Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "DSDP/DD/Phone 3-January-2008"

< DSDP‎ | DD
m (Agenda and Notes)
m
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
== Attendess ==
 
== Attendess ==
 
+
Pawel, Mikhail, Anthony, Darin, Randy, Mark, Ted, Ken
  
 
== Agenda and Notes ==
 
== Agenda and Notes ==
Line 30: Line 30:
 
*** Filed a number of platform bugs to ensure compatibility with DSF (212314, 212316, 213069, 213074, 213244, 213609, 166155).
 
*** Filed a number of platform bugs to ensure compatibility with DSF (212314, 212316, 213069, 213074, 213244, 213609, 166155).
 
*** Started refactoring UI (view model) classes.
 
*** Started refactoring UI (view model) classes.
** ''GDB/MI (Francois)''
+
** ''GDB/MI (Marc)''
 +
*** Francois is out on vacation
 
*** Veenu is out on maternity leave.
 
*** Veenu is out on maternity leave.
 
** ''Multi Context (Pawel)''
 
** ''Multi Context (Pawel)''

Revision as of 11:33, 3 January 2008

Call Info

Meeting Title: Conference Call on Device Debugging
Date & Time: Thursday 3 January 2008 at 7:30am PDT / 10:30am EDT
USA tool free dial-in: (888) 545-8370
International dial-in: (770) 659-3936
Passcode: 5107492128#

Attendess

Pawel, Mikhail, Anthony, Darin, Randy, Mark, Ted, Ken

Agenda and Notes

  • Status bu sub-group
    • SPIRIT (Anthony)
    • Memory (Samantha)
      • Samantha is out on vacation.
    • Disassembly (Mikhail)
    • DSF (Pawel)
      • Filed a number of platform bugs to ensure compatibility with DSF (212314, 212316, 213069, 213074, 213244, 213609, 166155).
      • Started refactoring UI (view model) classes.
    • GDB/MI (Marc)
      • Francois is out on vacation
      • Veenu is out on maternity leave.
    • Multi Context (Pawel)
  • Discussion Topics
  • Action Items:
    • Samantha (oustanding): review the CDT Modules view documentation and decide whether it would conflict with IBMs Modules view.

Back to the top