Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "RT/meetings/PMC Minutes 100811"

< RT‎ | meetings
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
* Jeff
 
* Jeff
 +
* Mike
 +
* Tom
  
 
== Agenda  ==
 
== Agenda  ==
 +
* CQs
 +
** There has been ongoing discussion about the CQ backlog
 +
** We started to go through the open CQs but quickly found that the PMC's position in the various scenarios was not clearly stated or understood.
 +
** The [[RT/IP_FAQ]] is a good start but is not categorical nor definitive.
 +
** One direction is to fill out the FAQ with scenarios (Test but not ship, Test, reference but not ship, check into repo but not ...) and get PMC-wide agreement on the scenarios and IP approaches.
 +
** With that in hand we can easily address CQs
 +
** Mike agreed to take an initial stab at the scenarios
 +
** Parties that have a particular stake in this should pitch in to drive this to resolution
 +
 +
* OSGi RFC 138 discussion.
 +
** There was a brief discussion around recent changes in RFC 138.
 +
** Equinox will have the required hooks but will not have an implementation.
 +
** RT (or other) projects needing the upper layer will need to do/get one
 +
** we should coordinate if multiple projects have similar needs

Latest revision as of 09:33, 11 August 2010

Attendees

  • Jeff
  • Mike
  • Tom

Agenda

  • CQs
    • There has been ongoing discussion about the CQ backlog
    • We started to go through the open CQs but quickly found that the PMC's position in the various scenarios was not clearly stated or understood.
    • The RT/IP_FAQ is a good start but is not categorical nor definitive.
    • One direction is to fill out the FAQ with scenarios (Test but not ship, Test, reference but not ship, check into repo but not ...) and get PMC-wide agreement on the scenarios and IP approaches.
    • With that in hand we can easily address CQs
    • Mike agreed to take an initial stab at the scenarios
    • Parties that have a particular stake in this should pitch in to drive this to resolution
  • OSGi RFC 138 discussion.
    • There was a brief discussion around recent changes in RFC 138.
    • Equinox will have the required hooks but will not have an implementation.
    • RT (or other) projects needing the upper layer will need to do/get one
    • we should coordinate if multiple projects have similar needs
Retrieved from "https://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=RT/meetings/PMC_Minutes_100811&oldid=214684"

This page was last modified 09:33, 11 August 2010 by Eclipsepedia anonymous user Unnamed Poltroon.

Back to the top