Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "COSMOSCommunityMeeting20080820"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
CA | CA | ||
* JT, Bill Muldoon inactive for a while | * JT, Bill Muldoon inactive for a while | ||
− | * Martin | + | * Martin, Leonard, Jimmy, Paul active |
IBM | IBM | ||
* Ruth, Mark, Sheldon, Hubert, Ali inactive for a while. | * Ruth, Mark, Sheldon, Hubert, Ali inactive for a while. | ||
* David, Eric, Saurabh remain active | * David, Eric, Saurabh remain active | ||
+ | * Richard Vasconi permanently gone | ||
+ | What to do? Active vs inactive? | ||
* People who are gone should be removed and people on hiatus leave for now? | * People who are gone should be removed and people on hiatus leave for now? | ||
* Jimmy to look for a definition of active - how active do we need to be? | * Jimmy to look for a definition of active - how active do we need to be? |
Latest revision as of 11:04, 20 August 2008
Att: Jack Leonard Tina Saurabh Jason Srinivas David Craig Paul
Countdown to 1.0
- need a criteria for which ones are wontfix vs future. future something we have a strong interest now but wontfix but there hasn't been a lot of interest indicated in it.
- WSDM, OSGi, CBE, and other deprecated code to be wontfix
- everything else that cannot be contained in 1.0 to be future
- use i14 for anything not committed to 1.0 but in consideration for 1.0
- break down the bugzilla list in the countdown page into "must do for 1.0" and "want to do in 1.0 but can drop if necessary"
CA
- JT, Bill Muldoon inactive for a while
- Martin, Leonard, Jimmy, Paul active
IBM
- Ruth, Mark, Sheldon, Hubert, Ali inactive for a while.
- David, Eric, Saurabh remain active
- Richard Vasconi permanently gone
What to do? Active vs inactive?
- People who are gone should be removed and people on hiatus leave for now?
- Jimmy to look for a definition of active - how active do we need to be?
i13 plan
- API cleaned up? yes
- Jimmy to assign the remaining ones assigned to JT & Bill in the next little while
- QA to run the end-to-end testing? yes, already run.
- proceed, won't promote to a weekly candidate
- need to arrange for a technical review, get the doc requirements gathered in the next week. Ruth to send a proposal to cosmos-dev (developers who know that their stuff has changed to review the docs for their stuff, make changes to the HTML)