Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "DSDP/MTJ/Phone Meeting 25-Jan-2007"

< DSDP‎ | MTJ
 
 
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 
Fragmentation requires some changes to JDT. Discussion how this could be handled.
 
Fragmentation requires some changes to JDT. Discussion how this could be handled.
- EclipseME has done it in different way.
+
* EclipseME has done it in different way.
- byte code onfly
+
:*byte code onfly
- not the best possible solution
+
:*not the best possible solution
- Should be solved somehow, as others are able to do it: NetBeans, JMEPolish
+
*Should be solved somehow, as others are able to do it: NetBeans, JMEPolish
- JDT people are reluctant to make needed changes
+
*JDT team is reluctant to make needed changes
- MTJ proposal for preprocessing-JDT should be done
+
*MTJ proposal for preprocessing-JDT should be done
- Where preproseccing touches: editor, debugger, compiler
+
:*Where preproseccing touches: editor, debugger, compiler
- Enough Software should be get into loop to discuss about the solution
+
:*Enough Software should be get into loop to discuss about the solution
- Craig will reopen the bug report in Bugzilla
+
*Craig will reopen the bug report in Bugzilla
  
  

Latest revision as of 05:58, 26 January 2007

Attendees

  • Craig Setera, EclipseME
  • Arto Laurila, Nokia
  • Rauno Seppälä, Nokia


Notes

some relevant notes from previous minutes left here, as they still apply


Schedule

Let's fill in Target Milestones to wiki Release 2 Planning in order to see the content for M1.


Status of feature list

No changes


Status of use cases

No Changes


Content of M1

Obfuscation

Localization

Fragmentation Core Services

Fragmentation Metadata Services

Generic SDK 3/4 done


Let's continue to plan via Release 2 Planning using Target Milestone field.


Fragmentation

Fragmentation requires some changes to JDT. Discussion how this could be handled.

  • EclipseME has done it in different way.
  • byte code onfly
  • not the best possible solution
  • Should be solved somehow, as others are able to do it: NetBeans, JMEPolish
  • JDT team is reluctant to make needed changes
  • MTJ proposal for preprocessing-JDT should be done
  • Where preproseccing touches: editor, debugger, compiler
  • Enough Software should be get into loop to discuss about the solution
  • Craig will reopen the bug report in Bugzilla


AOB

Update about Motorola meeting results

Update about Symbian meeting results


Next meeting

  • Next one on the 1st of February, 2007


Action Points

OLD

AP: Arto to provide a summary of areas that he needs help, ONGOING
AP: Kevin to provide Use Cases. ONGOING
AP Rauno: Provide two weeks commenting time for UI and Flow Designer cases, then officially approve them. ONGOING:
This will continue as readabilty of wiki pages wasn't good enough.