Difference between revisions of "DSDP/MTJ/Developer Resources/Contributor Confirmations"

From Eclipsepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
'''I.e.''':
 
'''I.e.''':
 
 
{| style=" border: 1px solid #666699; padding: 3px 10px 3px 10px; width: 767px; height: 132px; align=left; background-color: #ADDFAD;"
 
{| style=" border: 1px solid #666699; padding: 3px 10px 3px 10px; width: 767px; height: 132px; align=left; background-color: #ADDFAD;"
 
|+ <br>  
 
|+ <br>  
Line 14: Line 13:
  
 
|}
 
|}
 +
  
 
'''I.e. 2''':
 
'''I.e. 2''':
 +
 
[https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273604#c20 New projects and features required for pulsar]
 
[https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273604#c20 New projects and features required for pulsar]

Revision as of 08:51, 14 August 2009

After contributing a patch to a bug, the contributor must make the following statements on the bugzilla bug that has been referenced:

  1. wrote 100% of the code;
  2. they have the right to contribute the code to Eclipse; and
  3. the file header contains the EPL License header.

I.e.:


    I, (name) have created the patch(es) (the patch(es) attachment(s) id(s)) solely based on existing (EPL licensed) code in the MTJ project, and wrote all new code 100% myself, without using any other open source or proprietary source code as a basis for my work.

   I am making my contribution available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License (EPL) to be included in the codebase of the MTJ project.


I.e. 2:

New projects and features required for pulsar