Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

COSMOS ME Minutes 19AUG08

Revision as of 11:21, 25 August 2008 by Jason.losh.sas.com (Talk | contribs) (New page: == Logistics == * Date: 19AUG08 * Time: 11AM EST * Attendees: Chris Mildebrandt, Charlie Halloran, David Whiteman, Eric Rose, Brad Beck, Merri Jensen, Jeff Hamm, Robert DeMason, Josh Heste...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Logistics

  • Date: 19AUG08
  • Time: 11AM EST
  • Attendees: Chris Mildebrandt, Charlie Halloran, David Whiteman, Eric Rose, Brad Beck, Merri Jensen, Jeff Hamm, Robert DeMason, Josh Hester, Mark McCraw

Minutes

  1. Administrative/roll call
  2. i13 status review
    • i13 plan wasn't formally approved at the summit call, but we should move forward with the ERs identified on the i13 plan as if it was.
    • Josh noted that there were a couple of additional ERs to add for the aggregator rules.
    • Eric and Josh also adding bug fixes to the i13 status page.
  3. Community update
    • Jason discussed the potential for additional membership to COSMOS.
  4. Tooling update
    • Josh/Robert moving forward on the rules and they are on target with the ERs identified for i13
    • Eric got final approval on SPI
    • The change analyzer has been switched to the new SPI
    • Merri making progress on change analyzer. Jeff is running the COSMOS SDD through change analyzer.
  5. SDD update
    • Vote is underway and closes at month's end.
  6. Runtime work
    • P2 and SDD runtime alignment is ongoing
    • Design for the change resolver is in progress
    • Change analyzer being stitched into the P2 framework
  7. Future discussion items
    • SML/SDD discussion pending internal IBM review
    • CMDBf toolkit integration - pending more P2 research
    • SDD/OVF alignment - OASIS SDD TC has initiated steps to align these two standards via some formal agreement/understanding between each work group
    • CML - more research needed to shape this discussion

Back to the top