Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:JDT Core Programmer Guide/MetaIndex"
(Created page with "Where you discuss "capturing of package names are done in BinaryIndexes" you list a few locations, where type references are found, but the implementation doesn't actually car...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Where you discuss "capturing of package names are done in BinaryIndexes" you list a few locations, where type references are found, but the implementation doesn't actually care. It simply reads all entries of the constant pool. Otherwise we would be missing a lot of type references! I believe the implementation more than the description :) or am I missing anything? --[[User:Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de|Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de]] ([[User talk:Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de|talk]]) 16:15, 29 March 2021 (EDT) | Where you discuss "capturing of package names are done in BinaryIndexes" you list a few locations, where type references are found, but the implementation doesn't actually care. It simply reads all entries of the constant pool. Otherwise we would be missing a lot of type references! I believe the implementation more than the description :) or am I missing anything? --[[User:Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de|Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de]] ([[User talk:Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de|talk]]) 16:15, 29 March 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | "Extract package names from all none * imports" - why treat wildcard imports differently? They, too, contain the full package part of each qualified name. --[[User:Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de|Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de]] ([[User talk:Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de|talk]]) 16:18, 29 March 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 29 March 2021
Where you discuss "capturing of package names are done in BinaryIndexes" you list a few locations, where type references are found, but the implementation doesn't actually care. It simply reads all entries of the constant pool. Otherwise we would be missing a lot of type references! I believe the implementation more than the description :) or am I missing anything? --Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2021 (EDT)
"Extract package names from all none * imports" - why treat wildcard imports differently? They, too, contain the full package part of each qualified name. --Stephan.herrmann.berlin.de (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2021 (EDT)