Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:ALF/Vocabularies/Requirements Management/Schema


Requirement Object content

This wasn't described directly but I inferred the content. My assumption is that requirements are not huge and it is reasonable to fully materialize all the data for attributes and comments and sets of descriptors for links, versions , attachments etc. It may be thatshould be factored out differently based on the expected use cases and amount of data.

Object Ids

I assume that the various objects can be identified by a string based unique ID. If the implmenting RM tool has relative IDs then it can create s composite id (eg DB.ProjectId.RequirementId.CommentId) It si unclear if this s a reasonable assumption. If teh auxillary objects cannot be identified in this way then we will need to make adjustments to the type-service-evetn definitions

Back to the top