Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "EmfIndex Comparison"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Indexing Time == | == Indexing Time == | ||
+ | |||
+ | This test measured the time which is needed to index x-times the content of Ecore.ecore. (Containing 393 instances of EObject and 520 references) | ||
{| width="200" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" | {| width="200" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | <br> |
− | | 1000 | + | | 1000 |
− | | 2000 | + | | 2000 |
| 3000 | | 3000 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | SAP | + | | SAP |
− | | | + | | 15,4 s |
− | | | + | | 29,9 s |
− | | | + | | 45,3 s |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Itemis | + | | Itemis |
− | | | + | | 14,6 s |
− | | | + | | 28,4 s |
− | | | + | | 43,5 s |
|} | |} |
Revision as of 03:45, 2 September 2009
This page is intended to compare the two index implementations form different viewpoints such as
- API
- Performance
- Memory Consumption
- How to build a convinient Query API on top of the low level API
Performance
Indexing Time
This test measured the time which is needed to index x-times the content of Ecore.ecore. (Containing 393 instances of EObject and 520 references)
|
1000 | 2000 | 3000 |
SAP | 15,4 s | 29,9 s | 45,3 s |
Itemis | 14,6 s | 28,4 s | 43,5 s |