Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Cosmos Architecture Meeting 01-Nov-07"

(General Error Handling and Logging across COSMOS components)
(Minutes)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* Localization
 
* Localization
 
* Namespaces (how do we choose this)
 
* Namespaces (how do we choose this)
 +
* Lay the groundwork for serviceability
  
 
=== General Error Handling and Logging across COSMOS components ===
 
=== General Error Handling and Logging across COSMOS components ===
Line 33: Line 34:
 
** Do we choose CBE or WEF
 
** Do we choose CBE or WEF
 
* Symptoms
 
* Symptoms
* Lay the groundwork for serviceability
 
  
  

Revision as of 11:36, 1 November 2007

Attendees

  • Bill Muldoon
  • Saraub Dravid
  • David Whiteman
  • Balan Subramanian
  • Valentina Popescu
  • Jack Devine
  • Jimmy Mohsin
  • Hubert Leung
  • Don Ebright
  • Ali Mehregani
  • Mao Sheng
  • John Todd

Minutes

  • Localization
  • Namespaces (how do we choose this)
  • Lay the groundwork for serviceability

General Error Handling and Logging across COSMOS components

Logging Requirements

  • We would like to have consistency from the log to the component to the code
    • We should also be consistent in identification, including the instance identifier
    • Tie the instance identifier to the management endpoint (WSDM) that can be used to control the component
  • What is the structure of the logs--a physical view?
  • Need to define the "logging architecture"
  • Tracing/Logging levels
  • Need to have description of error log.
  • Would like to have one logical view of the log.
  • Standardized log format
    • Do we choose CBE or WEF
  • Symptoms



Error/Exceptions Requirement

  • Must log these

Back to the top