
      • Themes and priorities: comments?
      • Can we have project schedules complete by 10/1?
    • Build Environment
      • Trying for support of Eclipse 3.3 and 3.4: this is necessary?
      • JVM 1.5 on both: What about JVM 1.6?
    • Build Schedule
      • Fairly standard, dates for I-builds not specified yet
    • Development Environment
      • This was easy to get wrong during DTP 1.5, hoping that experience makes DTP Ganymede better on this item
    • Development Guidelines
      • Mainly items from previous versions of dev guidelines
      • Important new action item: resolution of Discouraged Access warnings: Are these a goal for DTP Ganymede?

[edit] Minutes

  • No volunteer so far for 198541
  • Discussion of DTP Ganymede planning:
    • Decision (in absence of Model Base representation): Detailed project plans for 10/1, drafts by mid-September
    • Discussion item: Which version of Java should be supported? Linda points out that there might be use cases for continuing with 1.4 as the base.
    • General agreement that resolve of Discouraged Access warnings should be a goal for DTP Ganymede. Most likely we will not resolve all of these, but at least we should document (as a bug) any remaining.
    • General feeling was the Eclipse 3.3 and 3.4 support (like we did for 3.2 and 3.3 in Europa) is desirable if possible.
  • Requirements calls for DTP Ganymede will be scheduled in the coming weeks.

[edit] Action Items

  • (Project leads): DTP Ganymede detailed project plans for 10/1. Drafts available by mid-September.