Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "DTP PMC Meeting, September 30, 2008"
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
**If we're switching to JDK 1.5, that's going to require a branch long before 11/5. There will be a fair amount of fixing that needs to be done. | **If we're switching to JDK 1.5, that's going to require a branch long before 11/5. There will be a fair amount of fixing that needs to be done. | ||
**As for the API refactoring, it was decided last night that the Connectivity API refactoring isn't required for this release. However, I'm still hopeful that the SQL Editor UI/non-UI refactoring will occur. And depending on the degree of change, it may be an API-breaking change and require a 2.0 vs. 1.7 designation. | **As for the API refactoring, it was decided last night that the Connectivity API refactoring isn't required for this release. However, I'm still hopeful that the SQL Editor UI/non-UI refactoring will occur. And depending on the degree of change, it may be an API-breaking change and require a 2.0 vs. 1.7 designation. | ||
| − | + | *(John) Discussion of consolidated servers view [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=247934 BZ247934] | |
*Open discussion | *Open discussion | ||
Revision as of 11:53, 30 September 2008
← Back to DTP PMC Meeting Page
Attendees
- Brian Fitzpatrick
- Linda Chan
- John Graham
- Sheila Sholars
Regrets
Agenda
- Decide on JDK level (looks like JDK 1.5 for the build platform)
- Decide on Branch date for Galileo (first milestone we're really concerned with is M3, which is dated 11/5/2008 for +1 projects)
- If we're switching to JDK 1.5, that's going to require a branch long before 11/5. There will be a fair amount of fixing that needs to be done.
- As for the API refactoring, it was decided last night that the Connectivity API refactoring isn't required for this release. However, I'm still hopeful that the SQL Editor UI/non-UI refactoring will occur. And depending on the degree of change, it may be an API-breaking change and require a 2.0 vs. 1.7 designation.
- (John) Discussion of consolidated servers view BZ247934
- Open discussion