Difference between revisions of "COSMOS Design 237924"

Revision as of 21:35, 26 June 2008

Create additional test cases for the SML validator

Change History

Workload Estimation

Terminologies/Acronyms

The terminologies/acronyms below are commonly used throughout this document.

Purpose

This enhancement (bugzilla 237924) is to ensure we provide complete test coverage so that our SML validator can be declared a fully compliant implementation of SML 1.1 and SML-IF 1.1 specs.

This section lists all tests that will be implemented after this enhancement is complete.

Color legend:

• Test cases we need to address as part of this enhancement
• Test cases already supported by our implementation

The section headings map to those in Service Modeling Language 1.1 Test Plan.

2.2 Rule Bindings

• 1-on-1 rule bindings (valid and invalid)
• 1-on-2 rule bindings (valid and invalid)

4 References

• Reference with one scheme
• Reference with two recognized schemes
• Reference with one recognized and one unrecognized scheme
• Reference with two unresolved scheme

• Nullified references
• Specifying sml:nilref without sml:ref
• Inconsistent references that are nullified (to ensure nullified references are not processed)

• Deref used in xpath1scheme()
• Unknown namespace in xpath1scheme()
• Unresolved xpath1scheme() scheme
• Syntax error in xpath1scheme()
• Valid xpath1scheme()

• Empty reference element
• Intra-document reference
• Relative reference with an undefined interchange set base uri
• Reference resolving to multiple elements
• Reference resolving to no element (document URI is unresolved)
• Reference resolving to no element (fragment is unresolved)
• Reference resolving to a non-root element
• Multiple references to a single element
• Reference with sml:ref set to an invalid value

Note: Does the spec allow multiple sml:uri elements as a child of a reference element? The first point under 4.3.1 states that exactly one sml:uri element should be included as a child of a reference element. There are some test cases where two instances of sml:uri are used to test references with multiple recognized schemes. We need to change them if the spec doesn’t allow it. One suggestion is to define a simple reference scheme.

4.2.7 deref() Function

• Processing a deref function in schematron rule where the function is applicable to multiple elements
• Processing a deref function in schematron rule where the function is applicable to a single element
• Use of deref with a reference that include fragments
• Use of deref with a reference that uses an unrecognized scheme
• Use of deref with a reference consisting of two schemes that resolve to the same target element
• Use of deref with a reference consisting of two schemes that resolve to two different target elements
• Use of deref with a reference resolving to multiple elements
• Use of deref with a reference consisting of two schemes with each resolving to multiple target elements that are different

5.1.1 sml:acyclic

• Invalid/valid acyclic flag on a non-abstract, global type declaration
• Invalid acyclic flag on an abstract type declaration
• Invalid acyclic flag on a type declaration with local element declarations
• Invalid acyclic flag on an anonymous type declaration
• Invalid/valid derivation by extension
• Invalid/valid acyclic cases by restriction
• Defining acyclic on an element declaration
• Valid two acyclic references forming a cycle
• Valid cycle with non-acyclic reference type
• Invalid acyclic flag with one node referencing itself

5.1.2 Constraints on SML Reference Targets

• Elements with name=
• Elements with ref=
• Global element
• Local element
• Defined on complex type instead of element declaration
• Invalid/valid derivation by restriction
• Invalid/valid group substitution
• Invalid value for the constraints
• Consistent target constraints for elements with same name and namespace contained in content model of a complex type
• sml:targetRequired = true and reference element is sml:nil=true
• Derivation by extension

5.2 SML Identity Constraints

• Elements with name=
• Element with ref=
• Defining the constraint on a type declaration
• Presence of the name attribute along with the ref attribute
• Presence of field and selector when ref attribute is set
• Inconsistent ref attribute
• Selector statement with deref()
• Field statement with deref()
• Global element declaration E has a substitution group affiliation G, with inconsistent constraint
• If two element declarations E1 and E2 have the same {namespace name} and {name} and they are both contained (directly, indirectly, or implicitly) in a content model of a complex type, then E1 and E2 MUST have the same set of {SML identity-constraints definitions}.

6.2 Rule Support

• Evaluation of XPath expression augmented to sml:deref() function
• Global element declarations
• Global types declaration
• Local element declaration
• Anonymous type declaration
• Abstract element/type declaration
• Applying applicable rules by extension
• Applying applicable rules by restriction

SML-IF Features

• Well formed SML-IF document
• Valid against SML-IF’s schema
• Embedded and remotely referenced documents
• Definition/Instance documents in base64 encoded format
• Empty document content
• Remotely referenced instance document
• Remotely referenced definition document
• Remotely referencing a document with an unrecognized locator scheme
• Invalid base URI
• Base URI with a fragment
• Relative URI with/without a base URI
• Relative URI with document base URI
• Relative URI with interchange base URI and document base URI
• Two documents with duplicate aliases
• One document with duplicate aliases
• One document with duplicate aliases but with one specified relatively
• Document alias with a fragment component
• schemaLocation attribute on xs:include
• schemaLocation attribute on xs:redefine
• schemaLocation attribute on instance
• No schema binding
• Schema binding with no match
• Schema binding with default only
• Schema binding with a subset + default
• Schema binding with multiple matches
• Use of an outside document when schemaComplete is true

Open Issues/Questions

All reviewer feedback should go in the Talk page for 237924.