Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "DSDP/MTJ/Developer Resources/Contributor Confirmations"

 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
#the file header contains the [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/copyrightandlicensenotice.php '''EPL License header'''].<br><br>
 
#the file header contains the [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/copyrightandlicensenotice.php '''EPL License header'''].<br><br>
  
'''I.e.''':
+
'''Template Message''':
 
{| style=" border: 1px solid #666699; padding: 3px 10px 3px 10px; width: 767px; height: 132px; align=left; background-color: #ADDFAD;"
 
{| style=" border: 1px solid #666699; padding: 3px 10px 3px 10px; width: 767px; height: 132px; align=left; background-color: #ADDFAD;"
 
|+ <br>  
 
|+ <br>  
Line 15: Line 15:
  
  
'''I.e. 2''':
+
'''I.e.''':
  
 
[https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273604#c20 New projects and features required for pulsar]
 
[https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273604#c20 New projects and features required for pulsar]
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:DSDP]] [[Category:MTJ]]

Latest revision as of 08:47, 14 August 2009

After contributing a patch to a bug, the contributor must make the following statements on the bugzilla bug that has been referenced:

  1. wrote 100% of the code;
  2. they have the right to contribute the code to Eclipse; and
  3. the file header contains the EPL License header.

Template Message:


    I, (name) have created the patch(es) (the patch(es) attachment(s) id(s)) solely based on existing (EPL licensed) code in the MTJ project, and wrote all new code 100% myself, without using any other open source or proprietary source code as a basis for my work.

   I am making my contribution available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License (EPL) to be included in the codebase of the MTJ project.


I.e.:

New projects and features required for pulsar