Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "DSDP/MTJ/Discussion/Refactoring/EP"

< DSDP‎ | MTJ‎ | Discussion‎ | Refactoring
(New page: '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.api''' * Are we the only ones that implements this E.P? * Is it really necessary? since the UEI standard provides a way to gather the APIs from a SD...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
We currently have the following list of Extension points:
 +
 +
*  org.eclipse.mtj.core.api
 +
** Representation of an Java ME application programming interface (API).
 +
* org.eclipse.mtj.core.configurations
 +
** Extension that provides a listing of supported Java ME Configurations.
 +
* org.eclipse.mtj.core.deviceImporter
 +
* org.eclipse.mtj.core.library.MIDletLibrary
 +
* org.eclipse.mtj.core.profiles
 +
* org.eclipse.me.ui.deviceEditor
 +
* org.eclipse.mtj.ui.venderSpecJADAttributes
 +
* org.eclipse.mtj.ui.jadEditorPages
 +
  
 
     '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.api'''  
 
     '''org.eclipse.mtj.core.api'''  

Revision as of 09:16, 29 January 2009

We currently have the following list of Extension points:

  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.api
    • Representation of an Java ME application programming interface (API).
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.configurations
    • Extension that provides a listing of supported Java ME Configurations.
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.deviceImporter
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.library.MIDletLibrary
  • org.eclipse.mtj.core.profiles
  • org.eclipse.me.ui.deviceEditor
  • org.eclipse.mtj.ui.venderSpecJADAttributes
  • org.eclipse.mtj.ui.jadEditorPages


   org.eclipse.mtj.core.api 
    * Are we the only ones that implements this E.P?
    * Is it really necessary? since the UEI standard provides a way to gather the APIs from a SDK's device
    * The skeletonFile element is not used anymore