Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "DTP PMC Meeting October 31, 2006"

 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
**Each PMC member should make an effort to inform known DTP and WTP/rdb adopters about these calls
 
**Each PMC member should make an effort to inform known DTP and WTP/rdb adopters about these calls
 
**Purpose of these meetings is to discuss process and themes, not specific requirements
 
**Purpose of these meetings is to discuss process and themes, not specific requirements
 +
==Action Items==
 +
*John: Create Bugzilla queries for use in status meetings
 +
**Update 11/1: [[DTP_1.0_Useful_Bugzilla_Queries | Wiki page]] with links created
 +
*PMC: Consider API policy statement alternatives for next week
 +
*PMC: Contact potentially interested parties about Requirements Council meetings

Revision as of 11:48, 1 November 2006

Attendees

  • John Graham
  • Sheila Sholars
  • Linda Chan

Minutes

  • Update on DTP proposals for EclipseCon 2007: 3 short tutorials have been proposed:
  • Overview of DTP 1.0 API process
    • Summary from 10/30 PMC & Project Lead meeting
    • Waiting for any feedback on process
  • DTP 1.0 status: M4 builds proceeding as usual
  • Suggestion that DTP might need a point release (like 1.2) just before EclipseCon 2007
  • Discussion of next Requirements Council calls
    • Two calls scheduled to cover as many time zones as possible
    • Each PMC member should make an effort to inform known DTP and WTP/rdb adopters about these calls
    • Purpose of these meetings is to discuss process and themes, not specific requirements

Action Items

  • John: Create Bugzilla queries for use in status meetings
  • PMC: Consider API policy statement alternatives for next week
  • PMC: Contact potentially interested parties about Requirements Council meetings