Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Architecture Council/Meetings/December 10 2015"
m (→New Topics) |
|||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
===All Attendees=== | ===All Attendees=== | ||
| − | * '''Regrets:''' | + | * '''In attendance:''' John Arthorne, Wayne Beaton, Marcel Bruch (joined late), Christian Campo, Maximilian Kögel, Martin Lippert, Dani Megert, Martin O, Pascal Rapicault, Doug Schaefer, Michael Scharf, Krum Tsvetkov, David Williams, |
| + | * '''Regrets:''' Alex Kurtakov, Jonas Helming, Eike Stepper, Lars Vogel | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 80: | Line 81: | ||
* '''No-Show:''' Chris Aniszczyk, John Arthorne, Nick Boldt, Cédric Brun, Ian Bull, Christian Campo, Dave Carver, Doug Clarke, Kenn Hussey, Mik Kersten, Achim Lörke, Markus Knauer, Ed Merks, Mike Milinkovich, Kim Moir, Adrian Mos, Gunnar Wagenknecht, Bernd Kolb | * '''No-Show:''' Chris Aniszczyk, John Arthorne, Nick Boldt, Cédric Brun, Ian Bull, Christian Campo, Dave Carver, Doug Clarke, Kenn Hussey, Mik Kersten, Achim Lörke, Markus Knauer, Ed Merks, Mike Milinkovich, Kim Moir, Adrian Mos, Gunnar Wagenknecht, Bernd Kolb | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | |||
== Agenda / Notes == | == Agenda / Notes == | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
* Feel free to fill in, but not during the meeting :) | * Feel free to fill in, but not during the meeting :) | ||
| + | * (Wayne) New member nominations (please bring a list of names to the next meeting) -- quick discussion, Wayne will nominate | ||
| + | ==== Wayne: Know your Projects Proposal ==== | ||
* (Wayne) Know (y)our projects: should we have project leads deliver short presentations during this meeting (to better understand the projects that we serve). | * (Wayne) Know (y)our projects: should we have project leads deliver short presentations during this meeting (to better understand the projects that we serve). | ||
| − | * | + | * Vladimir from the Handley project - frustration around no visiblity in the Eclipse Community |
| + | * Could be a win-win situation with a 10 min "elevator pitch" to the AC - raise awareness with the projects | ||
| + | ** Doug: Could we do that with MeetUps? - IoT MeetUp went pretty well | ||
| + | ** Wayne: A 1-hour meeting is great for going in depth, but probably not what we want here | ||
| + | ** John: For Handley, the value proposition is quite abstract (people building language tooling) | ||
| + | ** Michael: 10-minute video with the Elevator Pitch ? - Wayne agrees, video channel helps a lot but doing videos is time consuming | ||
| + | * Pascal: If projects want to be heard, why don't they submit to EclipseCon? | ||
| + | * RESOLUTION: Posting a 10-min video is likely more efficient than presenting to the AC where there's just a few people. | ||
| + | ** '''AI Wayne''' to create channel | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Wayne: EclipseCon ==== | ||
* (Wayne) EclipseCon | * (Wayne) EclipseCon | ||
| + | ** F2F meeting - Doodle Poll set up but only a handful responses so far, please submit | ||
| + | ** Michael: ECon Videos? - ECE should have all videos up except two. EC NA just recording in 2 rooms. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Role of the AC ==== | ||
| + | * Recent postings by Ed Merks on cross-projects ignited some architecture related (online) discussions | ||
| + | ** Why don't we have such discussions on the AC Calls ? | ||
| + | ** Committers don't know an AC exists | ||
| + | * Maybe a 2-day F2F meeting is overdue, to come up with 10 or 20 concrete recommendations that projects should do | ||
| + | ** Pascal suggests a Form for committers to ask "How do I..." kind of questions | ||
| + | ** Doug: The new Mattermost initiative has great potential hooking folks together | ||
| + | * Martin: Recommendations make sense where an issue hurts? | ||
| + | * '''AI Martin''' send link to the previous top 10 recommendations | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== (Marcel) FEEP Recommendations ==== | ||
| + | |||
* (Marcel) Resolution of the AC recommendations for the first Iteration of FEEP | * (Marcel) Resolution of the AC recommendations for the first Iteration of FEEP | ||
| + | ** Proposal to forward the Google Doc sheet to EMO without further discussion | ||
| + | ** Agreement that the voting process was fair and needs no further discussion --> '''AI Marcel''' send sheet to the EMO | ||
<!--- | <!--- | ||
Revision as of 12:40, 10 December 2015
| Meeting Title: | Architecture Council Monthly Meeting |
| Date & Time: | Thursday Dec 10, 2015 at 1100 Ottawa  HTML |  iCal
|
| Dial-in: | Let's use the Foundation's Asterisk setup for this call:
Participant conference extension: 701 then enter pin: 51968
|
Contents
Attendees
All AC Members are invited.
- PMC Reps please confirm attendance or list your delegate below. Every PMC is required to name a primary and backup delegate, and to ensure that one delegate attends the meeting.
| BIRT: | Wenfeng Li | Wenbin He |
| DTP: | Brian Payton | Linda Chan |
| Eclipse: | Mike Wilson | John Arthorne |
| Modeling: | Ed Merks | Cédric Brun Eike Stepper |
| Mylyn: | Steffen Pingel | Mik Kersten |
| RT: | Christian Campo | Tom Watson Doug Clarke Ian Bull |
| SOA: | Adrian Mos | Marc Dutoo |
| Technology: | Gunnar Wagenknecht | Wayne Beaton |
| Tools: | Doug Schaefer | |
| WTP: | Chuck Bridgham | Neil Hauge |
All Attendees
- In attendance: John Arthorne, Wayne Beaton, Marcel Bruch (joined late), Christian Campo, Maximilian Kögel, Martin Lippert, Dani Megert, Martin O, Pascal Rapicault, Doug Schaefer, Michael Scharf, Krum Tsvetkov, David Williams,
- Regrets: Alex Kurtakov, Jonas Helming, Eike Stepper, Lars Vogel
Agenda / Notes
- Feel free to edit, but not during the call!
Review of Last Meeting
- Architecture Council/Meetings/November 12 2015
- Still open items moved to #Action_Items
New Topics
- Feel free to fill in, but not during the meeting :)
- (Wayne) New member nominations (please bring a list of names to the next meeting) -- quick discussion, Wayne will nominate
Wayne: Know your Projects Proposal
- (Wayne) Know (y)our projects: should we have project leads deliver short presentations during this meeting (to better understand the projects that we serve).
- Vladimir from the Handley project - frustration around no visiblity in the Eclipse Community
- Could be a win-win situation with a 10 min "elevator pitch" to the AC - raise awareness with the projects
- Doug: Could we do that with MeetUps? - IoT MeetUp went pretty well
- Wayne: A 1-hour meeting is great for going in depth, but probably not what we want here
- John: For Handley, the value proposition is quite abstract (people building language tooling)
- Michael: 10-minute video with the Elevator Pitch ? - Wayne agrees, video channel helps a lot but doing videos is time consuming
- Pascal: If projects want to be heard, why don't they submit to EclipseCon?
- RESOLUTION: Posting a 10-min video is likely more efficient than presenting to the AC where there's just a few people.
- AI Wayne to create channel
Wayne: EclipseCon
- (Wayne) EclipseCon
- F2F meeting - Doodle Poll set up but only a handful responses so far, please submit
- Michael: ECon Videos? - ECE should have all videos up except two. EC NA just recording in 2 rooms.
Role of the AC
- Recent postings by Ed Merks on cross-projects ignited some architecture related (online) discussions
- Why don't we have such discussions on the AC Calls ?
- Committers don't know an AC exists
- Maybe a 2-day F2F meeting is overdue, to come up with 10 or 20 concrete recommendations that projects should do
- Pascal suggests a Form for committers to ask "How do I..." kind of questions
- Doug: The new Mattermost initiative has great potential hooking folks together
- Martin: Recommendations make sense where an issue hurts?
- AI Martin send link to the previous top 10 recommendations
(Marcel) FEEP Recommendations
- (Marcel) Resolution of the AC recommendations for the first Iteration of FEEP
- Proposal to forward the Google Doc sheet to EMO without further discussion
- Agreement that the voting process was fair and needs no further discussion --> AI Marcel send sheet to the EMO