Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "DTP PMC Meeting, June 24, 2008"

(Agenda)
(Agenda)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
*Discuss do we need release candidate milestones for 1.6.1
 
*Discuss do we need release candidate milestones for 1.6.1
 
*Discuss date stamps on final DTP 1.6 zips/update site files
 
*Discuss date stamps on final DTP 1.6 zips/update site files
 +
*Fun - DTP t-shirt (http://www.cafepress.com/fitzdtp)
 
*Open discussion
 
*Open discussion
  

Revision as of 12:36, 24 June 2008

Back to DTP PMC Meeting Page

Attendees

  • Brian Fitzpatrick
  • Linda Chan
  • Sheila Sholars
  • John Graham

Regrets

Agenda

  • Discuss do we need release candidate milestones for 1.6.1
  • Discuss date stamps on final DTP 1.6 zips/update site files
  • Fun - DTP t-shirt (http://www.cafepress.com/fitzdtp)
  • Open discussion

Minutes

Action Items

  • New dependencies need to be approved, especially those across other projects, orbit, 3rd party, or whatever - need to write up as part of the DTP policies and procedures
  • Need to add some policy regarding extension point documentation. Declare that if new extension points are added, they must have documentation by the mid-point milestone.

Tabled for Later Discussion

  • Discuss after Ganymede release
    • Discuss DTP charter change to simplify addition of a committer to two or more subprojects at the same time without going through separate committer elections
    • Perhaps in the future come up with a Component architecture document that shows DTP dependencies to consumers
    • Schedule a "scrubbing" pass of the bug backlog after 1.6 (over the summer) to close bugs that we won't ever fix (minor tweaks, things that have been obsoleted along the way, etc.) to try and reduce the bug count
    • Things to consider for next major release (June 2009) - JDK 1.4 end of life, move to JDK 1.5 in next release? Depends on platform support. Something to discuss going forward