Difference between revisions of "DSDP/MTJ/Discussion/Refactoring/EP"

From Eclipsepedia

< DSDP‎ | MTJ‎ | Discussion‎ | Refactoring
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Current Extension Point List  ==
 +
 
We currently have the following list of Extension points:
 
We currently have the following list of Extension points:
  
Line 6: Line 8:
 
** Extension that provides a listing of supported Java ME Configurations.
 
** Extension that provides a listing of supported Java ME Configurations.
 
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.deviceImporter'''
 
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.deviceImporter'''
 +
** provides a means for registering new types of device importers
 
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.library.MIDletLibrary'''
 
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.library.MIDletLibrary'''
 
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.profiles'''
 
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.profiles'''

Revision as of 09:20, 29 January 2009

Current Extension Point List

We currently have the following list of Extension points:

  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.api
    • Representation of an Java ME application programming interface (API).
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.configurations
    • Extension that provides a listing of supported Java ME Configurations.
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.deviceImporter
    • provides a means for registering new types of device importers
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.library.MIDletLibrary
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.profiles
  • org.eclipse.me.ui.deviceEditor
  • org.eclipse.mtj.ui.venderSpecJADAttributes
  • org.eclipse.mtj.ui.jadEditorPages


Refactory Suggestions

   org.eclipse.mtj.core.api 
    * Are we the only ones that implements this E.P?
    * Is it really necessary? since the UEI standard provides a way to gather the APIs from a SDK's device
    * The skeletonFile element is not used anymore